Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Fabio"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Yesterday: == | == Yesterday: == | ||
− | * | + | * checked gmpe_box_plot scripts into svn |
− | ** | + | * Created GMPE validation packages for all 12 GMPE scenarios |
− | * | + | ** Ready to run now on epicenter |
− | * | + | * Helped JB to get correct GFs for his simulations |
− | ** | + | * Call with CG and KA (and PM) about ExSim integration |
− | ** | + | ** Lots of user parameters |
− | * | + | ** Will use template configuration files |
+ | * Started design work for ExSim integration | ||
== Today: == | == Today: == | ||
* SVN commits | * SVN commits | ||
− | |||
** GMPE code | ** GMPE code | ||
− | * | + | * Start GMPE runs on epicenter |
+ | ** GP code first, then SDSU | ||
+ | * Update boxplot scripts to use NA's new acceptance rules | ||
* Add version numbers on validation packages and GFs | * Add version numbers on validation packages and GFs | ||
* Incorporate JC's changes to the UCSB rupture generator | * Incorporate JC's changes to the UCSB rupture generator | ||
Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
== Followups: == | == Followups: == | ||
− | * | + | * Broadband call @ 2pm |
Revision as of 18:15, 25 January 2013
Contents
Yesterday:
- checked gmpe_box_plot scripts into svn
- Created GMPE validation packages for all 12 GMPE scenarios
- Ready to run now on epicenter
- Helped JB to get correct GFs for his simulations
- Call with CG and KA (and PM) about ExSim integration
- Lots of user parameters
- Will use template configuration files
- Started design work for ExSim integration
Today:
- SVN commits
- GMPE code
- Start GMPE runs on epicenter
- GP code first, then SDSU
- Update boxplot scripts to use NA's new acceptance rules
- Add version numbers on validation packages and GFs
- Incorporate JC's changes to the UCSB rupture generator
- Use only 1 rupture generator for vertical and dipping faults
Blocked:
- No
Followups:
- Broadband call @ 2pm