Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Fabio"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Yesterday: ==
 
== Yesterday: ==
  
* Created updated validation packages for RT
+
* Started working on Composite Source Model code
* Sent RT instructions on how to update her epicenter setup
+
** Talked to JA, got input files and comparison seismograms
* Sent JA another message about his code
+
** Compiled fortran codes
* Received software package with some instructions
+
** Ran codes manually
* Finished testing CSEP metadata code
+
** Greens Functions, and Simulation code
** Modifications for use in the BBP
+
** -O3 improves GF code performance by 40%, no changes to results, 10 stations/hr
 +
** Simulation code takes about 1 minute per realization (40 stations)
 +
** Results don't compare back to JAs data set, need to get updated synthetics from him
 +
* Broadband science call
 +
** Presented results of 6 scenarios using GP and 3 scenarios using ExSIM
 +
** GP scenarios improved, ExSIM scenarios got slightly worse
 +
* Finished etadata code
 +
** Use compile-time versions for compilers
 +
** Tested everything
 +
** Code checked into svn
 +
** Added start/end timestamps to BBP summary html file
  
 
== Today: ==
 
== Today: ==
  
* Start working on JA's code
+
* Start CSM Broadband module, automate manual steps
* Few modifications to the metadata code before checkin
+
* Talk to JC about getting updated packages
** Improve compiler version checks
+
* Generate a Mojave velocity model for RS
* Improve simulation timestamp handling
+
** Also other data files for her to test the SDSU pipeline
 +
* Ping KA about updates
 +
* E-mail CG about adding GMPE results to Part-A scenarios
  
 
== Blocked: ==
 
== Blocked: ==
Line 19: Line 31:
  
 
== Followups: ==
 
== Followups: ==
* No
+
* Call with JC @ tbd

Revision as of 18:03, 1 April 2013

Yesterday:

  • Started working on Composite Source Model code
    • Talked to JA, got input files and comparison seismograms
    • Compiled fortran codes
    • Ran codes manually
    • Greens Functions, and Simulation code
    • -O3 improves GF code performance by 40%, no changes to results, 10 stations/hr
    • Simulation code takes about 1 minute per realization (40 stations)
    • Results don't compare back to JAs data set, need to get updated synthetics from him
  • Broadband science call
    • Presented results of 6 scenarios using GP and 3 scenarios using ExSIM
    • GP scenarios improved, ExSIM scenarios got slightly worse
  • Finished etadata code
    • Use compile-time versions for compilers
    • Tested everything
    • Code checked into svn
    • Added start/end timestamps to BBP summary html file

Today:

  • Start CSM Broadband module, automate manual steps
  • Talk to JC about getting updated packages
  • Generate a Mojave velocity model for RS
    • Also other data files for her to test the SDSU pipeline
  • Ping KA about updates
  • E-mail CG about adding GMPE results to Part-A scenarios

Blocked:

  • No

Followups:

  • Call with JC @ tbd