Difference between revisions of "GMSV Simulation Datasets"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Several data sets under discussion include: | Several data sets under discussion include: | ||
*Several LA region sites were selected, CyberShake ruptures identified, and then run in BBP. | *Several LA region sites were selected, CyberShake ruptures identified, and then run in BBP. | ||
| − | *Specific simulations that were run for GMSV on the BBP. RWG designed the rupture descriptions | + | *Specific simulations that were run for GMSV on the BBP. RWG designed the rupture descriptions and they were run by SCEC, including: |
| − | and they were run by SCEC | ||
**Elysian Park | **Elysian Park | ||
**So. San Andreas | **So. San Andreas | ||
Revision as of 00:09, 1 February 2018
Data sets for upcoming SCEC/GMSV meeting:
Contents
GMSV group with data last March 2017
This includes Part-A data for Landers, Loma Prieta, Northridge, and North Palm Springs for all methods. Additionally, there's data for some Larger Magnitude events, like Elysian Park, Hayward, North and South San Andreas, and San Jacinto.
Full validation set of simulations (Parts A & B)
Discussion of Data Sets
Several data sets under discussion include:
- Several LA region sites were selected, CyberShake ruptures identified, and then run in BBP.
- Specific simulations that were run for GMSV on the BBP. RWG designed the rupture descriptions and they were run by SCEC, including:
- Elysian Park
- So. San Andreas
- San Jacinto
- Hayward
- No. San Andreas
- A student working with FZ has been using the CyberShake results. Also, the GMSV group has used the BBP Part A & B results.
