Difference between revisions of "CyberShake PBR Study"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
This CyberShake Precarious Balanced Rock Study will evaluate whether CyberShake ground motions are likely to knock over known Precarious Rocks | This CyberShake Precarious Balanced Rock Study will evaluate whether CyberShake ground motions are likely to knock over known Precarious Rocks | ||
+ | == Inputs to calculation == | ||
+ | *Site | ||
+ | **List of Src/* | ||
+ | **List of Src/Rup/* | ||
+ | **List of Src/Rup/Var | ||
+ | |||
== PBR Site == | == PBR Site == |
Revision as of 19:03, 8 March 2013
This CyberShake Precarious Balanced Rock Study will evaluate whether CyberShake ground motions are likely to knock over known Precarious Rocks
Inputs to calculation
- Site
- List of Src/*
- List of Src/Rup/*
- List of Src/Rup/Var
PBR Site
We will begin by working with CyberShake 1.0 map data.
Low Freq seismograms
- PERRIS
- Lat/Long
- Nearby Faults:
- Fault Name:
- Src/Rupture Number:
- Number of rupture variations:
- Fault Parallel (degree's off North)
Broadband seismograms
- PERRIS
- Lat/Long
- Nearby Faults:
- Fault Name:
- Src/Rupture Number:
- Number of rupture variations:
- Fault Parallel (degree's off North)
Steps
- ask sc what code to calculate peak amps
- define output format schema
- implement in db and table in sqllite
- write test
- Find location of Perris PBR
- Find nearest src/rupture
- Estimate Rotation Angle of each fault