Difference between revisions of "Broadband Product Backlog"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 48: | Line 48: | ||
=== 2020-02-01 - 2020-02-29 - BBP Sprint === | === 2020-02-01 - 2020-02-29 - BBP Sprint === | ||
− | # Create BBP simulation including complete set of data products | + | # Create Northridge BBP simulation using the GP method and including complete set of data products |
## Share results with CG | ## Share results with CG | ||
+ | # Run Landers and Hector Mine with GP and SDSU methods | ||
+ | ## Use both Mojave500 and Southern Sierra Nevada GFs | ||
+ | ## Share results with BBP group | ||
=== 2019-10-03 - 2019-10-31 - BBP Sprint === | === 2019-10-03 - 2019-10-31 - BBP Sprint === |
Revision as of 20:19, 13 March 2020
Contents
Pending tasks
- Core
- Update BBP Platform to use current compilers
- Update BBP license to the BSD-3 license
- UCSB
- Help implementation of UCSB double corner
- Implement variable spacing for smaller GFs
- Convert rupture generator output to SRF format, add plots
- Integrate UCSB multi-fault rupture code
- Start with Landers
- Infrastructure
- Talk with Edric about the assets tracking
- Look at what file we can use to track bbp installs
- Ask Edric about google analytics information about scec.org/research/bbp or scecpedia/Broadband_Platform or any other google analytics we have
- standard/common github continuous integration tools
- software coverage measurement tools (check with ossian)
- Future Release
- Define reduced set of tests for BBP verification before release
- Document Science review process
- Document latest src/stl/vmod files/versions for the validation events: include file in release
- Site effect modules
- Integrate Sediment Velocity Model (SVM) site response module into BBP
- Integrate Pedro Arduino site effects module into BBP
- Integrate Jeff Bayless site response module into BBP
- Other models
- Support SDSU frequency-dependent spatial correlation integration with the BBP
- Refine and test Irikura Phase 2 modules
- Update multi-segment approach for GP and SDSU to compute seismograms in one simulation like Song and Irikura Method 1
- Draping rupture over complex faults in GP method
- GP (and potentially others) variability study in SRC (fault dimensions, magnitude, etc.)
- Add multi-segment functionality to Irikura Recipe Method 2
- Perform 1d test with GMM-consistent 1d profile
- Update GP rupture generator to latest version from Arben (that changes slip distribution map to include asperities)
- Validation events
- Add more Part-A events to BBP Platform Validation
- L’Aquila
- Christchurch
- Chi Chi
- Koaceli
- El Mayor
- Darfield
- Implement japanese GMPEs (Hiroe's e-mail from 2018-10-30)
- Start FAS-based validation
Previous Sprints
2020-02-01 - 2020-02-29 - BBP Sprint
- Create Northridge BBP simulation using the GP method and including complete set of data products
- Share results with CG
- Run Landers and Hector Mine with GP and SDSU methods
- Use both Mojave500 and Southern Sierra Nevada GFs
- Share results with BBP group
2019-10-03 - 2019-10-31 - BBP Sprint
- Troubleshoot and finalize Vs30-based SVM site response module (verification)
- Done: Evaluate with all methods, user selects which site response module to use in simulation
- Done: Run all Part-A events and compare GP2014 and VS30 SeismoSoil results, share with modelers
- Support UCSB improvements to their method
- Double corner, average rupture velocity rules
- Done: Re-run Part-A events
- Continue validation event: L'Aquila
- Done: SRC/STL files, velocity model for all methods, with GFs and region parameters, all packaged for release
- Done: Run all methods, share results with groups, receive approval nod from each group
- Update Part-A validation packages with latest version from CG with updated Vs30s
- Done: Run Part-A validation for all methods/events, share results with CG, do not expect big changes
- Background: Update GP method to run multi-segment ruptures in a single pass
- Done: Run 3-segment Landers using new approach, compare results with previous runs
2019-06-10 - 2019-07-31 - BBP Sprint
- Python 3 *** Done: Working with Python 3.6
- SVM
- Done: Vs30-only implementation
- Done: available with all methods
- Done: validated with Part-A events (TBD by CG)
- Check UCSB availability
- Done: Schedule work for multi-segment, double corner, variable-spacing
- Continue adding validation events
- Done: Operations, running simulations
- Done: Part-A events as available from science teams
- Done: Add new regions as needed by new Part-A events
- Backup: Improve UCSB method (multi-segments/variable spacing)
- Backup: Start variability implementation using GP
Completed in Summer 2019 Sprint
- Create a new dev branch to start working on
- Create wiki list of validation events
- add bbp github wiki list of validation events
- Port the BBP to Python 3
- Validation event : Hector Mine
Tasks required for next BBP release
- BBP Release
- Multi-segment Irikura 2
- UCSB multi-segment and variable spacing for smaller GFs
- New site-effects module (SVM)
- Python 3
- UCSB