Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Fabio"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Yesterday: == | == Yesterday: == | ||
| − | * | + | * Reviewed Broadband Python code |
* Working on trunk, fixing Python styling issues as I review the code | * Working on trunk, fixing Python styling issues as I review the code | ||
| − | * | + | * Finished running Landers/URS validation for 11.2.3 |
| − | * Started running 11.2.3 | + | * Started running Loma Prieta/URS validation for 11.2.3 |
| + | * Set up trunk version of BBP on broadband.usc.edu, ran unit tests | ||
| + | * Discussed with Phil adding the validation runs as acceptance tests | ||
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
| − | * | + | * Review Broadband testing framework |
| − | * | + | * Add one of the validation cases as an acceptance test, validate output |
* Continue running 11.2.3 validation tests | * Continue running 11.2.3 validation tests | ||
| − | |||
== Blocked: == | == Blocked: == | ||
| − | * | + | * No |
== Followups: == | == Followups: == | ||
| − | * | + | * No |
Revision as of 17:08, 17 May 2012
Contents
Yesterday:
- Reviewed Broadband Python code
- Working on trunk, fixing Python styling issues as I review the code
- Finished running Landers/URS validation for 11.2.3
- Started running Loma Prieta/URS validation for 11.2.3
- Set up trunk version of BBP on broadband.usc.edu, ran unit tests
- Discussed with Phil adding the validation runs as acceptance tests
Today:
- Review Broadband testing framework
- Add one of the validation cases as an acceptance test, validate output
- Continue running 11.2.3 validation tests
Blocked:
- No
Followups:
- No
