Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Fabio"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Yesterday: == | == Yesterday: == | ||
| − | * | + | * Updated Trac site with new activities |
| − | ** | + | * Checked the hypocenter randomization code into svn |
| − | * | + | ** Also added option to disable randomization |
| − | * | + | * Got RK's raw files for the December M6.3 scenarios |
| − | + | * Generated raw files using new scripts for same scenario | |
| − | * Generated | + | * Received ExSim module from Karen with sample LOMAP inputs and outputs |
| − | ** | + | * Generated 12 GMPE validation packages |
| − | * | + | ** M6.2SS, M6.6SS, M6.6RV, 20km and 50km, SoCal and NoCal |
| + | * Ran SoCal and NoCal M6.2SS on broadband | ||
| + | ** Looks promising | ||
| + | ** Ruptures similar but not identical (unexpected!) | ||
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
| − | * | + | * Compare RK's data files with the ones we get in order to figure out why boxplots are different |
| − | + | * Test newer changes to FW's GMPE code, check into BBP svn | |
| − | |||
* Add version numbers on validation packages and GFs | * Add version numbers on validation packages and GFs | ||
* Incorporate JC's changes to the UCSB rupture generator | * Incorporate JC's changes to the UCSB rupture generator | ||
** Use only 1 rupture generator for vertical and dipping faults | ** Use only 1 rupture generator for vertical and dipping faults | ||
| − | * Set up meeting with CG and KA to discuss ExSim | + | * Run ExSim outside BB Platform, compare results with KA's |
| + | ** Set up meeting with CG and KA to discuss ExSim platform integration | ||
== Blocked: == | == Blocked: == | ||
| Line 24: | Line 27: | ||
== Followups: == | == Followups: == | ||
| − | * | + | * Cybershake call @ 11am |
Revision as of 18:09, 23 January 2013
Contents
Yesterday:
- Updated Trac site with new activities
- Checked the hypocenter randomization code into svn
- Also added option to disable randomization
- Got RK's raw files for the December M6.3 scenarios
- Generated raw files using new scripts for same scenario
- Received ExSim module from Karen with sample LOMAP inputs and outputs
- Generated 12 GMPE validation packages
- M6.2SS, M6.6SS, M6.6RV, 20km and 50km, SoCal and NoCal
- Ran SoCal and NoCal M6.2SS on broadband
- Looks promising
- Ruptures similar but not identical (unexpected!)
Today:
- Compare RK's data files with the ones we get in order to figure out why boxplots are different
- Test newer changes to FW's GMPE code, check into BBP svn
- Add version numbers on validation packages and GFs
- Incorporate JC's changes to the UCSB rupture generator
- Use only 1 rupture generator for vertical and dipping faults
- Run ExSim outside BB Platform, compare results with KA's
- Set up meeting with CG and KA to discuss ExSim platform integration
Blocked:
- No
Followups:
- Cybershake call @ 11am
