Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Scott"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Got in trouble on Ranger | *Got in trouble on Ranger | ||
*Got rupture geometries from Kevin for F2F ruptures | *Got rupture geometries from Kevin for F2F ruptures | ||
− | *Checked | + | *Checked rerun of weak scaling, didn't finish; submit 3rd test |
== Today == | == Today == | ||
+ | *Compare SGTs from workflow SMALL site to by-hand SMALL site | ||
*Try Pegasus 4.0.0 with TEST curve | *Try Pegasus 4.0.0 with TEST curve | ||
*Run TEST curve with in-mem RV generation on Ranger | *Run TEST curve with in-mem RV generation on Ranger | ||
*Run post-processing for full CS site with Kraken SGTs | *Run post-processing for full CS site with Kraken SGTs | ||
*Email Rob F2F ruptures, ask for thoughts | *Email Rob F2F ruptures, ask for thoughts | ||
+ | *Check results from profiling test on Kraken | ||
== Blocked == | == Blocked == |
Revision as of 18:04, 21 February 2012
Yesterday
- Narrowed down RWG 3D issue to input files; ran SMALL site to help with debugging
- Got in trouble on Ranger
- Got rupture geometries from Kevin for F2F ruptures
- Checked rerun of weak scaling, didn't finish; submit 3rd test
Today
- Compare SGTs from workflow SMALL site to by-hand SMALL site
- Try Pegasus 4.0.0 with TEST curve
- Run TEST curve with in-mem RV generation on Ranger
- Run post-processing for full CS site with Kraken SGTs
- Email Rob F2F ruptures, ask for thoughts
- Check results from profiling test on Kraken
Blocked
- No
Follow-ups
- No
Areas of Responsibilities
- CyberShake 1.4
- Broadband CyberShake
- Code migration