Difference between revisions of "CyberShake Production Run"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Planning for the next CyberShake Production Run | + | '''Planning for the next CyberShake Production Run''' |
== Planned Production Run == | == Planned Production Run == | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Points to Finalize == | == Points to Finalize == | ||
| − | # Are the current [[CCA]]06 3D velocity model and 1D velocity model ready for use? | + | # Are the current [[CCA]]06 3D velocity model and 1D velocity model ready for use ? |
| − | # Are the full N.SAF and S.SAF CVMs ready for use, including interfaces between CVMs? | + | # Are the full N.SAF and S.SAF CVMs ready for use, including interfaces between CVMs ? |
# Do the CyberShake meshes produced by UCVM match the expected CVM models including ? | # Do the CyberShake meshes produced by UCVM match the expected CVM models including ? | ||
# Do we include the N. SAF events for sites within 200km, and exclude N.SAF events for sites more than 200km away ? | # Do we include the N. SAF events for sites within 200km, and exclude N.SAF events for sites more than 200km away ? | ||
Revision as of 01:26, 6 December 2016
Planning for the next CyberShake Production Run
Planned Production Run
Points to Finalize
- Are the current CCA06 3D velocity model and 1D velocity model ready for use ?
- Are the full N.SAF and S.SAF CVMs ready for use, including interfaces between CVMs ?
- Do the CyberShake meshes produced by UCVM match the expected CVM models including ?
- Do we include the N. SAF events for sites within 200km, and exclude N.SAF events for sites more than 200km away ?
- Does the current CyberShake software stack on Blue Waters and Titan produce results equivalent to the CyberShake Study 15.4 software stack ?
