Difference between revisions of "CyberShake 1.0"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Study 1.0 began Thursday, April 16, 2009 at 11:40, and ended on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 at 06:03 (56.8 days; 1314.4 hrs) | Study 1.0 began Thursday, April 16, 2009 at 11:40, and ended on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 at 06:03 (56.8 days; 1314.4 hrs) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Workflow tools == | ||
| + | |||
| + | We used Condor glideins and clustering to reduce the number of submitted jobs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here's a schematic of the workflow: [[File:CyberShake_1.0_workflow_schematic.jpg]] | ||
== Performance Metrics == | == Performance Metrics == | ||
Revision as of 22:35, 16 March 2016
CyberShake 1.0 refers to our first CyberShake study which calculated a full hazard map (223 sites + 49 previously computed sites) for Southern California. This study used Graves & Pitarka (2007) rupture variations, Rob Graves' emod3d code for SGT generation, and the CVM-S velocity model. Both the SGTs and post-processing was done on TACC Ranger.
Data Products
Data products from this study are available here.
The Hazard Dataset ID for this study is 1.
Computational Status
Study 1.0 began Thursday, April 16, 2009 at 11:40, and ended on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 at 06:03 (56.8 days; 1314.4 hrs)
Workflow tools
We used Condor glideins and clustering to reduce the number of submitted jobs.
Here's a schematic of the workflow: 
