Difference between revisions of "Goodness of Fit"
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*[[CVM Toolkit]] | *[[CVM Toolkit]] | ||
| + | *[[CVM-H Acceptance Test Framework Validation]] | ||
== Other Goodness of Fit Measurements == | == Other Goodness of Fit Measurements == | ||
Revision as of 22:11, 29 September 2010
SCEC computational scientists often need to compare simulation parameters against observed geophysical and seismic observations. We often need to define what parameters we compare and how to evaluate groups of comparisons. Examples of Goodness of Fit in SCEC research includes Broadband Platform development, in the SCEC CVM development, in CISN EEW evaluation, and CSEP short term earthquake forecast testing.
Mayhew and Olsen
Mayhew and Olsen have developed and published the following paper on goodness of fit for ground motion modeling groups.
- Olsen, K.B., and J.E. Mayhew (2010). Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, With Application to the 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills, CA, Earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett., revised.
- Kim Olsen's Site for Paper Download
Broadband Platform
Broadband Platform has integrated a bias calculation comparing forecast peak ground motion amplitudes against observed peak amplitudes. These bias plots are calculated for validation events for different code bases.
CVM-T
SCEC CVM development involves improving the underlying earth structure model, adding new material databases like geotechnical layer information, and codes for meshing and populating large scale meshes.
