Difference between revisions of "CS17.3-H"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
SCEC would like to update the velocity model used in the CyberShake 17.3 Central California Hazard model with an improved Central California Basin Model. We current call the velocity model used in CyberShake Study 17.3 as CVM CS17.3. We propose to call the updated model CS17.3-H, once the new Harvard Central California Basin Model has been added. | SCEC would like to update the velocity model used in the CyberShake 17.3 Central California Hazard model with an improved Central California Basin Model. We current call the velocity model used in CyberShake Study 17.3 as CVM CS17.3. We propose to call the updated model CS17.3-H, once the new Harvard Central California Basin Model has been added. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Telecon Follow-ups == | ||
| + | We have a Central California Basin telecon and based on discussions, we want to produce some more plots of the CS173 velocity model to help with the analysis of it before and after the insertion of the San Joaquin Basin and the Santa Maria Basin. | ||
| + | |||
| + | #scatter plots vp and density, at different depths, from CS173. | ||
| + | # Wiki page that describes the density calculation done for cvms4.26, | ||
| + | # Difference plot of densities from cs173, and densities using density calculation, to determine if was used to create the density values | ||
| + | for cs173. They also asked for at least one Vs30 maps, but we may need | ||
| + | to show both the etree values, and the calculated values, using the | ||
| + | velocity models we have, and velocity models we have with ely gtl on it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
== Notes on Central California Basin Model == | == Notes on Central California Basin Model == | ||
Revision as of 20:50, 11 May 2018
SCEC would like to update the velocity model used in the CyberShake 17.3 Central California Hazard model with an improved Central California Basin Model. We current call the velocity model used in CyberShake Study 17.3 as CVM CS17.3. We propose to call the updated model CS17.3-H, once the new Harvard Central California Basin Model has been added.
Telecon Follow-ups
We have a Central California Basin telecon and based on discussions, we want to produce some more plots of the CS173 velocity model to help with the analysis of it before and after the insertion of the San Joaquin Basin and the Santa Maria Basin.
- scatter plots vp and density, at different depths, from CS173.
- Wiki page that describes the density calculation done for cvms4.26,
- Difference plot of densities from cs173, and densities using density calculation, to determine if was used to create the density values
for cs173. They also asked for at least one Vs30 maps, but we may need to show both the etree values, and the calculated values, using the velocity models we have, and velocity models we have with ely gtl on it.
Notes on Central California Basin Model
- CCA Basin Integration Notes by Andreas Plesch on Basin Model (15MB pptx)
