Difference between revisions of "Computational Result Review Process"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* all rupture variations have amplitudes for all components | * all rupture variations have amplitudes for all components | ||
* no zero entries | * no zero entries | ||
| + | |||
| + | At study level: | ||
| + | * all hazard curves reviewed state, plus | ||
| + | * new hazard maps | ||
| + | * ratio maps between new results and 14.2 | ||
| + | * | ||
== Publishable == | == Publishable == | ||
Revision as of 18:15, 20 May 2015
We define three states through which large scale computational results increasing in confidence.
Define Data Set
Define which data set under consideration. For example, a hazard curve that is part of a study, might be considered complete, even if the full study is not complete.
Preliminary
Just created but complete
Reviewed
Data-set specific, standardized, defined, checks ready for use internal researchers. For example, for a hazard curve, review checks might include:
- no Nan
- No amplitudes beyond 10g
- all rupture variations have amplitudes for all components
- no zero entries
At study level:
- all hazard curves reviewed state, plus
- new hazard maps
- ratio maps between new results and 14.2
Publishable
Ready for use by external researchers.
