Difference between revisions of "Staff Priorities - Fabio"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
** Results don't compare back to JAs data set, need to get updated synthetics from him | ** Results don't compare back to JAs data set, need to get updated synthetics from him | ||
* Broadband science call | * Broadband science call | ||
| − | ** | + | ** Showed results of 6 scenarios using GP and 3 scenarios using ExSIM |
** GP scenarios improved, ExSIM scenarios got slightly worse | ** GP scenarios improved, ExSIM scenarios got slightly worse | ||
| − | * Finished | + | * Finished metadata code |
** Use compile-time versions for compilers | ** Use compile-time versions for compilers | ||
** Tested everything | ** Tested everything | ||
Revision as of 18:29, 1 April 2013
Contents
Yesterday:
- Started working on Composite Source Model code
- Talked to JA, got input files and comparison seismograms
- Compiled fortran codes
- Ran codes manually
- Greens Functions, and Simulation code
- -O3 improves GF code performance by 40%, no changes to results, 10 stations/hr
- Simulation code takes about 1 minute per realization (40 stations)
- Results don't compare back to JAs data set, need to get updated synthetics from him
- Broadband science call
- Showed results of 6 scenarios using GP and 3 scenarios using ExSIM
- GP scenarios improved, ExSIM scenarios got slightly worse
- Finished metadata code
- Use compile-time versions for compilers
- Tested everything
- Code checked into svn
- Added start/end timestamps to BBP summary html file
Today:
- Start CSM Broadband module, automate manual steps
- Talk to JC about getting updated packages
- Generate a Mojave velocity model for RS
- Also other data files for her to test the SDSU pipeline
- Ping KA about updates
- E-mail CG about adding GMPE results to Part-A scenarios
Blocked:
- No
Followups:
- Call with JC @ tbd
