Difference between revisions of "Goodness of Fit"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
SCEC computational scientists often need to compare simulation parameters against observed geophysical and seismic observations. We often need to define what parameters we compare and how to evaluate groups of comparisons. | SCEC computational scientists often need to compare simulation parameters against observed geophysical and seismic observations. We often need to define what parameters we compare and how to evaluate groups of comparisons. | ||
Examples of Goodness of Fit in SCEC research includes Broadband Platform development, in the SCEC CVM development, in CISN EEW evaluation, and CSEP short term earthquake forecast testing. | Examples of Goodness of Fit in SCEC research includes Broadband Platform development, in the SCEC CVM development, in CISN EEW evaluation, and CSEP short term earthquake forecast testing. | ||
| − | |||
== Mayhew and Olsen == | == Mayhew and Olsen == | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
*Olsen, K.B., and J.E. Mayhew (2010). Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, With Application to the 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills, CA, Earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett., revised. | *Olsen, K.B., and J.E. Mayhew (2010). Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, With Application to the 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills, CA, Earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett., revised. | ||
* [http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~kbolsen/PUBL_dir/JOUR.html Kim Olsen's Site for Paper Download] | * [http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~kbolsen/PUBL_dir/JOUR.html Kim Olsen's Site for Paper Download] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Broadband Platform == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Broadband Platform]] | ||
| Line 16: | Line 20: | ||
*[[CVM Toolkit]] | *[[CVM Toolkit]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Other Goodness of Fit Measurements == | == Other Goodness of Fit Measurements == | ||
*[http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~kbolsen/PUBL_dir/srl_rev_ntc.pdf John Anderson 2004 Paper on Synthetics to Observations] | *[http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~kbolsen/PUBL_dir/srl_rev_ntc.pdf John Anderson 2004 Paper on Synthetics to Observations] | ||
Revision as of 03:34, 22 September 2010
SCEC computational scientists often need to compare simulation parameters against observed geophysical and seismic observations. We often need to define what parameters we compare and how to evaluate groups of comparisons. Examples of Goodness of Fit in SCEC research includes Broadband Platform development, in the SCEC CVM development, in CISN EEW evaluation, and CSEP short term earthquake forecast testing.
Mayhew and Olsen
Mayhew and Olsen have developed and published the following paper on goodness of fit for ground motion modeling groups.
- Olsen, K.B., and J.E. Mayhew (2010). Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, With Application to the 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills, CA, Earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett., revised.
- Kim Olsen's Site for Paper Download
Broadband Platform
CVM-T
SCEC CVM development involves improving the underlying earth structure model, adding new material databases like geotechnical layer information, and codes for meshing and populating large scale meshes.
