Difference between revisions of "GMSV Simulation Datasets"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
#Several LA region sites were selected, CyberShake ruptures identified, and then run in BBP. | #Several LA region sites were selected, CyberShake ruptures identified, and then run in BBP. | ||
#Specific simulations that were run for GMSV on the BBP. RWG designed the rupture descriptions and they were run by SCEC, including: | #Specific simulations that were run for GMSV on the BBP. RWG designed the rupture descriptions and they were run by SCEC, including: | ||
| − | + | ##Elysian Park | |
| − | + | ##So. San Andreas | |
| − | + | ##San Jacinto | |
| − | + | ##Hayward | |
| − | + | ##No. San Andreas | |
#A student working with FZ has been using the CyberShake results. Also, the GMSV group has used the BBP Part A & B results. | #A student working with FZ has been using the CyberShake results. Also, the GMSV group has used the BBP Part A & B results. | ||
#A student working with GB used data on shock. It has curve and disaggregation data, but no seismograms. The student used files on disk and copied over the specific seismograms he was interested in. He ran his own queries, and even ran the disaggregation scripts himself, to figure out which seismograms he wanted. This group was interested in a subset of CyberShake sites: ALP, HLL, LADT, LGB, LPER, MRVY, P1, PBWL, PDE, s351, SVD, WNGC, and SBSM. | #A student working with GB used data on shock. It has curve and disaggregation data, but no seismograms. The student used files on disk and copied over the specific seismograms he was interested in. He ran his own queries, and even ran the disaggregation scripts himself, to figure out which seismograms he wanted. This group was interested in a subset of CyberShake sites: ALP, HLL, LADT, LGB, LPER, MRVY, P1, PBWL, PDE, s351, SVD, WNGC, and SBSM. | ||
Revision as of 16:44, 1 February 2018
Data sets for upcoming SCEC/GMSV meeting:
Contents
GMSV group with data last March 2017
This includes Part-A data for Landers, Loma Prieta, Northridge, and North Palm Springs for all methods. Additionally, there's data for some Larger Magnitude events, like Elysian Park, Hayward, North and South San Andreas, and San Jacinto.
Full validation set of simulations (Parts A & B)
Results from BBP running Part A (comparison to GMPE) and Part B (comparison to historic events).
Discussion of Data Sets
Several data sets under discussion include:
- Several LA region sites were selected, CyberShake ruptures identified, and then run in BBP.
- Specific simulations that were run for GMSV on the BBP. RWG designed the rupture descriptions and they were run by SCEC, including:
- Elysian Park
- So. San Andreas
- San Jacinto
- Hayward
- No. San Andreas
- A student working with FZ has been using the CyberShake results. Also, the GMSV group has used the BBP Part A & B results.
- A student working with GB used data on shock. It has curve and disaggregation data, but no seismograms. The student used files on disk and copied over the specific seismograms he was interested in. He ran his own queries, and even ran the disaggregation scripts himself, to figure out which seismograms he wanted. This group was interested in a subset of CyberShake sites: ALP, HLL, LADT, LGB, LPER, MRVY, P1, PBWL, PDE, s351, SVD, WNGC, and SBSM.
