Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Scott"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*RWG TEST SGT runs competed on HPC, submitted PP | *RWG TEST SGT runs competed on HPC, submitted PP | ||
*RWG USC SGT runs completed | *RWG USC SGT runs completed | ||
| + | *Meeting with Phil | ||
*CyberShake call | *CyberShake call | ||
*Initial test of UCVM in AWP format does not agree with reference | *Initial test of UCVM in AWP format does not agree with reference | ||
| + | *Gideon finished piping code "I/O forwarding" | ||
| + | *Started getting list of sites together for production run | ||
== Today == | == Today == | ||
*Extract v3 vs v3.0.3 seismograms at commonly tested rupture, send to Rob | *Extract v3 vs v3.0.3 seismograms at commonly tested rupture, send to Rob | ||
*Check UCVM AWP results - start with projection | *Check UCVM AWP results - start with projection | ||
| + | *Run test of I/O forwarding on Kraken | ||
| + | *Track down SGTs for production run | ||
== Blocked == | == Blocked == | ||
Revision as of 17:09, 20 September 2012
Yesterday
- Ran PP with AWP SGTs - a few workflows terminated, rerunning
- RWG TEST SGT runs competed on HPC, submitted PP
- RWG USC SGT runs completed
- Meeting with Phil
- CyberShake call
- Initial test of UCVM in AWP format does not agree with reference
- Gideon finished piping code "I/O forwarding"
- Started getting list of sites together for production run
Today
- Extract v3 vs v3.0.3 seismograms at commonly tested rupture, send to Rob
- Check UCVM AWP results - start with projection
- Run test of I/O forwarding on Kraken
- Track down SGTs for production run
Blocked
- No
Follow-ups
- No
- Email CyberShake papers to Liwen
- Continue testing compiler optimizations
- Run some I/O tests to get reference values
Areas of Responsibilities
- CyberShake 1.4
- Broadband CyberShake
- Code migration
