Difference between revisions of "BBP Validation 2020"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
** New validation metrics?
 
** New validation metrics?
 
* Group validation of RidgeCrest Earthquake Sequence
 
* Group validation of RidgeCrest Earthquake Sequence
 
  
 
== Group validation of RidgeCrest Earthquake Sequence ==  
 
== Group validation of RidgeCrest Earthquake Sequence ==  

Revision as of 22:30, 25 March 2020

Intro

We discussed the following focus areas to consider for 2020

  • Evaluate source variability and parameters space sensitivity
    • Will require more than 50 realizations maybe 200?
    • Focus in-close where path effects are not controlling the results (within 1 fault length)
      • M-A
      • Area changes (DDW only?)
      • Rupture velocity
      • Dip
      • Moment-rate (using duration)
  • Evaluate simulations for other metrics
    • Validation metrics that already exists (duration, inter-frequency correlation, Anderson GOF, etc.)?
    • New validation metrics?
  • Group validation of RidgeCrest Earthquake Sequence

Group validation of RidgeCrest Earthquake Sequence

  • New velocity model: South Sierra Nevada (ssn) TODO: post ppt from Rob (2/21/2020)
    • Need new GFs for UCSB and new crustal amps for EXSIM (completed 3/25/2020)
  • Use PEER dataset for ground motions.
    • Some are missing; PEER notified 2/19/2020.
  • Start with M5.4, then 6.4, then 7.1
    • M5.4 SRC from Graves (3/25/2020)