Difference between revisions of "CyberShake Status"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
== California Velocity Model ==
 
== California Velocity Model ==
 +
* Maechling, Magistrale discussion about CVM-S and state-wide CVM development (23 March 2011)
 
* State-wide CVM meeting with USR Harvard (10 March 2011)
 
* State-wide CVM meeting with USR Harvard (10 March 2011)
 
* Release of CVM-H with geotechnical Model (20 Feb 2011)
 
* Release of CVM-H with geotechnical Model (20 Feb 2011)
  
 
== CyberShake Parallel Code ==
 
== CyberShake Parallel Code ==
 +
* CyberShake working group call on Workflow monitoring (Dan Gunter, LBNL) and development of AWP-Olsen version of CyberShake code (23 March 2011)
 
* R.W. Graves SGT and seismogram synthesis code validated at 0.5Hz (April 2010)
 
* R.W. Graves SGT and seismogram synthesis code validated at 0.5Hz (April 2010)
  
 
== Automated Testing Framework ==
 
== Automated Testing Framework ==
 +
* Evaluation of Okaya simulation specification format (20 March 2011)
 
* Meeting at ISI on workflow-based Framework (16 March 2011)
 
* Meeting at ISI on workflow-based Framework (16 March 2011)
  
== Site Selection ==
+
== CyberShake Research Computing ==
* Candidate state-site list posted (2 Feb 2011)
+
* CyberShake 1.2 SGT calculations for multiple CyberShake site queued (21 March 2011) to get broader view of impact on hazard estimate using CVM-H v11.2 we will calculate approximate 10 hazard curve SGT. We will then calculate hazard curves using both 1.0 and 1.1 rupture models.
 +
* CyberShake 1.2 Calculation of USC hazard curve using CVM-H v11.2. Impact on hazard curve was to increase the hazard estimate for this site.
 +
* CyberShake 1.1 hazard curves using new Graves Rupture Generator. Impact on hazard curves from new rupture parametrization was, in general, to slightly reduce the hazard. (30 Jan 2011)

Revision as of 02:33, 24 March 2011

This page tracks progress in the primary CyberShake work areas.

Extended Earthquake Rupture Forecast

  • New version of CyberShake rupture generator integrated into CyberShake 1.2 study. (15 Feb 2011)

California Velocity Model

  • Maechling, Magistrale discussion about CVM-S and state-wide CVM development (23 March 2011)
  • State-wide CVM meeting with USR Harvard (10 March 2011)
  • Release of CVM-H with geotechnical Model (20 Feb 2011)

CyberShake Parallel Code

  • CyberShake working group call on Workflow monitoring (Dan Gunter, LBNL) and development of AWP-Olsen version of CyberShake code (23 March 2011)
  • R.W. Graves SGT and seismogram synthesis code validated at 0.5Hz (April 2010)

Automated Testing Framework

  • Evaluation of Okaya simulation specification format (20 March 2011)
  • Meeting at ISI on workflow-based Framework (16 March 2011)

CyberShake Research Computing

  • CyberShake 1.2 SGT calculations for multiple CyberShake site queued (21 March 2011) to get broader view of impact on hazard estimate using CVM-H v11.2 we will calculate approximate 10 hazard curve SGT. We will then calculate hazard curves using both 1.0 and 1.1 rupture models.
  • CyberShake 1.2 Calculation of USC hazard curve using CVM-H v11.2. Impact on hazard curve was to increase the hazard estimate for this site.
  • CyberShake 1.1 hazard curves using new Graves Rupture Generator. Impact on hazard curves from new rupture parametrization was, in general, to slightly reduce the hazard. (30 Jan 2011)