Difference between revisions of "Broadband Product Backlog"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 5: | Line 5: | ||
## Port the BBP to Python 3 | ## Port the BBP to Python 3 | ||
## Validation event : Hector Mine | ## Validation event : Hector Mine | ||
− | |||
# Core | # Core | ||
## Update BBP license to the BSD-3 license | ## Update BBP license to the BSD-3 license | ||
− | |||
# UCSB | # UCSB | ||
## Help implementation of UCSB double corner | ## Help implementation of UCSB double corner | ||
Line 15: | Line 13: | ||
## Integrate UCSB multi-fault rupture code | ## Integrate UCSB multi-fault rupture code | ||
## Start with Landers | ## Start with Landers | ||
− | |||
# Infrastructure | # Infrastructure | ||
## Talk with Edric about the assets tracking | ## Talk with Edric about the assets tracking | ||
Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
## standard/common github continuous integration toos | ## standard/common github continuous integration toos | ||
## software coverage measurement tools (check with ossian) | ## software coverage measurement tools (check with ossian) | ||
− | |||
# Future Release | # Future Release | ||
## Define reduced set of tests for BBP verification before release | ## Define reduced set of tests for BBP verification before release | ||
## Document Science review process | ## Document Science review process | ||
− | ## Document latest src/stl/vmod files/versions for the validation events | + | ## Document latest src/stl/vmod files/versions for the validation events: include file in release |
− | |||
# Site effect modules | # Site effect modules | ||
## Integrate Sediment Velocity Model (SVM) site response module into BBP | ## Integrate Sediment Velocity Model (SVM) site response module into BBP | ||
## Integrate Pedro Arduino site effects module into BBP | ## Integrate Pedro Arduino site effects module into BBP | ||
## Integrate Jeff Bayless site response module into BBP | ## Integrate Jeff Bayless site response module into BBP | ||
− | |||
# Other models | # Other models | ||
## Refine and test Irikura Phase 2 modules | ## Refine and test Irikura Phase 2 modules | ||
Line 41: | Line 35: | ||
## Perform 1d test with GMM-consistent 1d profile | ## Perform 1d test with GMM-consistent 1d profile | ||
## Update GP rupture generator to latest version from Arben (that changes slip distribution map to include asperities) | ## Update GP rupture generator to latest version from Arben (that changes slip distribution map to include asperities) | ||
− | |||
# Validation events | # Validation events | ||
## Add more Part-A events to BBP Platform Validation | ## Add more Part-A events to BBP Platform Validation |
Revision as of 20:14, 3 October 2019
- Done
- Create a new dev branch to start working on
- Create wiki list of validation events
- add bbp github wiki list of validation events
- Port the BBP to Python 3
- Validation event : Hector Mine
- Core
- Update BBP license to the BSD-3 license
- UCSB
- Help implementation of UCSB double corner
- Implement variable spacing for smaller GFs
- Convert rupture generator output to SRF format, add plots
- Integrate UCSB multi-fault rupture code
- Start with Landers
- Infrastructure
- Talk with Edric about the assets tracking
- Look at what file we can use to track bbp installs
- Ask Edric about google analytics information about scec.org/research/bbp or scecpedia/Broadband_Platform or any other google analytics we have
- standard/common github continuous integration toos
- software coverage measurement tools (check with ossian)
- Future Release
- Define reduced set of tests for BBP verification before release
- Document Science review process
- Document latest src/stl/vmod files/versions for the validation events: include file in release
- Site effect modules
- Integrate Sediment Velocity Model (SVM) site response module into BBP
- Integrate Pedro Arduino site effects module into BBP
- Integrate Jeff Bayless site response module into BBP
- Other models
- Refine and test Irikura Phase 2 modules
- Update multi-segment approach for GP and SDSU to compute seismograms in one simulation like Song and Irikura Method 1
- Draping rupture over complex faults in GP method
- GP (and potentially others) variability study in SRC (fault dimensions, magnitude, etc.)
- Add multi-segment functionality to Irikura Recipe Method 2
- Perform 1d test with GMM-consistent 1d profile
- Update GP rupture generator to latest version from Arben (that changes slip distribution map to include asperities)
- Validation events
- Add more Part-A events to BBP Platform Validation
- L’Aquila
- Christchurch
- Chi Chi
- Koaceli
- El Mayor
- Darfield
- Implement japanese GMPEs (Hiroe's e-mail from 2018-10-30)
- Start FAS-based validation
- BBP Sprint
- June 10th - July 31st
- Python 3
- Done: Working with Python 3.6
- SVM
- Done: Vs30-only implementation
- Done: available with all methods
- Done: validated with Part-A events (TBD by CG)
- Check UCSB availability
- Done: Schedule work for multi-segment, double corner, variable-spacing
- Continue adding validation events
- Done: Operations, running simulations
- Done: Part-A events as available from science teams
- Done: Add new regions as needed by new Part-A events
- Backup: Improve UCSB method (multi-segments/variable spacing)
- Backup: Start variability implementation using GP
- BBP Release
- Multi-segment Irikura 2
- UCSB multi-segment and variable spacing for smaller GFs
- New site-effects module (SVM)
- Python 3
- UCSB