Difference between revisions of "UCVM Vs30"
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{| border="1" | {| border="1" | ||
| − | ! lat !! lon !! Velocity model !! CyberShake-generated Vs30 !! UCVM Vs30 etree.map | + | ! lat !! lon !! Velocity model !! CyberShake-generated Vs30 !! UCVM 18.5 Vs30 from Model !! UCVM Vs30 etree.map |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 34.148426 || -118.17119 || CVM-S4.26.M01 || 838.8 || 748.00 | + | | 34.148426 || -118.17119 || CVM-S4.26.M01 || 838.8 || || 748.00 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 34.557 || -118.125 || CVM-S4.26.M01 || 2573.6 ||497.68 | + | | 34.557 || -118.125 || CVM-S4.26.M01 || 2573.6 || || 497.68 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 34.0192 || -118.286 || CVM-S4.26.M01 || 313.1 || 280.0 | + | | 34.0192 || -118.286 || CVM-S4.26.M01 || 313.1 || || 280.0 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 34.64021 || -118.91919 || CCA-06 || 3393.9 || 748.0 | + | | 34.64021 || -118.91919 || CCA-06 || 3393.9 || || 748.0 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 36.13968 || -120.36015 || CCA-06 || 2277.2 || 349.0 | + | | 36.13968 || -120.36015 || CCA-06 || 2277.2 || || 349.0 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | 34.26667 || -119.22848 || CCA-06 || 902.3 || 280.0 | + | | 34.26667 || -119.22848 || CCA-06 || 902.3 || || 280.0 |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 06:53, 16 May 2018
Contents
Introduction
There may be an issue with how UCVM calculates Vs30 values. Presently UCVM uses the following formula:
- sum(Vs sampled from [0,30] at 1 meters, for 31 total values) / 31
Rob has suggested that the correct formula should be:
- 30 / sum(1 / (Vs sampled from [0, 30) at 1 meters, for 30 total values))
This can have a significant impact for Vs30 calculations. For the BBP1D model, UCVM calculates the Vs30 as 932m/s, whereas Rob's formula calculates it as 862m/s.
Another approach was used in CyberShake Study 15.12, in conversations with Rob:
- Vs30 = 30 / Sum (1/(Vs sampled from [0.5,29.5] in 1 meter increments, for 30 total values)).
Points for comparison
We have selected 6 points to compare Vs30 as generated using the CyberShake approach (using half-meters) to other UCVM approaches.
| lat | lon | Velocity model | CyberShake-generated Vs30 | UCVM 18.5 Vs30 from Model | UCVM Vs30 etree.map |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.148426 | -118.17119 | CVM-S4.26.M01 | 838.8 | 748.00 | |
| 34.557 | -118.125 | CVM-S4.26.M01 | 2573.6 | 497.68 | |
| 34.0192 | -118.286 | CVM-S4.26.M01 | 313.1 | 280.0 | |
| 34.64021 | -118.91919 | CCA-06 | 3393.9 | 748.0 | |
| 36.13968 | -120.36015 | CCA-06 | 2277.2 | 349.0 | |
| 34.26667 | -119.22848 | CCA-06 | 902.3 | 280.0 |
= UCVMC Vs30 from etree
-118.1712 34.1484 -118.1250 34.5570 -118.2860 34.0192 -118.9192 34.6402 -120.3602 36.1397 -119.2285 34.2667
UCVMC v18.5 results
-bash-4.2$ ./vs30_query -f ../conf/ucvm.conf -m cvmsi < in.txt -118.1712 34.1484 821.328 -118.1250 34.5570 2573.634 -118.2860 34.0192 310.574 -118.9192 34.6402 3393.808 -120.3602 36.1397 2436.254 -119.2285 34.2667 283.145
-bash-4.2$ ./vs30_query -f ../conf/ucvm.conf -m cca < in.txt -118.1712 34.1484 0.000 -118.1250 34.5570 2582.267 -118.2860 34.0192 0.000 -118.9192 34.6402 3331.251 -120.3602 36.1397 2279.326 -119.2285 34.2667 902.013
== Related Links: Plot command used to plot_vs30_map. ./plot_vs30_map.py -b 30.5,-126.0 -u 42.5,-112.5 -s 0.01 -a s -c cs173 -o vs30_cs173.png
Scott posted vs30 values from CyberShake here: http://scec.usc.edu/scecpedia/CyberShake_Study_15.12#Vs_values_v2.0
Example Image:
