Difference between revisions of "CyberShake Background Seismicity"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
| [[File:ratio_ucerf3_supra_only_vs_sub+supra+off_10p_in_50.png|400px|thumb|left]] | | [[File:ratio_ucerf3_supra_only_vs_sub+supra+off_10p_in_50.png|400px|thumb|left]] | ||
| [[File:ratio_ucerf3_supra_only_vs_sub+supra+off_2p_in_50.png|400px|thumb|left]] | | [[File:ratio_ucerf3_supra_only_vs_sub+supra+off_2p_in_50.png|400px|thumb|left]] | ||
| − | | [[ | + | | [[File:ratio_ucerf3_supra_only_vs_sub+supra+off_1p_in_50.png|400px|thumb|left]] |
|- | |- | ||
! Ratio Supra+Sub/Complete | ! Ratio Supra+Sub/Complete | ||
Revision as of 21:02, 5 September 2018
Goal: determine the importance of background seismicity in different parts of CA to either validate it's exclusion in CyberShake or motivate an inclusion strategy.
UCERF2
Calculation parameters:
- GMPE: NGA-West2 GMPE (average of 4 models)
- ERF: UCERF2, with and without background seismicity
- Site Effects: Vs30 is from Wills (2015), no basin depth terms included
- IMT: 2 second SA.
| Model | 10% in 50yr | 2% in 50yr | 1% in 50yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excluding Background | |||
| Including Background | |||
| Ratio Exclude/Include |
UCERF3
Calculation parameters:
- GMPE: NGA-West2 GMPE (average of 4 models)
- ERF: UCERF3, with the following configurations
- Supra-seismogenic ruptures only (only supra-seismogenic ruptures have finite fault surfaces in UCERF3, all others treated as gridded)
- Supra and Sub-seismogenic ruptures only (this adds gridded ruptures that correspond to sub-seimogenic ruptures on known faults)
- Supra, Sub-seismogenic, and off fault ruptures (complete model)
- Site Effects: Vs30 is from Wills (2015), no basin depth terms included
- IMT: 2 second SA.
| Model | 10% in 50yr | 2% in 50yr | 1% in 50yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supra-Seismogenic On-Fault Only | |||
| Sub+Supra-Seismogenic On-Fault Only | |||
| Complete Model (Supra+Sub+Off) | |||
| Ratio Supra-Only/Complete | |||
| Ratio Supra+Sub/Complete |
