Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Fabio"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
** Results do not look good when using URS codebase for LF | ** Results do not look good when using URS codebase for LF | ||
* Initial analysis of space and time requirements for running Fling Study | * Initial analysis of space and time requirements for running Fling Study | ||
| − | ** Short summary: 1.7Tb and about 3 months :-(! | + | ** Short summary: 1.7Tb and about 3 months using only HPCC :-(! |
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
Revision as of 17:04, 25 May 2012
Contents
Yesterday:
- Call with Ronnie and Katie about Fling Study
- Ronnie will make changes to station lists, then we are good to go
- Reproduced Rumi's results using 11.2.3 and her scenarios
- Results do not look good when using URS codebase for LF
- Initial analysis of space and time requirements for running Fling Study
- Short summary: 1.7Tb and about 3 months using only HPCC :-(!
Today:
- Organize Fling Study information on the wiki, create progress tables
- Trac #95 (wiki updating)
- Test HPCC setup with Fling Study scenario 101 and compare result to Phil's run
- Meet with Phil and John Yu wrt Fling Study strategy
- Make trunk work both with and without site response
Ongoing:
- Look for ways to break up the GF directory layout, some ideas are:
- First candidate is removing the plot directory from the GF directory
- Create separate validation package
- Separate events and codebases from each other
Blocked:
- No
Followups:
- Meeting with John Yu and Phil @ TBD
