Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Scott"

Revision as of 18:07, 22 February 2012

Compared SGTs from workflow SMALL site to by-hand SMALL site - looks fine
Submitted run testing theory about rotation
Tried Pegasus 4.0.0 with TEST curve, ran into issue, emailed Karan
Ran TEST curve with in-mem RV generation on Ranger, passed
Discovered slow performance of SGTMerge step with full-scale SGTs on Kraken
Checked results from profiling test on Kraken - some kind of corruption in TAU files, emailed Matt

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Yesterday ==
-*Narrowed down RWG 3D issue to input files; ran SMALL site to help with debugging
+*Compared SGTs from workflow SMALL site to by-hand SMALL site - looks fine
-*Got in trouble on Ranger on 800 cores
+*Submitted run testing theory about rotation
-*Got rupture geometries from Kevin for F2F ruptures
+*Tried Pegasus 4.0.0 with TEST curve, ran into issue, emailed Karan
-*Checked rerun of weak scaling, didn't finish;  submit 3rd test
+*Ran TEST curve with in-mem RV generation on Ranger, passed
+*Discovered slow performance of SGTMerge step with full-scale SGTs on Kraken
+*Checked results from profiling test on Kraken - some kind of corruption in TAU files, emailed Matt
 == Today ==
-*Compare SGTs from workflow SMALL site to by-hand SMALL site
+*Adjusted SGT Merge parameters on Kraken, trying again - may need MPI I/O
-*Try Pegasus 4.0.0 with TEST curve
-*Run TEST curve with in-mem RV generation on Ranger
-*Run post-processing for full CS site with Kraken SGTs
 *Email Rob F2F ruptures, ask for thoughts
-*Check results from profiling test on Kraken
+*CyberShake call
+*Check newest run results with 3D issue
+*Finish interrupted PP runs on Ranger
+*Add memcached to in-memory RV generation
 == Blocked ==
@@ Line 17: / Line 19: @@
 == Follow-ups ==
-*No
+*CyberShake call
 == Areas of Responsibilities ==