Difference between revisions of "CSEP Minutes 06-27-2018"

Revision as of 20:23, 27 June 2018

Participants: M. Werner, D. Rhoades, and W. Savran

extract daily rates for each forecast and plot to verify intregity (first step)
verify where W, T and R tests are not counted for entire time period
decipher the timestamp on the evaluation file
how does the system put together the cumulative tests
are there cumulative analogs for each evaluation?
curated csep1.0 data might be needed to compare against csep2.0 forecasts
verification exercises:
- overlapping window: ETAS extract first month of forecasts and observed catalogs and evaluations
  - RELM tests (N, L, CL, M, S)
- start at the beginning of time to verify cumulative tests
- write scripts for this
scripts to extract evaluation results
journal for publishing geoscience data (https://www.earth-system-science-data.net/)
check existence of the catalog data
- we would need to flag evaluations where catalog could not be downloaded
competition for fault-based forecasts?
- some hazard models have the notion of seismic regions
- new zealand has the issue of faults
- ucerf3 most advanced

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 * check existence of the catalog data
 ** we would need to flag evaluations where catalog could not be downloaded
+* competition for fault-based forecasts?
+** some hazard models have the notion of seismic regions
+** new zealand has the issue of faults
+** ucerf3 most advanced