Difference between revisions of "UCVM elevation vs depth, model boundary"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 66: | Line 66: | ||
| [[File:sketch.png|thumb|300px|]] | | [[File:sketch.png|thumb|300px|]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | A: elevation 122.589 (depth 0) | ||
+ | B: elevation 0 (depth 122.589) | ||
+ | C: elevation -300 (depth 412.589) | ||
== Related Links == | == Related Links == | ||
*[[UCVM]] | *[[UCVM]] |
Revision as of 23:59, 19 February 2019
Contents
Model Boundary
Using depth profile plots to show the bottom of the model boundary in relationship to possible background 1d model
Using (-119.03, 35.38) near Bakersfield, CA
SCEC 1d (1d)
CVM-H v15.1(cvmh) with optional configurable 1d background
./plot_depth_profile.py -d vp -b ${START} -e ${END} -v 10 -c ${MODEL} -s ${LAT},${LON} -o ${MODEL}_${IDX}_depth.png
START is 0 END is 250000 MODEL is cvmh IDX is Bakersfield LAT is 35.38 LON is -119.03
How deep are the Models
At -119.03,35.38
At -123,37,0.0,1000000.0
Query by elevation vs by depth
A: elevation 122.589 (depth 0) B: elevation 0 (depth 122.589) C: elevation -300 (depth 412.589)