Difference between revisions of "GMSV Simulation Datasets"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Full validation set of simulations (Parts A & B) == | == Full validation set of simulations (Parts A & B) == | ||
*[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/bbp/BBP_Feb2017_Plots/ Feb 2017 Plots] | *[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/bbp/BBP_Feb2017_Plots/ Feb 2017 Plots] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Discussion of Data Sets == | ||
| + | There are some specific simulations that were run for GMSV on the BBP. RWG designed the rupture descriptions | ||
| + | and they were run by SCEC. The scenarios are: | ||
| + | *Elysian Park | ||
| + | *So. San Andreas | ||
| + | *San Jacinto | ||
| + | *Hayward | ||
| + | *No. San Andreas | ||
| + | |||
| + | In addition, a student working with FZ has been using the CyberShake results. Also, the GMSV group has used the BBP Part A & B results. | ||
== Related Entries == | == Related Entries == | ||
*[[CME_Project]] | *[[CME_Project]] | ||
*[[GMSV]] | *[[GMSV]] | ||
Revision as of 00:06, 1 February 2018
Data sets for upcoming SCEC/GMSV meeting:
Contents
GMSV group with data last March 2017
This includes Part-A data for Landers, Loma Prieta, Northridge, and North Palm Springs for all methods. Additionally, there's data for some Larger Magnitude events, like Elysian Park, Hayward, North and South San Andreas, and San Jacinto.
Full validation set of simulations (Parts A & B)
Discussion of Data Sets
There are some specific simulations that were run for GMSV on the BBP. RWG designed the rupture descriptions and they were run by SCEC. The scenarios are:
- Elysian Park
- So. San Andreas
- San Jacinto
- Hayward
- No. San Andreas
In addition, a student working with FZ has been using the CyberShake results. Also, the GMSV group has used the BBP Part A & B results.
