Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Fabio"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Yesterday: == | == Yesterday: == | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
* Investigated SDSU validation run results | * Investigated SDSU validation run results | ||
| − | ** | + | ** Looked at how urs_gof module uses the station list to plot GOF |
| − | * | + | * Followed Kim's suggestion and used SDSU's 3D module for LF |
| − | * | + | ** 11.2.3 plot improves significantly with 22 stations |
| + | ** trunk plot matches 11.2.3 with 22 stations | ||
| + | ** trunk plot with all stations looks very good | ||
| + | * Validated John's Fling study scenario 140 runs against the ones Phil ran at HPCC | ||
| + | ** Identical bbp files | ||
| + | * Looked at how the files in the plot directory are used by the platform | ||
| + | |||
* Integrated Phil's change into trunk | * Integrated Phil's change into trunk | ||
** Need a workaround for both cases (with and without site response) | ** Need a workaround for both cases (with and without site response) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 18: | ||
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
| − | * | + | * Call with Ronnie and Katie about Fling Study |
| − | ** | + | * For SDSU testing, figure out from where the site amplification module gets the reference velocity |
| + | * Make trunk work both with and without site response | ||
| + | * Trak #95 (wiki updating) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Ongoing: == | ||
* Look for ways to break up the GF directory layout, some ideas are: | * Look for ways to break up the GF directory layout, some ideas are: | ||
** First candidate is removing the plot directory from the GF directory | ** First candidate is removing the plot directory from the GF directory | ||
** Create separate validation package | ** Create separate validation package | ||
** Separate events and codebases from each other | ** Separate events and codebases from each other | ||
| − | |||
== Blocked: == | == Blocked: == | ||
| Line 22: | Line 33: | ||
== Followups: == | == Followups: == | ||
| − | * | + | * Fling Study call with Ronnie, Katie, Feng, Phil @ 10:30am |
| + | * Meeting with John Yu to understand how to run Fling Study scenarios locally | ||
Revision as of 16:36, 24 May 2012
Contents
Yesterday:
- Investigated SDSU validation run results
- Looked at how urs_gof module uses the station list to plot GOF
- Followed Kim's suggestion and used SDSU's 3D module for LF
- 11.2.3 plot improves significantly with 22 stations
- trunk plot matches 11.2.3 with 22 stations
- trunk plot with all stations looks very good
- Validated John's Fling study scenario 140 runs against the ones Phil ran at HPCC
- Identical bbp files
- Looked at how the files in the plot directory are used by the platform
- Integrated Phil's change into trunk
- Need a workaround for both cases (with and without site response)
- Python code reworking
- Enabled $Id$ svn prop for all Python modules
Today:
- Call with Ronnie and Katie about Fling Study
- For SDSU testing, figure out from where the site amplification module gets the reference velocity
- Make trunk work both with and without site response
- Trak #95 (wiki updating)
Ongoing:
- Look for ways to break up the GF directory layout, some ideas are:
- First candidate is removing the plot directory from the GF directory
- Create separate validation package
- Separate events and codebases from each other
Blocked:
- No
Followups:
- Fling Study call with Ronnie, Katie, Feng, Phil @ 10:30am
- Meeting with John Yu to understand how to run Fling Study scenarios locally
