Difference between revisions of "CyberShake Production Run"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
== Points to Finalize ==
 
== Points to Finalize ==
 
+
(1) Are the current [[CCA]]06 3D velocity model and 1D velocity model ready for use ?
# Are the current [[CCA]]06 3D velocity model and 1D velocity model ready for use ?
+
*http://scec.usc.edu/scecpedia/CyberShake_Study_16.9
# Are the full N.SAF and S.SAF CVMs ready for use, including interfaces between CVMs ?
+
(2) Do the CyberShake meshes produced by UCVM match the expected CVM models including min Vs floor and Vp/Vs ration ?
# Do the CyberShake meshes produced by UCVM match the expected CVM models including ?
+
*http://scec.usc.edu/scecpedia/CyberShake_Study_16.9 (min Vs, min Vp, min Rho, vp/vs > 1.45)
# Do we include the N. SAF events for sites within 200km, and exclude N.SAF events for sites more than 200km away ?
+
(3) Are the full N.SAF and S.SAF CVMs ready for use, including interfaces between CVMs ?
# Does the current CyberShake software stack on Blue Waters and Titan produce results equivalent to the [[CyberShake Study 15.4]] software stack ?
+
*http://scec.usc.edu/scecpedia/CyberShake_Study_16.9
 +
(4) Do we include the N. SAF events for sites within 200km, and exclude N.SAF events for sites more than 200km away ?
 +
* http://scec.usc.edu/scecpedia/CCA_N_SAF_Test
 +
(5) Does the current CyberShake software stack on Blue Waters and Titan produce results equivalent to the [[CyberShake Study 15.4]] software stack ?
 +
* Re-run S4.26 using current software stack for one site hazard curve.
  
 
== Related Entries ==
 
== Related Entries ==
 
*[[CyberShake]]
 
*[[CyberShake]]
 
*[[CME Project]]
 
*[[CME Project]]

Latest revision as of 22:05, 14 December 2016

Planning for the next CyberShake Production Run

Planned Production Run

Points to Finalize

(1) Are the current CCA06 3D velocity model and 1D velocity model ready for use ?

(2) Do the CyberShake meshes produced by UCVM match the expected CVM models including min Vs floor and Vp/Vs ration ?

(3) Are the full N.SAF and S.SAF CVMs ready for use, including interfaces between CVMs ?

(4) Do we include the N. SAF events for sites within 200km, and exclude N.SAF events for sites more than 200km away ?

(5) Does the current CyberShake software stack on Blue Waters and Titan produce results equivalent to the CyberShake Study 15.4 software stack ?

  • Re-run S4.26 using current software stack for one site hazard curve.

Related Entries