Difference between revisions of "CSEP Minutes 08-07-2019"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
''Participants:'' W. Savran, A. Michael, M. Werner, D. Rhoades
 
''Participants:'' W. Savran, A. Michael, M. Werner, D. Rhoades
  
 +
'''CSEP Evaluations'''
 
* finite fault uncertainty 3.0% error in source model has equivalent error to 1 Mw unit when thinking about slip.
 
* finite fault uncertainty 3.0% error in source model has equivalent error to 1 Mw unit when thinking about slip.
 
* time-dependent magnitude of completeness during first 2 days of the sequence. page 2016 and hardebeck, originally from anges helmstetter.
 
* time-dependent magnitude of completeness during first 2 days of the sequence. page 2016 and hardebeck, originally from anges helmstetter.

Latest revision as of 20:09, 7 August 2019

CSEP Working Group Home Page

Participants: W. Savran, A. Michael, M. Werner, D. Rhoades

CSEP Evaluations

  • finite fault uncertainty 3.0% error in source model has equivalent error to 1 Mw unit when thinking about slip.
  • time-dependent magnitude of completeness during first 2 days of the sequence. page 2016 and hardebeck, originally from anges helmstetter.
  • place dots at the end of the bin and bin daily, hourly for days, log-scale (y-axis) or log-log with logarithmically spaced bins.
  • 1 WC radius around centroid of the sequence this can come from Comcat.
  • consider using jet for the conditional rate density plots.
  • crd: increase the magnitude greater that mw 4.0.
  • m-test: magnitude of completeness plots, compute conditional on the number of events.
  • s-test: compute conditional on the number of events like the m-test, spatial map of the likelihood scores.
  • for stat_sei: need plots to illustrate what we are doing visually.
  • b-value: should look conditionally on event numbers.
  • inter event distance change from 2d to 3d.
  • srl special issue with ucerf3 forecasts. are simulation results considered data.