Difference between revisions of "Site1D"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Example Input Files == | == Example Input Files == | ||
| + | This lists the simulation parameters and files needed. | ||
*[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/broadband/Site1D/control.dat Control.dat] | *[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/broadband/Site1D/control.dat Control.dat] | ||
| − | |||
| + | This is an example site profile input file (nlayer+1) by 5 | ||
*[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/broadband/Site1D/profile.dat Profile.dat] | *[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/broadband/Site1D/profile.dat Profile.dat] | ||
| − | |||
| + | This is an example soil parameter input file (N_Obs by (n_ma*4)) | ||
*[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/broadband/Site1D/curve.dat Curve.dat] | *[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/broadband/Site1D/curve.dat Curve.dat] | ||
| − | |||
| + | This is the input motion (acceleration) as nt_out by 2 | ||
*[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/broadband/Site1D/incident_s.dat incident_s.dat] | *[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/broadband/Site1D/incident_s.dat incident_s.dat] | ||
| − | |||
| + | This is an input station location file | ||
*[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/broadband/Site1D/one_stat.dat one_stat.dat] | *[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/broadband/Site1D/one_stat.dat one_stat.dat] | ||
| − | |||
== Site 1D Acceptance Test == | == Site 1D Acceptance Test == | ||
Revision as of 06:22, 6 October 2011
Site1D is a non-linear site response module from Dominic Assimaki of George Tech, and her students including Wei Li who has helped SCEC with this current implementation.
Contents
Program Description
Example Input Files
This lists the simulation parameters and files needed.
This is an example site profile input file (nlayer+1) by 5
This is an example soil parameter input file (N_Obs by (n_ma*4))
This is the input motion (acceleration) as nt_out by 2
This is an input station location file
Site 1D Acceptance Test
Our broadband acceptance tests are based on running a module for a historical earthquake, calculating seismograms at sites where we have observations, then comparing the simulation seismogram to the observation seismogram.
We have identified one site (34.5640, -118.6471 - near Castaic CA) for which we have both (1) site profile of the necessary detail, and (2) observational seismogram for Northridge earthquake.
