Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Fabio"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Continued working on BBToolbox integration | * Continued working on BBToolbox integration | ||
** Different ways to handle scenario and validation simulations | ** Different ways to handle scenario and validation simulations | ||
− | * Ran | + | ** Ran full Northridge with SDSU seismograms, results look good |
− | ** | + | ** Started full Northridge with GP low-frequency simulations, still going on |
− | * | + | ** Started full LOMAP-scenario mode with GP-SDSU codebases |
− | * | + | * Sent 50-realization UCSB on HPCC results to RA, JC |
+ | * Cleaned-up LOMAP validation package | ||
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
* Continue integrating BBToolbox into BBP | * Continue integrating BBToolbox into BBP | ||
− | |||
** Send status update to Kim, Rumi | ** Send status update to Kim, Rumi | ||
− | * | + | * Look into UCSB's seismograms |
+ | ** Investigate 10g's differences for some stations | ||
== Blocked: == | == Blocked: == | ||
Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
== Followups: == | == Followups: == | ||
− | * | + | * No |
Revision as of 17:05, 4 October 2012
Contents
Yesterday:
- Continued working on BBToolbox integration
- Different ways to handle scenario and validation simulations
- Ran full Northridge with SDSU seismograms, results look good
- Started full Northridge with GP low-frequency simulations, still going on
- Started full LOMAP-scenario mode with GP-SDSU codebases
- Sent 50-realization UCSB on HPCC results to RA, JC
- Cleaned-up LOMAP validation package
Today:
- Continue integrating BBToolbox into BBP
- Send status update to Kim, Rumi
- Look into UCSB's seismograms
- Investigate 10g's differences for some stations
Blocked:
- No
Followups:
- No