Difference between revisions of "CyberShake 1.2"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Replaced content with 'CyberShake 1.2 introduces the use of CyberShake hazard curves using CVM-H v11.2, with the original set of rupture variations. This requires recalculation of the SGTs.')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[CyberShake 1.2]] introduces the use of CyberShake hazard curves using CVM-H v11.2. This requires recalculation of the SGTs.  
+
[[CyberShake 1.2]] introduces the use of CyberShake hazard curves using CVM-H v11.2, with the original set of rupture variations. This requires recalculation of the SGTs.
 
 
[[CyberShake 1.1]] introduced a second generation rupture generator to the CyberShake calculation. Now, when we compare CyberShake hazard curves to one another, we must define both the CVM used (CVM-S4 or CVM-H), and which rupture set was used (CyberShake 1.0 or CyberShake 1.1).
 
 
 
The following curves compare CyberShake hazard curves that both use the CyberShake 1.1 rupture set. The differences between the curves are attributed to only the different CVM's used.
 
 
 
__TOC__
 
 
 
== Dual Comparison Results ==
 
 
 
black = CVM-H curve
 
 
 
gray = CVM-4 comparison curve
 
 
 
blue = Campbell & Borzorgnia (2008)
 
 
 
green = Boore & Atkinson (2008)
 
 
 
yellow = Chiou & Youngs (2008)
 
 
 
cyan = Abrahamson & Silva (2008)
 
 
 
{| border=1 padding=2
 
! Site !! Run ID !! Rupture Variation !! 3s SA curve !! Comparison curve with CVM-4
 
|-
 
| USC || 778 || 4 || [[File:USC_ERF35_Run778_SA_3sec_03_10_2011.png|thumb]] || [[File:USC_ERF35_Run778_CompToRun747_SA_3sec_03_10_2011.png|thumb]]
 
|-
 
| WNGC || 781 || 4 || [[File:WNGC_ERF35_Run781_SA_3sec_03_21_2011.png|thumb]] || [[File:WNGC_ERF35_Run781_CompToRun751_SA_3sec_03_21_2011.png|thumb]]
 
|-
 
| SBSM || 782 || 4 || [[File:SBSM_ERF35_Run782_SA_3sec_03_21_2011.png|thumb]] || [[File:SBSM_ERF35_Run782_CompToRun753_SA_3sec_03_21_2011.png|thumb]]
 
|-
 
| MBRD || 783 || 4 || [[File:MBRD_ERF35_Run783_SA_3sec_03_21_2011.png|thumb]] || [[File:MBRD_ERF35_Run783_CompToRun760_SA_3sec_03_21_2011.png|thumb]]
 
|-
 
| PACI || 784 || 4 || [[File:PACI_ERF35_Run784_SA_3sec_03_24_2011.png|thumb]] || [[File:PACI_ERF35_Run784_CompToRun764_SA_3sec_03_24_2011.png|thumb]]
 
|-
 
| PAS || 785 || 4 || [[File:PAS_ERF35_Run785_SA_3sec_04_07_2011.png|thumb]] || [[File:PAS_ERF35_Run785_CompToRun748_SA_3sec_04_07_2011.png|thumb]]
 
|-
 
| STNI || 786 || 4 || [[File:STNI_ERF35_Run786_SA_3sec_03_25_2011.png|thumb]] || [[File:STNI_ERF35_Run786_CompToRun790_SA_3sec_03_25_2011.png|thumb]]
 
|}
 
 
 
== Quad Comparison Results ==
 
 
 
 
 
black with circles = CVM-4 curve, old rupture variations
 
 
 
gray with circles = CVM-4 curve, new rupture variations
 
 
 
gray with triangles = CVM-H curve, old rupture variations
 
 
 
gray line = CVM-H curve, new rupture variations
 
 
 
blue = Campbell & Borzorgnia (2008)
 
 
 
green = Boore & Atkinson (2008)
 
 
 
yellow = Chiou & Youngs (2008)
 
 
 
cyan = Abrahamson & Silva (2008)
 
 
 
{| border=1 cellpadding=5
 
! Site !! Run IDs !! Comparison curve
 
|-
 
| s758 (near San Onofre) || 576, 789, 795, 788 || [[File:s758_ERF35_Run576_CompToRun789-795-788_SA_3sec_09_03_2009.png|thumb]]
 
|}
 

Latest revision as of 21:23, 6 June 2011

CyberShake 1.2 introduces the use of CyberShake hazard curves using CVM-H v11.2, with the original set of rupture variations. This requires recalculation of the SGTs.