Difference between revisions of "Publications"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Recent Publications: ==
 
== Recent Publications: ==
# Maechling, P. J., F. Silva, S. Callaghan, and T. H. Jordan (2015). SCEC Broadband Platform: System Architecture and Software Implementation, Seismol. Res. Lett., 86, no. 1, doi: 10.1785/0220140125.
+
# Goulet, C.A., Abrahamson, N.A., Somerville, P.G. and K, E. Wooddell (2015) The SCEC Broadband Platform Validation Exercise: Methodology for Code Validation in the Context of Seismic-Hazard Analyses, Seismol. Res. Lett., 86, no. 1, doi: 10.1785/0220140104
 +
#Maechling, P. J., F. Silva, S. Callaghan, and T. H. Jordan (2015). SCEC Broadband Platform: System Architecture and Software Implementation, Seismol. Res. Lett., 86, no. 1, doi: 10.1785/0220140125.
 
# Dreger, D. S., G. C. Beroza, S. M. Day, C. A. Goulet, T. H. Jordan, P. A. Spudich, and J. P. Stewart (2015). Validation of the SCEC Broadband Platform V14.3 Simulation Methods Using Pseudospectral Acceleration Data, Seismol. Res. Lett., 86, no. 1, doi:10.1785/0220140118.
 
# Dreger, D. S., G. C. Beroza, S. M. Day, C. A. Goulet, T. H. Jordan, P. A. Spudich, and J. P. Stewart (2015). Validation of the SCEC Broadband Platform V14.3 Simulation Methods Using Pseudospectral Acceleration Data, Seismol. Res. Lett., 86, no. 1, doi:10.1785/0220140118.
  

Revision as of 02:49, 2 December 2014

Recent Publications:

  1. Goulet, C.A., Abrahamson, N.A., Somerville, P.G. and K, E. Wooddell (2015) The SCEC Broadband Platform Validation Exercise: Methodology for Code Validation in the Context of Seismic-Hazard Analyses, Seismol. Res. Lett., 86, no. 1, doi: 10.1785/0220140104
  2. Maechling, P. J., F. Silva, S. Callaghan, and T. H. Jordan (2015). SCEC Broadband Platform: System Architecture and Software Implementation, Seismol. Res. Lett., 86, no. 1, doi: 10.1785/0220140125.
  3. Dreger, D. S., G. C. Beroza, S. M. Day, C. A. Goulet, T. H. Jordan, P. A. Spudich, and J. P. Stewart (2015). Validation of the SCEC Broadband Platform V14.3 Simulation Methods Using Pseudospectral Acceleration Data, Seismol. Res. Lett., 86, no. 1, doi:10.1785/0220140118.

Publication List for 2014 Proposals

  1. Anderson, J. (2004). Quantitative Measure of the Goodness-of-fit of Synthetic Seismograms, in Proc. 13th World Conf. Earthquake Eng., Paper 243, Int. Assoc. Earthquake Eng., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  2. Anderson, J. (2014), The Composite Source Model for Broadband Simulations of Strong Ground Motions, submitted to Seismological Research Letters May 2014
  3. Anderson, J. G., and J. N. Brune (1999). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis without the ergodic assumption, Seismol. Res. Lett. 70, 19–28.
  4. Atkinson, G. and K. Assatourians (2014), Implementation and validation of EXSIM (a stochastic finite-fault ground-motion simulation algorithm) on the SCEC broadband platform, submitted to Seismological Research Letters May 2014
  5. Baker, J. W., Luco, N., Abrahamson, N. A., Graves, R. W., Maechling, P. J., Olsen, K. B. (2014) Engineering Uses of Physics-based Ground Motion Simulations, Tenth U.S. Conference on Earthquake Engineering, July 21-25, 2014, Anchorage Alaska
  6. Baker, J. W., and C. A. Cornell (2008). Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation, Structural Safety, 30. 236–252, doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.11.003.
  7. Bielak, J., H. Karaoglu, and R. Taborda (2011). Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation, Geophysics 76, no. 6, T131–T145, doi 10.1190/geo2011-0019.1.
  8. Bielak, J., R. W. Graves, K. B. Olsen, R. Taborda, L. Ramírez-Guzma´n, S. M. Day, G. P. Ely, D. Roten, T. H. Jordan, P. J. Maechling, J. Urbanic, Y. Cui, and G. Juve (2010). The ShakeOut earthquake scenario: Verification of three simulation sets, Geophys. J. Int. 180, no. 1, 375–404, doi 10.1111/j.1365-715 246X.2009.04417.x.
  9. Bielak, J., Y. Cui, S. M. Day, R. Graves, T. Jordan, P. Maechling, K. Olsen, and R. Taborda (2012). High frequency deterministic ground motion simulation (High-F project plan). Technical report, Southern California Earthquake Center. Available online at: http://scec.usc.edu/scecpedia/High-F (last accessed March 2014).
  10. Bijelic, N., Lin, T., and Deierlein, G. (2014). Seismic response of a tall building to recorded and simulated ground motions. Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (in press).
  11. Böse, M., R. Graves, D. Gill, S. Callaghan and P. Maechling (2014). CyberShake-Derived Ground-Motion Prediction Models for the Los Angeles Region with Application to Earthquake Early Warning, Geophys. J. Int., (accepted June 2014).
  12. Budnitz, R. J., Apostolakis, G., Boore, D. M., Cluff, L. S., Coppersmith, K. J., Cornell, C. A., Morris, P. A., 1997. Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee; Recommendations for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Electric Power Research Institute; NUREG/CR-6372, UCRL-ID-122160, Vol. 1-2.
  13. Callaghan, S., P. Maechling, P. Burks, L.S. and Baker, J.W. (2014). Validation of ground motion simulations through simple proxies for the response of engineered systems. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (in press).
  14. Burks, L.S., Zimmerman, R.B., and Baker, J.W. (2014). Evaluation of hybrid broadband ground motion simulations for response history analysis and design. Earthquake Spectra (in press).
  15. Small, K. Milner, G. Juve, T. H. Jordan, E. Deelman, G. Mehta, K. Vahi, D. Gunter, K. Beattie and C. Brooks (2011). Metrics for heterogeneous scientific workflows: A case study of an earthquake science application, International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications 2011, 25: 274, doi: 10.1177/1094342011414743.
  16. Chourasia, A. (2010), GlyphSea, ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Computer Animation Fesitval (Los Angeles, California, July 26 - 30, 2010). SIGGRAPH '10. ACM, New York, NY, 111-111.
  17. Christen, M., O. Schenk, and Y. Cui (2012), PATUS: Parallel Auto-Tuned Stencils For Scalalble Earthquake Simulation Codes, SC12, Salt Lake City, Nov 10-16, 2012.
  18. Computational Science: Ensuring America’s Competitiveness (2005). The President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee (PITAC)
  19. Couvares, P., T. Kosar, A. Roy, J. Weber and K Wenger (2007). Workflow in Condor, In Workflows for e-Science, Editors: I. Taylor, E. Deelman, D. Gannon, M. Shields, Springer Press, January 2007, ISBN: 1-84628-519-4.
  20. Crempien, J. and R. J. Archuleta (2014), UCSB Method for Broadband Ground Motion from Kinematic Simulations of Earthquakes, submitted to Seismological Research Letters May 2014
  21. Cui, Y., A. Chourasia, R. Moore, K. B. Olsen, P. Maechling, and T. H. Jordan (2009), The TeraShake computational platform for large-scale earthquake simulations, Advances in Geocomputing: Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, vol. 119, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp 229-278, 2009
  22. Cui, Y., R. Moore, K. B. Olsen, A. Chourasia, P. Maechling, B. Minster, S. Day, Y. Hu, J. Zhu, A. Majumdar & T. H. Jordan (2008), Towards petascale earthquake simulations, Acta Geotechnica, Springer, doi:10.1007/s11440-008-0055-2.
  23. Cui, Y., K. B. Olsen, T. H. Jordan, K. Lee, J. Zhou, P. Small, D. Roten, G. P. Ely, D. K. Panda, A. Chourasia, J. Levesque, S. M. Day & P. J. Maechling (2010), Scalable earthquake simulation on petascale supercomputers, in Proceedings of the 2010 ACM/IEEE International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage, and Analysis, New Orleans, Nov. 13-19, doi:10.1109/SC.2010.45 (ACM Gordon Bell Finalist).
  24. Cui, Y., E. Poyraz, K.B. Olsen, J. Zhou, K. Withers, S. Callaghan, J. Larkin, C. Guest, D. Choi, A. Chourasia, Z. Shi, S.M. Day, J.P. Maechling, and T.H. Jordan (2013a). Physics-based seismic hazard analysis on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers, Procs, Supercomputing Conference, 2013.
  25. Cui, Y., Poyraz, E., Callaghan, S., Maechling, P., Chen, P. and Jordan, T. (2013b), Accelerating CyberShake Calculations on XE6/XK7 Platforms of Blue Waters, Extreme Scaling Workshop 2013, August 15-16, Boulder.
  26. Deelman, E., G. Singh, M.-H. Su, J. Blythe, Y. Gil, C. Kesselman, G. Mehta, K. Vahi, G. B. Berriman, J. Good, A. Laity, J. C. Jacob and D. S. Katz (2005). Pegasus: a framework for mapping complex scientific workflows onto distributed systems. Scientific Programming, 13(3), 219-237.
  27. Dreger, D., G. Beroza, S. Day, C. Goulet, P. Spudich, J. Stewart, and T. Jordan (2014), Evaluation of SCEC Broadband Platform Phase 1 Pseudo Spectral Acceleration Ground Motion Simulation Results, submitted to Seismological Research Letters May 2014
  28. Dreger, D., Beroza, G. C., Day, S. M., Goulet, C. A., Jordan, T. H., Spudich, P., and Stewart, J. P. (2013). Evaluation of SCEC Broadband Platform Phase 1 Ground Motion Simulation Results. Southern California Earthquake Center Report, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  29. Ely, G. P., S. M. Day, and J.-B. Minster (2010). Dynamic rupture models for the southern San Andreas fault, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 100 (1), 131-150, doi:10.1785/0120090187.
  30. Federal Plan for High-end Computing: Report of the High-end Computing Revitalization Task Force (2004). Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy.
  31. FEMA (2000). HAZUS 99, estimated annualized earthquake losses for the United States, Federal Emergency Management Agency Report 366, Washington, D.C., September, 32 pp.
  32. Goldstein, M. (2013). Observables and models: exchangeability and the inductive argument, in Bayesian Theory and Its Applications, ed. P. Damien, P. Dellaportas, N. G. Olson, and D. A. Stephens, Oxford, pp. 3-18.
  33. Goulet, C. (2014), Summary of a Large Scale Validation Project Using the SCEC Broadband Strong Ground Motion Simulation Platform, Seism. Res. Lett., SSA Annual Mtg 2014, Anchorage, AK.
  34. Goulet, C. and N. A. Abrahamson (2014), The SCEC Broadband Platform validation exercise: methodology for code validation in the context of seismic hazard analyses, submitted to Seismological Research Letters May 2014
  35. Graves, R. and A. Pitarka (2014), Refinements to the Graves and Pitarka (2010) Broadband Ground Motion Simulation Method, submitted to Seismological Research Letters May 2014
  36. Graves, R., B. Aagaard, K. Hudnut, L. Star, J. Stewart and T. H. Jordan (2008). Broadband simulations for Mw 7.8 southern San Andreas earthquakes: Ground motion sensitivity to rupture speed, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L22302, doi: 10.1029/2008GL035750.
  37. Graves, R., T. H. Jordan, S. Callaghan, E. Deelman, E. Field, G. Juve, C. Kesselman, P. Maechling, G. Mehta, K. Milner, D. Okaya, P. Small and K. Vahi (2011). CyberShake: A physics-based seismic hazard model for Southern California. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 168(3), 367-381.
  38. Hauksson, E. and P. M. Shearer (2006), Attenuation models (QP and QS) in three dimensions of the southern California crust: Inferred fluid saturation at seismogenic depths, J. Geophys. Res., 111, B05302, doi:10.1029/2005JB003947.
  39. He, Xuebin et al., Cross-layer Semantics- and Application-aware Systems Support for Data Analytics and Visualization, proposal submitted to BigData program, June 9, 2014.
  40. Isbiliroglu, Y., R. Taborda, and J. Bielak (2013). Coupled soil-structure interaction effects of building clusters during earthquakes, Earthquake Spectra, in press, doi 10.1193/102412EQS315M.
  41. Kempton, J.J. and Stewart, J.P. (2006). Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects. Earthquake Spectra, 27(2), 331-350.
  42. Komatitsch, D., and J. Tromp (2002). Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation—I. Validation, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 390-412; Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation—II. Three-dimensional models, oceans, rotation and self-gravitation, Geophys. J. Int., 150, 308–318.
  43. Langou, J., Chen, Z., Bosilca, G. and Dongarra, J., Recovery Patterns for Iterative Methods in a Parallel Unstable Environment, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 30(1), 102-116, 2007.
  44. Lee, E., Chen, P., and Jordan, T. H. (2014) Testing Waveform Predictions of 3D Velocity Models Against Two Recent Los Angeles Earthquakes, submitted to Seismological Research Letters.
  45. Lee, E., Chen, P., Jordan, T. H., Maechling, P. J., Denolle, M., and Beroza, G.C., 2014. Full-3D Tomography (F3DT) for Crustal Structure in Southern California Based on the Scattering-Integral (SI) and the Adjoint-Wavefield (AW) Methods, Journal of Geophysical Research, in review.
  46. Lee, E.-J., H. Huang, J. M. Dennis, P. Chen, and L. Wang (2013), An optimized parallel LSQR algorithm for seismic tomography, Comput. Geosci., 61, 184–197, doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2013.08.013.
  47. Lee, E.-J., and P. Chen (2013), Automating seismic waveform analysis for full 3-D waveform inversions, Geophys. J. Int., 194(1), 572–589, doi:10.1093/gji/ggt124.
  48. Lee, E.-J., P. Chen, T. H. Jordan, and L. Wang (2011), Rapid full-wave centroid moment tensor (CMT) inversion in a three-dimensional earth structure model for earthquakes in Southern California, Geophys. J. Int., 186(1), 311–330, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05031.x.
  49. Luco N., Jordan T.H. & Rezaeian, S. (2013). Progress of the Southern California Earthquake Center Technical Activity Group on Ground Motion Simulation Validation. Seismological Research Letters, 84(2).
  50. Maechling, P., Silva, F., Callaghan, S., Jordan, T.H. (2014) SCEC Broadband Platform: System Architecture and Software Implementation, Seism. Res. Lett., submitted May 2014
  51. McQuinn, E., Chourasia, A., Minster, J. H. & Schulze, J. (2010). GlyphSea: Interactive Exploration of Seismic Wave Fields Using Shaded Glyphs, Abstract IN23A-1351, presented at the 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, CA, 13-17 Dec.
  52. Mu, D., Chen, P. and Wang, L., Accelerating the discontinuous Galerkin method for seismic wave propagation simulations using the graphic processing unit (GPU) – single-GPU implementation, Computers and Geosciences, 51, 282-292, 2013.
  53. National Research Council (2004). Getting Up to Speed: The Future of Supercomputing. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  54. Olsen, K.B., and R. Takedatsu (2014). The SDSU Broadband Ground Motion Generation Module BBtoolbox Version 1.5, Seism. Res. Lett., submitted May 2014.
  55. Olsen, K. B., R. J. Archuleta & J. R. Matarese (1995). Three-dimensional simulation of a magnitude 7.75 earthquake on the San Andreas fault, Science, 270, 1628-1632.
  56. Olsen, K.B., S. M. Day & C. R. Bradley (2003), Estimation of Q for long period (>2 s) waves in the Los Angeles Basin, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 93, 627-638.
  57. Olsen, K.B. and J.E. Mayhew (2010). Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, with Application to the 2008 Mw 5.4 Chino Hills, California, Earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett. 85, 5, 715–723, doi 10.1785/gssrl.81.5.715.
  58. Pasyanos, M. E. (2013). A lithospheric attenuation model of North America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 103, 1-13, doi:10.1785/0120130122.
  59. Peter, D., D. Komatitsch, Y. Luo, R. Martin, N. Le Goff, E. Casarotti, P. Le Loher, F. Magnoni, Q. Liu, C. Blitz, T. Nissen-Meyer, P. Basini & J. Tromp (2011). Forward and adjoint simulations of seismic wave propagation on fully unstructured hexahedral meshes, Geophys. J. Int., 186, 721-739.
  60. Petersen, M. D., A. D. Frankel, S. C. Harmsen, C. S. Mueller, K. M. Haller, R. L. Wheeler, R. L. Wesson, Y. Zeng, O. S. Boyd, D. M. Perkins, N. Luco, E. H. #Field, C. J. Wills and K. S. Rukstales (2008). Documentation for the 2008 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps, U. S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1128.
  61. Porter, K., L. Jones, D. Cox, J. Golkz, K. Hudnut, D. Mileti, S. Perry, D. Ponti, M. Reichle, A.Z. Rose, et al. (2011), The ShakeOut scenario: A hypothetical Mw7.8 earthquake on the southern San Andreas fault, Earthquake Spectra, 27(2), 239-261.
  62. Potluri, S., P. Lai, K. Tomko, S. Sur, Y. Cui, M. Tatineni, K. Schulz, W. Barth, A. Majumdar, and D. K. Panda, Quantifying performance benefits of overlap using MPI-2 in a seismic modeling application, Proceedings of the 24th ACM Int'l Conference on Supercomputing, 2010, pp. 17-25, doi: 10.1145/1810085.1810092
  63. Poyraz, E., Xu, Heming and Cui, Y. (2014). I/O Optimziations for High Performance Scientific Applications. ICCS’14, Cairns, June 10-12 (accepted).
  64. Restrepo, D. and J. Bielak (2014). Virtual Topography–A fictitious domain approach for analyzing surface irregularities in large-scale earthquake ground motion simulation, Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. (in revision).
  65. Restrepo, D., R. Taborda, and J. Bielak (2012a). Effects of soil nonlinearity on ground response in 3D simulations — An application to the Salt Lake City basin, in Proc. 4th IASPEI/IAEE Int. Symp. Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, University of California, Santa Barbara, August 23–26.
  66. Restrepo, D., R. Taborda, and J. Bielak (2012b). Simulation of the 1994 Northridge earthquake including nonlinear soil behavior, in Proc. SCEC Annu. Meet., Abstract GMP-015, Palm Springs, CA, September 9–12.
  67. Reynolds, C. J., S. Winter, G. Z. Terstyanszk, T. Kiss (2011). Scientific workflow makespan reduction through cloud augmented desktop grids, Third IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science.
  68. Rezaeian, S., Zareian, F. & Zong, P. (2013). Validation of Simulated Ground Motions Based on Evolution of Intensity and Frequency Content. Southern California Earthquake Center Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, California.
  69. Roten, D., K.B. Olsen, S.M. Day, Y. Cui, and D. Fah (2014), Expected seismic shaking in Los Angeles reduced by San Andreas fault zone plasticity, Geophysical Research Letters, 41, doi:10.1002/2014GL059411, 2014
  70. Rynge, M., G. Juve, K. Vahi, S. Callaghan, G. Mehta, P. J. Maechling, E. Deelman (2012). Enabling Large-scale Scientific Workflows on Petascale Resources Using MPI Master/Worker", XSEDE12, Article 49.
  71. Savran, W., and K.B. Olsen (2014). Deterministic simulation of the Mw Chino Hills event with frequency-dependent attenuation, heterogeneous velocity structure, and realistic source model, Seism. Res. Lett., SSA Annual Mtg, Anchorage, AK.
  72. ShakeOut Special Volume (2011), Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 27, No. 2.
  73. Shi, Z., and S.M. Day (2012a). Ground motions from large-scale dynamic rupture simulations (poster 023), SCEC Annual Meeting, Palm Springs.
  74. Shi, Z., and S.M. Day (2012b), Characteristics of ground motions from large-scale dynamic rupture simulations, Abstract S14A-06, presented at the 2012 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, 3-7 Dec.
  75. Shi, Z, and S.M. Day (2013a). Validation of dynamic rupture simulations for high-frequency ground motion, Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 84.
  76. Shi, Z., and S. M. Day (2013b). Rupture dynamics and ground motion from 3-D rough-fault simulations, Journal of Geophysical research, 118, 1–20, doi:10.1002/jgrb.50094.
  77. Strasser, F. O., N. A. Abrahamson, and J. J. Bommer (2009). Sigma: issues, insights, and challenges, Seismol. Res. Lett. 80, 40–56.
  78. Stein S., R. Geller and M. Liu (2012). Why earthquake hazard maps often fail and what to do about it, Tectonophysics, 562-563, 1-25, doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2012.06.047.
  79. Stewart, J. and Afshari, K. (2014). Validation of simulated ground motions relative to seismic geotechnical engineering demand parameters. Southern #California Earthquake Center Annual Report (http://sceccore2.usc.edu/proposalfiles/2012reports/Stewart_12121_report.pdf).
  80. Taborda, R. and J. Bielak (2013). Ground-motion simulation and validation of the 2008 Chino Hills, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103, no. 1, 131–156, doi 10.1785/0120110325.
  81. Taborda, R. and J. Bielak (2014). Ground-motion simulation and validation of the 2008 Chino Hills, California, earthquake using different velocity models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., in revision.
  82. Taborda, R., and J. Bielak (2011). Large-scale earthquake simulation — Computational seismology and complex engineering systems, Comput. Sci. Eng. 13, 14–26, doi 10.1109/MCSE.2011.19.
  83. Taborda, R., J. Bielak, and D. Restrepo (2012). Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation Including Nonlinear Soil Effects Under Idealized Conditions with Application to Two Case Studies, Seismol. Res. Lett. 83, no. 6, 1047–1060, doi 10.1785/0220120079.
  84. Taborda, R., J. López, H. Karaoglu, J. Urbanic, and J. Bielak (2010). Speeding up finite element wave propagation for large-scale earthquake simulations. Technical Report CMU-PDL-10-109, available at http://www.pdl.cmu.edu/Publications/pubs-tr.shtml.
  85. The Opportunities and Challenges of Exascale Computing (2010). Summary Report of the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) Subcommittee on Exascale Computing, Department of Energy, Office of Science, Fall 2010.
  86. Tu, T., H. Yu, L. Ramírez-Guzmán, J. Bielak, O. Ghattas, K.-L. Ma, and D. R. O’Hallaron (2006). From mesh generation to scientific visualization: An end-to-end approach to parallel supercomputing, in SC’06: Proc. of the 2006 ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, Tampa, Florida, pp. 15. available at http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1188455.1188551 (last 832 accessed March 2014), doi 10.1145/1188455.1188551.
  87. Unat, D., Zhou, J., Cui, Y., Cai, X. and Baden, S., Accelerating an Earthquake Simulation with a C-to-CUDA Translator, Journal of Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 14, No. 3, 48-58, May/June, CiSESI-2011-09-0094, May, 2012. doi.10.1109/MCSE.2012.44.
  88. Wang, F., and T. H. Jordan (2014), Comparison of probabilistic seismic hazard models using averaging-based factorization, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., in press.
  89. Withers, K.B., K.B. Olsen, Z. Shi, S.M. Day, and R. Takedatsu (2013a). Deterministic high-frequency ground motions from simulations of dynamic rupture along rough faults, , Seismol. Res. Lett., 84:2, 334.
  90. Withers, K.B., K.B. Olsen, and S.M. Day (2013b), Deterministic high-frequency ground motion using dynamic rupture along rough faults, small-scale media heterogeneities, and frequency-dependent attenuation (Abstract 085), SCEC Annual Meeting, Palm Springs.
  91. Withers, K.B., K.M. Olsen, Z. Shi, R. Takedatsu, and S.M. Day (2012), Deterministic high-frequency ground motions from simulations of dynamic rupture along rough faults (Poster 019), SCEC Annual Meeting, Palm Springs.
  92. Zhou, J., Didem, U., Choi, D., Guest, C. & Y. Cui (2012). Hands-on Performance Tuning of 3D Finite Difference Earthquake Simulation on GPU Fermi Chipset, Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science, Vol. 9, 976-985, Elesvier, ICCS 2012, Omaha, Nebraska, June 4-6.
  93. Zhou, J., Y. Cui, E. Poyraz, D. Choi, and C. Guest (2013), Multi-GPU implementation of a 3D finite difference time domain earthquake code on heterogeneous supercomputers. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science, Vol. 18, 1255-1264, Elesvier, ICCS 2013, Barcelona, June 5-7.

Publication List for 2013 Progress Report

Publication List:

  1. Bielak, J., Karaoglu, H., Taborda, R. (2011). Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation. Geophysics, 76(6), T131–T145. doi: 10.1190/geo2011-0019.1.
  2. Boese, M., Graves, R W., Callaghan, S., Maechling, P J. (2012) Site-specific Ground-Motion Predictions for Earthquake Early Warning in the LA Basin using CyberShake Simulations Abstract S53B-2498 Poster presented at 2012 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 3-7 Dec.
  3. Callaghan, S., P. Maechling, K. Vahi, G. Juve, E. Deelman, Y. Cui, E. Poyraz, T. H. Jordan (2013) Running A Seismic Workflow Application on Distributed Resources, SC13, Denver, Nov 17-22, 2013 (Poster accepted for presentation)
  4. Callaghan, S., Maechling, P., Gideon Juve, Karan Vahi, Robert W. Graves, Kim B. Olsen, David Gill, Kevin Milner, John Yu and Thomas H. Jordan (2013) Running CyberShake Seismic Hazard Workflows on Distributed HPC Resources, SCEC Annual Meeting 2013, abstract 195, Sept 8 – 11, 2013, Palm Springs, CA
  5. Callaghan, S., Maechling, P J., Milner, K., Graves, R W., Donovan, J., Wang, F., Jordan, T H (2012) CyberShake: Broadband Physics-Based Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis in Southern California Abstract S51A-2405 presented at 2012 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 3-7 Dec.
  6. Chavez, M., K. B. Olsen, E. Cabrera, and N. Perea (2011). Observations and Modeling of Strong Ground Motions for the 9 October 1995 Mw 8 Colima-Jalisco, Mexico, Earthquake, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 101, 1979-2000.
  7. Chourasia, A., Zhou, J., Cui, Y., Choi, DJ, Olsen, K. (2012) Role of visualization in porting a seismic simulation from CPU to GPU architecture (Visualization Showcase), XSEDE’12, Chicago, July 16-20, 2012.
  8. Chourasia, Amit, E. McQuinn, B. Minster and J. Schulze (2011) Glyphsea: An Application to Visualize Vector Data http://visservices.sdsc.edu/projects/scec/vectorviz/glyphsea/
  9. Christen, M., O. Schenk, and Y. Cui (2012) PATUS for Convenient High-Performance Stencils: Evaluation in Earthquake Simulations, Technical Paper, SC12, Salt Lake City, Nov 10-16, 2012.
  10. Cui, Y., E. Poyraz, K. Olsen, J. Zhou, K. Withers, S. Callaghan, J. Larkin, C. Guest, D. Choi, A. Chourasia, Z. Shi, S. Day, P. Maechling, and T. H. Jordan (2013), Physics-based seismic hazard analysis on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers, SC13, Denver, Nov 17-22, 2013 (accepted for publication)
  11. Cui, Y., E. Poyraz, J. Zhou, S. Callaghan, P. Maechling, T. H. Jordan, L. Shih, and P. Chen (2013), Accelerating CyberShake Calculations on the XK7 Platform of Blue Waters, Extreme Scaling Workshop, Denver, August 15-16, 2013
  12. Cui, Y., K.B. Olsen, J. Zhou, P. Small, A. Chourasia, S.M. Day, P.J. Maechling, T.H. Jordan. (2012). Development and optimizations of a SCEC community anelastic wave propagation platform for multicore systems and GPU-based accelerators, Seism. Res. Lett. Seism. Res. Lett. 83:2, 396.
  13. Cui, Y., Olsen, K., Jordan, T., Lee, K., Zhou, J., Small, P., Ely, G., Roten, D., Panda, DK, Chourasia, A., Levesque, J., Day, S. and Maechling, P. (2010) Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers, Gordon Bell Finalist, Supercomputing’10, 1-20, New Orleans, Nov, 2010.
  14. Cui, Y. (2010) Looking forward to Architecture Changes with Seismic Wave Propagation Using a 3D Finite Difference Code, Int'l Conference of Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, pp. 1781, edited by T. E. Simos, G. Psihoyios, and Ch. Tsitouras, Rhodes, Greece, 19-25 September 2010.
  15. Day, S.M., D. Roten, and K.B. Olsen (2012). Adjoint analysis of the source and path sensitivities of basin-guided waves, Geophys. J. Int. , Vol 189, pp. 1103-1124, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05416.x
  16. Day, S.M., K.B. Olsen, and Y. Cui (2011). Large-scale earthquake simulations and the prediction of strong ground motion (invited talk), SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences, March 21-24, 2011, Long Beach.
  17. Donovan, J., T. H. Jordan, and J. N. Brune (2012). Testing CyberShake using precariously balanced rocks, 2012 Annual Meeting of the Southern California Earthquake Center, Palm Springs, Abstract 026, September, 2012.
  18. Donovan, J., and T. H. Jordan (2013). Forecasting The Rupture Directivity Of Large Earthquakes: Constraints From Observations And Earthquake Simulators, Seismological Society of America Meeting, April 17-19 2013, Salt Lake City, SRL (Vol. 84, No. 2)
  19. Ely, G., (2013c) Kernel Optimizations in SORD Earthquake Dynamic Rupture Code, Mira Community Conference, Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, March 7, 2013
  20. Ely, G., (2013b) Threads in SORD Earthquake Dynamic Rupture Code, Mira Community Conference, Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, March 6, 2013
  21. Ely, G., (2013a) The SORD Code for Rupture Dynamics, SIAM Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, Boston, Feb 25-Mar 1, 2013
  22. Ely, G., (2012) Improving Earthquake Ground Motion Estimates with Blue Gene/Q, SIAM Annual Meeting, July 9-13, 2012
  23. Field, E., Dawson, T.E., et al. (2012) Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3) Framework, Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (WGCEP) Technical Report #8 July 9, 2012
  24. Gill, D., Maechling, P., Jordan, T., Taborda, R., Callaghan, S. and Small, P. (2013). SCEC Unified Community Velocity Model: Mesh Generation and Visualization. In Proc. CIG/QUEST/IRIS Joint Workshop on Seismic Imaging of Structure and Source, Poster. Fairbanks, Alaska, July 14–17.
  25. Isbiliroglu, Y. and Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2013). Coupled Soil-Structure Interaction Effects of Building Clusters During Earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra (accepted for publication)
  26. Isbiliroglu, Y. D. and Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2012). Dynamic Response and Ground- Motion Effects of Building Clusters During Large Earthquakes. In Proc. AGU Annu. Meet. Poster S51A-2404. San Francisco, California, December 3–7.
  27. Isbiliroglu, Y. D. and Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2012). Dynamic Response and Ground- Motion Effects of Building Clusters During Large Magnitude Earthquakes. In Proc. SSA Annu. Meet. Poster. San Diego, California, April 17–19.
  28. Jordan, T. H. (2013) Progress Of The Southern California Earthquake Center Technical Activity Group On Ground Motion Simulation Validation, Seismological Society of America Meeting, April 17-19 2013, Salt Lake City, SRL (Vol. 84, No. 2)
  29. Jordan, T H., Callaghan, S., Maechling, P J., Juve, G., Deelman, E., Rynge, M., Vahi, K., Silva, F. (2012) Workflow Management of the SCEC Computational Platforms for Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Analysis Abstract IN54B-07 presented at 2012 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 3-7 Dec.
  30. Lee, E., Chen, P., Jordan, T. H., Maechling, P. J., Denolle,M., and Beroza, G. C. (2013) Full-3d Waveform Tomography For Southern California, Seismological Society of America Meeting, April 17-19 2013, Salt Lake City, SRL (Vol. 84, No. 2, p. 316)
  31. Lee, E. & Chen, P. (2013). Automating Seismic Waveform Analysis for Full-3D Waveform Inversions. Geophys. J. Int. 194 (1): 572-589.
  32. Lee, E., Huang, H., Dennis, J. M., Chen, P., & Wang, L. (2013) An optimized parallel LSQR algorithm for large-scale seismic tomography (submitted to Computers & Geosciences).
  33. Lee, E., Chen, P., Jordan, T H., Maechling, P J., Denolle, M., Beroza, G C. (2012) Full-3D Waveform Tomography for Southern California, Abstract S34B-04 presented at 2012 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 3-7 Dec.
  34. Maechling, P. and Gill, D. and Small, P. and Ely, G. and Taborda, R. and Jordan, T. (2013). SCEC Unified Community Velocity Model: Development Goals and Current Status. In Proc. CIG/QUEST/IRIS Joint Workshop on Seismic Imaging of Structure and Source. Fairbanks, Alaska, July 14–17.
  35. Maechling, P. (2013) Using Multi-scale Dynamic Rupture Models to Improve Ground Motion Estimates, ALCF Early Science Program Workshop, 15-16 May 2013
  36. Milner, K.R., Thomas H. Jordan (2013), Rupture Synchronicity in Complex Fault Systems, SCEC Annual Meeting 2013, abstract 262, Sept 9 – 12, 2013, Palm Springs, CA
  37. Olsen, K. B., W. Savran, B. H. Jacobsen (2013), Ground motion prediction from low-velocity sediments including statistical models of inhomogeneities in Southern California basins, Seismol. Res. Lett., 84:2, 334.
  38. Olsen, K.B., B.H. Jacobsen, R. Takedatsu. (2012). Validation of broadband synthetic seismograms with earthquake engineering-relevant metrics, Seism. Res. Lett.
  39. Olsen, K.B., and J. Mayhew (2010). Goodness-of-fit criteria for broadband synthetic seismograms, with application to the 2008 Mw 5.4 Chino Hills, California, earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 81,5 715-723.
  40. Olsen, K.B., and J.E. Mayhew (2010). Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, With Application to the 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills, CA, Earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 81 , 715-723.
  41. Olsen, K.B., and G. Ely (2009). WebSims: A Web-based System for Storage, Visualization, and Dissemination of Earthquake Ground Motion Simulations, Seismol. Res. Lett. 80, 1002-1007, doi:10.1785/gssrl.80.6.1002
  42. Restrepo, D. (2013). Effects of Topography on 3D Seismic Ground Motion Simulation with an Application to the Valley of Aburra in Antioquia, Colombia. Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, October, Pittsburgh, PA.
  43. Restrepo, D. and Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2012). Simulation of the 1994 Northridge earthquake including nonlinear soil behavior. In Proc. SCEC Annu. Meet. Poster GMP-015. Palm Springs, California, September 9–12.
  44. Roten, D., Olsen, K.B., Day, S.M., Dalguer, L.A. and Fäh, D. (2013). Large-scale 3-D Simulations of Spontaneous Rupture and Wave Propagation in Complex, Nonlinear Media, Annual Meeting of the Seismological Society of America 17-19 April, 2013, Salt Lake City, UT
  45. Roten, D., K. B. Olsen, J. C. Pechmann, V. M. Cruz-Atienza, and H. Magistrale (2011). 3D Simulations of M 7 Earthquakes on the Wasatch Fault, Utah, Part I: Long- Period Ground Motion, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 101, 2045-2063
  46. Roten, D., K. B. Olsen, J. C. Pechmann (2012). 3D Simulations of M 7 Earthquakes on the Wasatch Fault, Utah, Part II: Broadband (0-10Hz) Ground Motions and Nonlinear Soil Behavior (2012). Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 102, 2008-2030.
  47. Roten, D., and K.B. Olsen (2010). Simulation of Long-Period Ground Motion in the Imperial Valley Area during the Mw 7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah Earthquake, abstract S51A-1920 poster presented at the 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, CA.
  48. Shi, Z., and S. M. Day (2013), Rupture dynamics and ground motion from 3-D rough- fault simulations, Journal of Geophysical research, 118, 1–20, doi:10.1002/jgrb.50094.
  49. Shi, Z., S.M. Day, and G. Ely (2012) Dynamic rupture along the San Gorgonio Pass section of the San Andreas Fault (2012), Seism. Res. Lett. 83:2, 423.
  50. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2013a). Ground-Motion Simulation and Validation of the 2008 Chino Hills, California, Earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Ame. 103(1):131–156.
  51. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2013b). Comparative validation of a set of physics-based simulations of the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake using different velocity models. In Proc. CIG/QUEST/IRIS Joint Workshop on Seismic Imaging of Structure and Source, Poster. Fairbanks, Alaska, July 14–17.
  52. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2013). Comparative Validation of a Set of High-Frequency Physics-Based Simulations Using Two Different Velocity Models. In Abstr. SSA Annu. Meet. Salt Lake City, Utah, April 17–19.
  53. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2013d). Ground-Motion Simulation and Validation of the 2008 Chino Hills, California, earthquake using different velocity models. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., Submitted for publication.
  54. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2012). Validation of a 4-Hz physics-based simulation of the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake. In Proc. SSA Annu. Meet. San Diego, California, April 17–19.
  55. Trugman, D. T. and E. M. Dunham (2013), A pseudo-dynamic rupture model generator for earthquakes on geometrically complex faults, submitted to Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America on 24 May 2013.
  56. Unat, D., Zhou, J., Cui, Y., Cai, X. and Baden, S. (2012) Accelerating an Earthquake Simulation with a C-to-CUDA Translator, Journal of Computing in Science and Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 3, 48-58, May/June, CiSESI-2011-09-0094, May, 2012.
  57. Wang, F., Jordan, T.H. (2013) Comparison Of Physics-Based Models And Ground Motion Prediction Equations In Seismic Hazard Analysis For Southern California, Seismological Society of America Meeting, April 17-19 2013, Salt Lake City, SRL (Vol. 84, No. 2)
  58. Wang, F., Jordan, T H. (2012) Using Averaging-Based Factorization to Compare Seismic Hazard Models Derived from 3D Earthquake Simulations with NGA Ground Motion Prediction Equations Abstract S51A-2405 Poster presented at 2012 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 3-7 Dec.
  59. Wang, F., and Jordan, T. H. (2013), Comparison of probabilistic seismic hazard models using averaging-based factorization, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84 pp., submitted 09/27/13.
  60. Wang, F., T. H. Jordan, S. Callaghan, R. Graves, K. Olsen, and P. Maechling, Using averaging-based factorization to assess Cybershake hazard models, submitted to American Geophysical Union Annual Meeting, December, 2013.
  61. Withers, K., K. B. Olsen, S. Shi, S. M. Day, and R. Takedatsu (2013). Deterministic high-frequency ground motions from simulations of dynamic rupture along rough faults, Seismol. Res. Lett., 84:2, 335.
  62. Withers, K, and Kim B. Olsen (2012). Correlation of peak dynamic and static coulomb failure stress with seismicity rate change after the M7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake, Annual AGU Mts, San Francisco, Dec 2012, poster S43E-2517.
  63. Zhou, J., Y. Cui, E. Poyraz, D. Choi, and C. Guest, (2013) Multi-GPU implementation of a 3D finite difference time domain earthquake code on heterogeneous supercomputers," Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science, Vol. 18, 1255-1264, Elesvier, ICC. 2013, Barcelona, June 5-7, 2013.
  64. Zhou, J., Choi, DJ, Cui, Y. (2012) GPU acceleration of a 3D finite difference earthquake code on XSEDE Keeneland, XSEDE’12, Chicago, July 16-20, 2012.
  65. Zhou, J., Didem, U., Choi, D., Guest, C. & Y. Cui (2012) Hands-on Performance Tuning of 3D Finite Difference Earthquake Simulation on GPU Fermi Chipset, Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science, Vol. 9, 976-985, Elesvier, ICCS 2012, Omaha, Nebraska, June, 2012.


Publication Lists from 2012 and earlier

  1. Bielak J., Karaoglu H. and Taborda R. (2011), "Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation", Geophysics, 76(6):T131–T145.
  2. Chourasia, A., E. Mcquinn, J. B. Minster & J. P. Schulze (2011), Visualization Challenge 2010: Non Interactive Media, Science, 331 854-856, doi:10.1126/science.331.6019.854
  3. Cui et al (2012) Development and Optimizations of a SCEC Community Anelastic Wave Propagation Platform for Multicore Systems and GPU-based Accelerators, accepted as presentation, Seismological Society of America (SSA) Meeting, San Diego, May 2012
  4. Day, S.M., D. Roten, and K.B. Olsen (2012). Adjoint analysis of the source and path sensitivities of basin-guided waves, Geophys. J. Int. , Vol 189, pp. 1103-1124, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05416.x
  5. Day, S.M., K.B. Olsen, and Y. Cui (2011). Large-scale earthquake simulations and the prediction of strong ground motion (invited talk), SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences, March 21-24, 2011, Long Beach.
  6. Graves, R. W., and B. T. Aagaard (2011). Testing Long-Period Ground-Motion Simulations of Scenario Earthquakes Using the Mw 7.2 El Mayor–Cucapah Mainshock: Evaluation of Finite-Fault Rupture Characterization and 3D Seismic Velocity Models, BSSA, 101, 895-907, doi: 10.1785/0120100233.
  7. Karaoglu, H., Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2011). Strain-energy compatible partition of Hooke's law --- Application to the modeling of intrinsic attenuation in wave propagation. In Abstracts presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting, SSA, Memphis, TN, April 12--16.
  8. Kozdon, J. E., E. M. Dunham, and J. Nordstrom (2012), Simulation of dynamic earthquake ruptures in complex geometries using high-order finite difference methods, submitted to Journal of Scientific Computing on 15 September 2011, revised 5 June 2012
  9. Liu, Q., Ma, S., and Archuleta, R. J.(2011). Dynamic Rupture Modeling of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 82(2), p.
  10. Ma, S. (2012), A self-consistent mechanism for slow dynamic deformation and tsunami generation for earthquakes in the shallow subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L11310, doi:10.1029/2012GL051854.
  11. Maheshwari, K., Allan Espinosa, Daniel S. Katz, Michael Wilde, Zhao Zhang, Ian Foster, Scott Callaghan, Phillip Maechling (2012), Job and Data Clustering for Aggregate Use of Multiple Production Cyberinfrastructures, The Fifth International Workshop on Data Intensive Distributed Computing (DIDC 2012) Delft, Netherlands June 2012
  12. Ramirez-Guzman, L., Graves, R. W., Olsen, K. B., Boyd, O. S., Hartzell, S., U.S. Ni, S., Somerville, P. G., Williams, R. A., And Zhong, J. (2011). Central United States Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation Working Group: The 1811–1812 New Madrid Earthquake Sequence, SRL, 82(2), p. 275, 10.1785/gssrl.82.2.273.
  13. Restrepo D., Taborda R. and Bielak J. (2011), "Effects of soil nonlinearity on ground response in 3D simulations — An application to the Salt Lake City basin", Proceedings of the 4th IASPEI/IAEE International Symposium: Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, University of California, Santa Barbara, August 23–26.
  14. Rynge, M., Juve, G., Vahi, K., Callaghan, S., Mehta, G., Maechling, P.J., Deelman, E.,, (2012) Enabling Large-scale Scientific Workflows on Petascale Resources Using MPI Master/Worker, XSEDE Conference 2012, accepted for publication, 2012.
  15. Shi, Day, Ely (2012) Dynamic rupture along the San Gorgonio Pass section of the San Andreas Fault (2012), accepted as poster, Seismological Society of America (SSA) Meeting, San Diego, May 2012
  16. Somerville, P. G., Callaghan, S., Maechling, P., Graves, R. W., Collins, N., Olsen, K. B., Imperatori, W., Jones, M., Archuleta, R., Schmedes, J., And Jordan, T.H. (2011). The SCEC Broadband Ground Motion Simulation Platform, SRL, 82(2), p. 275, 10.1785/gssrl.82.2.273.
  17. Taborda R. and Bielak J. (2012), Short-period ground-motion simulation and validation of the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, submitted May 2012
  18. Taborda R. and Bielak J. (2011), "Large-scale earthquake simulation — Computational seismology and complex engineering systems", Computing in Science and Engineering 13(4):14–26.
  19. Taborda R. and Bielak J. (2011), "Full 3D integration of site-city effects in regional scale earthquake simulations", Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Structural Dynamics EURODYN 2011, Mini-symposium MS03: Dynamic soil-structure interaction and wave propagation, Leuven, Belgium, July 4–6.
  20. Taborda, R., Trocha, P. and Bielak, J. (2011). Influence of the built environment on ground motion using 3D large-scale earthquake simulation. In Abstracts presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting, SSA, Memphis, TN, April 12--16.
  21. Unat, D., Zhou, J., Cui, Y., Cai, X. and Baden, S. (2012): Accelerating an Earthquake Simulation with a C-to-CUDA Translator, Journal of Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 14, No. 3, 48-58, May/June, CiSESI-2011-09-0094, May, 2012.
  22. Zhou, J., Didem, U., Choi, D., Guest, C. & Y. Cui (2012), Hands-on Pefrformance Tuning of 3D Finite Difference Earthquake Simulation on GPU Fermi Chipset, Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science, Vol. 9, 976-985, Elesvier, ICCS 2012, Omaha, Nebraska, June, 2012.
  23. Zhou, J., Dong Ju Choi, Yifeng Cui, (2012) GPU Acceleration of a 3D Finite Difference Earthquake Code on XSEDE Keeneland, XSEDE Conference, accepted as presentation, Chicago IL, July 2012
  24. Böse, M., R. Allen, H. Brown, G. Cua, E. Hauksson, T. Heaton, M. Hellweg, M. Liukis, D. Neuhauser, P. Maechling & CISN EEW Group, 2012: CISN ShakeAlert – An Earthquake Early Warning Demonstration System for California, in “Earthquake Early Warning Systems”, Springer, Eds. F. Wenzel and J. Zschau, subm.
  25. Ma, Shuo (2012) A self-consistent mechanism for slow dynamic deformation and tsunami generation for earthquakes in the shallow subduction zone,Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, L11310, doi:10.1029/2012GL051854
  26. Zechar, J.D., Schorlemmer, D., Liukis, M., Yu, J., Euchner, F., Maechling, P.J., Jordan, T.H (2010) The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability perspective on computational earthquake science. Concurrency Computation Practice and Experience volume 22, issue 12, year 2010, pp. 1836 - 1847
  27. Lee, E., Chen, P., Jordan, T.H. & Wang, L, 2011. Rapid Full-Wave Centroid Moment Tensor (CMT) Inversion in a Three- Dimensional Earth Structure Model for Earthquakes in Southern California, Geophysical Journal International, 186(1), 311-330
  28. Schmedes, J., R. J.Archuleta, and D. Lavallée (2010). Correlation of earthquake source parameters inferred from dynamic rupture simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 115,B03304, doi:10.1029/2009JB006689.
  29. Schmedes, J., R. J. Archuleta, and D. Lavallée (2010). Dependency of supershear transition and ground motion on the autocorrelation of initial stress, Tectonophysics, 293, 222-235, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.013.
  30. Liu, Q., Archuleta, R.J., and Smith, R. B. (2010). Ground Motion from Dynamic Ruptures on the Wasatch Fault Embedded in a 3-D Velocity Structure, Seismol. Res. Lett., 81(2), p.320. (2010 SSA Annual Meeting).
  31. Liu, Q., Archuleta,R. J. and Smith, R.B.(2010). Nucleation by Dynamic Triggering on a Multi-Segment Fault, Abstract S33E-03 presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif.
  32. Liu, Q., Ma, S., and Archuleta, R. J.(2011). Dynamic Rupture Modeling of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 82(2), p.
  33. Day, S.M., K.B. Olsen, and Y. Cui (2011). Large-scale earthquake simulations and the prediction of strong ground motion (invited talk), SIAM Conference on Mathematical and Computational Issues in the Geosciences, March 21-24, 2011, Long Beach.
  34. Shi, Z., and S. Day (2010), Dynamic ground motion from earthquake ruptures in models of non-planar faults, Abstract S21C-2071, presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 13-17 Dec.
  35. Graves, R. W., and B. T. Aagaard (2011). Testing Long-Period Ground-Motion Simulations of Scenario Earthquakes Using the Mw 7.2 El Mayor–Cucapah Mainshock: Evaluation of Finite-Fault Rupture Characterization and 3D Seismic Velocity Models, BSSA, 101, 895-907, doi: 10.1785/0120100233.
  36. RAMIREZ-GUZMAN, L., GRAVES, R. W., OLSEN, K. B., BOYD, O. S., HARTZELL, S., NI, S., SOMERVILLE, P. G., WILLIAMS, R. A., and ZHONG, J. (2011). Central United States Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation Working Group: The 1811–1812 New Madrid Earthquake Sequence, SRL, 82(2), p. 275, 10.1785/gssrl.82.2.273.
  37. SOMERVILLE, P. G., CALLAGHAN, S., MAECHLING, P., GRAVES, R. W., COLLINS, N., OLSEN, K. B., IMPERATORI, W., JONES, M., ARCHULETA, R., SCHMEDES, J., and JORDAN, T.H. (2011). The SCEC Broadband Ground Motion Simulation Platform, SRL, 82(2), p. 275, 10.1785/gssrl.82.2.273.
  38. ELY, G.P., JORDAN, T.H., MAECHLING, P., OLSEN, K.B., DAY, S.M., MINSTER, J.-B., GRAVES, R.W., BIELAK, J., Taborda , R., Beroza , G., Ma, S., Cui , Y., Urbanic , J., and Callaghan , S. (2010). The Big Ten Earthquake Scenarios for Southern California, SRL, 81(2), p. 311.
  39. GRAVES, R., CALLAGHAN, S., SMALL, P., MEHTA, G., MILNER, K., JUVE, G., VAHI, K.,FIELD, E., Deelman , E., Okaya , D., Maechling , P., and Jordan , T. (2010). The CyberShake Project: Full-Waveform Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Calculations for Southern California, SRL, 81(2), p. 329.
  40. Milner, K., Jordan, T. H., Graves, R. W., Callaghan, S., Maechling, P. J., Field, E. H., Small, P., and the CyberShake Working Group (2010), A CyberShake-Based System for Operational Forecasting of Earthquake Ground Motions, Abstract S51A-1926 presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif., 13-17 Dec.
  41. Bielak, J., Karaoglu, H., and Taborda, R. (2011). Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation. Geophysics. Submitted for publication.
  42. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2011). Large-scale earthquake simulation — Computational seismology and complex engineering systems. Computing in Science and Engineering, 13(4). Accepted for publication.
  43. Bielak, J., Graves, R. W., Olsen, K. B., Taborda, R., Ram´ırez-Guzm´an, L., Day, S. M., Ely, G. P., Roten, D., Jordan, T. H., Maechling, P. J., Urbanic, J., Cui, Y., and Juve, G. (2010). The ShakeOut earthquake scenario: Verification of three simulation sets. Geophysical Journal International, 180(1):375–404.
  44. Taborda, R., Lopez, J., Karaoglu, H., Urbanic, J., and Bielak, J. (2010). Speeding up finite element wave propagation for large-scale earthquake simulations. Technical Report CMU-PDL-10-109, Carnegie Mellon University, Parallel Data Lab.
  45. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2011). Full 3D integration of site-city effects in regional scale earthquake simulations. In Proceedings of the 2011 EURODYN Conference. Accepted for publication.
  46. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2010). Three dimensional nonlinear soil and site-city effects in earthquake simulations. In Abstracts presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, December 13–17. Abstract S51A-1923.
  47. Bielak, J., Karaoglu, H., and Taborda, R. (2010). Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation. In Abstracts presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, December 13–17. Abstract S43B-2078.
  48. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2010). Full 3D nonlinear soil effects in large-scale ground motion simulations. In Proceedings and Abstracts of the 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA, September 11-15.
  49. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2010). Site-city effects in large-scale 3D earthquake simulations. In Proceedings and Abstracts of the 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA, September 11-15.
  50. Taborda, R., Trocha, P. and Bielak, J. (2011). Influence of the built environment on ground motion using 3D large-scale earthquake simulation. In Abstracts presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting, SSA, Memphis, TN, April 12--16.
  51. Karaoglu, H., Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2011). Strain-energy compatible partition of Hooke's law --- Application to the modeling of intrinsic attenuation in wave propagation. In Abstracts presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting, SSA, Memphis, TN, April 12--16.
  52. Bao, H., Bielak, J., Ghattas, O., Kallivokas, L.F., O’Hallaron, D.R., Shewchuk, J.R. & Xu, J., 1998. Large-scale simulation of elastic wave propagation in heterogeneous media on parallel computers, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 152(1-2), 85–102.
  53. Bielak, J., Xu, J. & Ghattas, O., 1999. Earthquake ground motion and structural response in alluvial valleys, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE, 125(5), 413–423.
  54. Bielak, J., Ghattas, O. & Kim, E.J., 2005. Parallel octree-based finite element method for large-scale earthquake ground motion simulation, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 10(2), 99–112.
  55. Bielak, J., Karaoglu, H. & Taborda, R., 2011. Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation, Geophysics, (accepted for publication).
  56. Bielak, J., Graves, R. W., Olsen, K. B., Taborda, R., Ramírez-Guzmán, L., Day, S. M., Ely, G. P., Roten, D., Jordan, T. H., Maechling, P. J., Urbanic, J., Cui, Y. and Juve, G. (2010). The ShakeOut earthquake scenario: Verification of three simulation sets. Geophysical Journal International, 180(1): 375–404.
  57. Lysmer, J. & Kuhlemeyer, R.L., 1969. Finite dynamic model for infinite media, J. Eng. Mech. Div., ASCE, 95(EM4), 859–877.
  58. Tu, T., Yu, H., Ramírez-Guzmán, L., Bielak, J., Ghattas, O., Ma, K.-L., & O’Hallaron, D.R., 2006. From mesh generation to scientific visualization: an end-to-end approach to parallel supercomputing, in Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, p. 15, IEEE Computer Society, Tampa, Florida. Available [online]: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SC.2006.32.
  59. Taborda, R., López, J., Karaoglu, H., Urbanic, J. and Bielak, J. (2010). Speeding up finite element wave propagation for large-scale earthquake simulations. Technical Report CMU-PDL-10-109, Parallel Data Lab, Carnegie Mellon University. Available [online]: http://www.pdl.cmu.edu/PDL-FTP/AstroDISC/CMU-PDL-10-109.pdf.
  60. Bielak, J., H. Karaoglu, and R. Taborda, Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation, Geophysics (accepted for publication).
  61. Taborda, R. and J. Bielak, Large-scale earthquake simulations: Computational seismology and complex engineering system, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 14-26, 2011.
  62. Taborda, R., J. Lopez, H. Karaoglu, J. Urbanic, and J. Bielak, Speeding-up finite element wave propagation for large-scale earthquake simulations, Technical Report CMU-PDL-10-109, Parallel Data Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, 2010.
  63. Bielak, J., R.W. Graves, K.B. Olsen, R. Taborda, L. Ramirez-Guzman, S.M. Day, G.P. Ely, D. Roten, T.H. Jordan, P.J. Maechling, J. Urbanic, Y. Cui, and G. Juve, The ShakeOut earthquake scenario: Verification of three simulation sets, Geophysical Journal International, 180, 375-404, 2009.
  64. R. Taborda, H. Karaoglu, J. Bielak, J. Urbanic, and L. Ramirez-Guzman, Chino Hills ⎯A highly computationally efficient 2 Hz validation exercise, EOS Trans. AGU, 90(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract S43A-1977 Poster, 2009.
  65. Zechar, J. D., D. Schorlemmer, M. Liukis, J. Yu, F. Euchner, P. J. Maechling, and T. H. Jordan (2010). The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability perspective on computational earthquake science, Concurr. Comput.-Pract. Exp., 22, 1836-1847, doi:10.1002/cpe.1519.
  66. Bielak, J., R.W. Graves, K.B. Olsen, R. Taborda, L. Ramírez-Guzmán, S.M. Day, G.P. Ely, D. Roten, T.H. Jordan, P.J. Maechling, J. Urbanic, Y. Cui, G. Juve, “The ShakeOut earthquake scenario: Verification of three simulation sets,” Geophysical Journal International, 180(1):375–404, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04417x, 2009.
  67. Bielak, J., Karaoglu, H., and Taborda, R. (2010). Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation. In Abstracts presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, December 13–17. Abstract S43B-2078.
  68. Bielak, J., Karaoglu, H., and Taborda, R. (2011). Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation. Geophysics. Submitted for publication.
  69. Callaghan, S., Deelman, E., Gunter, D., Gideon Juve, Philip Maechling, Christopher Brooks, Karan Vahi, Kevin Milner, Robert Graves, Edward Field, David Okaya, Thomas Jordan (2010), Scaling up workflow-based applications, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 76:6, pp. 428-446,September 2010.
  70. Callaghan, S., Maechling, P., Small, P., Milner, K., Juve, G., Jordan, T. H., Deelman, E., Mehta, G., Vahi, K., Gunter, D., Beattie, K., Brooks, C. "Metrics for Heterogeneous Scientific Workflows: A Case Study of an Earthquake Science Application". International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, in press.
  71. Chen, P., Jordan T. H., and Lee, E.J. (2010) Perturbation Kernels for Generalized Seismological Data Functionals (GSDF), Geophysical Journal International, 183, 869-883, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04758.x.
  72. Chen, P., Jordan T. H., and Zhou, L. (2010) Resolving fault plane ambiguity for small earthquakes, Geophysical Journal International, 181, 493-501, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04515.x.
  73. Chourasia, A. 2010. GlyphSea. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Computer Animation Fesitval (Los Angeles, California, July 26 - 30, 2010). SIGGRAPH '10. ACM, New York, NY, 111-111.
  74. Cruz-Atienza, V.M., and K.B. Olsen, K.B. (2010). Supershear Mach-waves expose the fault breakdown slip, Tectonophysics , pp 1-12, doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.012.
  75. Cui, Y., Looking forward to Architecture Changes with Seismic Wave Propagation Using a 3D Finite Difference Code, Int'l Conference of Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, Rhodes, Greece, 19-25 September 2010.
  76. Cui, Y., Olsen, K. B., Jordan, T. H., Lee, K., Zhou, J., Small, P., Roten, D., Ely, G., Panda, D. K., Chourasia, A., Levesque, J., Day, S. M., and Maechling, P. (2010) Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM/IEEE International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, doi=10.1109/SC.2010.45 (SC10 Gordon Bell Finalist).
  77. Ely, G.P., Jordan, T.H., Maechling, P., Olsen, K.B., Day, S.M., Minster, J.-B., Graves, R.W., Bielak, J., Taborda , R., Beroza , G., Ma, S., Cui , Y., Urbanic , J., and Callaghan , S. (2010). The Big Ten Earthquake Scenarios for Southern California, SRL, 81(2), p. 311.
  78. Ely, G. P., S. M. Day, and J.-B. Minster (2010), Dynamic rupture models for the southern San Andreas fault, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. , Vol. 100, pp. 131-150, doi: 10.1785/0120090187.
  79. Graves, R. W., and B. T. Aagaard (2011). Testing Long-Period Ground-Motion Simulations of Scenario Earthquakes Using the Mw 7.2 El Mayor–Cucapah Mainshock: Evaluation of Finite-Fault Rupture Characterization and 3D Seismic Velocity Models, BSSA, 101, 895-907, doi: 10.1785/0120100233.
  80. Graves, R., Callaghan, S., Small, P., Mehta, G., Milner, K., Juve, G., Vahi, K.,Field, E., Deelman , E., Okaya , D., Maechling , P., and Jordan , T. (2010). The CyberShake Project: Full-Waveform Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Calculations for Southern California, SRL, 81(2), p. 329.
  81. Graves, R.W., Pitarka, A. (2010) Broadband ground-motion simulation using a hybrid approach Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (October 2010), 100(5A):2095-2123, doi:10.1785/0120100057.
  82. Graves, R. W., B. T. Aagaard, and K. W. Hudnut (2010). The ShakeOut Earthquake source and ground motion simulations, Earthquake Spectra, in press.
  83. Graves, R., T. Jordan; S. Callaghan; E. Deelman; E. Field; G. Juve; C. Kesselman; P. Maechling; G. Mehta; K. Milner; D. Okaya; P. Small; and K. Vahi (2010). CyberShake: A Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Model for Southern California, Pure Applied Geophys., May 2010.
  84. Juve, G., Ewa Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, g., Berriman, B., Berman, B. P., Maechling, P. (2010), Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2, 22nd IEEE/ACM Conference on Supercomputing (SC10), New Orleans, Louisiana, November 2010.
  85. Juve, G., Ewa Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, g., Berriman, B., Berman, B. P., Maechling, P. (2010): Scientific Workflow Applications on Amazon EC2 CoRR abs/1005.2718: (2010).
  86. Juve, G., Ewa Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, g., Berriman, B., Berman, B. P., Maechling, P. (2010) Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2 CoRR abs/1010.4822: (2010).
  87. Juve, G., Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, G. (2010) Experiences with Resource Provisioning for Scientific Workflows Using Corral, Scientific Programming, 18:2, pp. 77-92, April 2010.
  88. Juve, G., Ewa Deelman (2010), "Scientific Workflows and Clouds", ACM Crossroads, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 14-18, Spring 2010.
  89. Juve, G. and Ewa Deelman (2010), "Scientific Workflows in the Cloud", in Grids, Clouds and Virtualization, M. Cafaro and G. Aloisio, Eds. Springer, pp. 71-91, 2010.
  90. Karaoglu, H., Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2011). Strain-energy compatible partition of Hooke's law --- Application to the modeling of intrinsic attenuation in wave propagation. In Abstracts presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting, SSA, Memphis, TN, April 12--16.
  91. Liu, Q., Archuleta,R. J. and Smith, R.B.(2010). Nucleation by Dynamic Triggering on a Multi-Segment Fault, Abstract S33E-03 presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif.
  92. Liu, Q., Ma, S., and Archuleta, R. J.(2011). Dynamic Rupture Modeling of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 82(2), p.
  93. Mai, P.M., W. Imperatori, and K.B. Olsen (2010). Hybrid broadband ground-motion simulations: combining long-period deterministic synthetics with high-frequency multiple S-to-S back-scattering, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 100, 5A, 2124-2142.
  94. Mena, B., P.M. Mai, K.B. Olsen, M.D. Purvance, and J.N. Brune (2010). Hybrid broadband ground motion simulation using scattering Green's functions: application to large magnitude events, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 100, 5A, 2143-2162.
  95. Moczo, P., J Kristek, P Franek, E Chalub, PY Bard, S Tsune, F Hollender, T Iwata, A Iwaki, E Priolo, P Klin, S Aoi, C Mariotti, J Bielak, R Taborda, H Karaoglu, V Etienne, J Virieux (2010), Numerical Modeling of Earthquake Ground Motion in the Mygdonian Basin, Greece: Verification of the 3D Numerical Methods, Proc. of the Annual Meeting of the Seis. Soc. of America.
  96. Olsen, K.B., and J.E. Mayhew (2010). Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, With Application to the 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills, CA, Earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 81 , 715-723.
  97. Potluri, S., P. Lai, K. Tomko, S. Sur, Y. Cui, M. Tatineni, K. Schulz, W. Barth, A. Majumdar, and D. K. Panda (2010), "Quantifying performance benefits of overlap using MPI-2 in a seismic modeling application", Proceedings of the 24th ACM Int'l Conference on Supercomputing, 2010, pp. 17-25, doi: 10.1145/1810085.1810092.
  98. Ramirez-Guzman, L., Graves, R. W., Olsen, K. B., Boyd, O. S., Hartzell, S., U.S. Ni, S., Somerville, P. G., Williams, R. A., And Zhong, J. (2011). Central United States Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation Working Group: The 1811–1812 New Madrid Earthquake Sequence, SRL, 82(2), p. 275, 10.1785/gssrl.82.2.273.
  99. Schmedes, J., R. J.Archuleta, and D. Lavallée (2010). Correlation of earthquake source parameters inferred from dynamic rupture simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 115,B03304, doi:10.1029/2009JB006689.
  100. Schmedes, J., R. J. Archuleta, and D. Lavallée (2010). Dependency of supershear transition and ground motion on the autocorrelation of initial stress, Tectonophysics, 293, 222-235, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.013.
  101. Somerville, P. G., Callaghan, S., Maechling, P., Graves, R. W., Collins, N., Olsen, K. B., Imperatori, W., Jones, M., Archuleta, R., Schmedes, J., And Jordan, T.H. (2011). The SCEC Broadband Ground Motion Simulation Platform, SRL, 82(2), p. 275, 10.1785/gssrl.82.2.273..
  102. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2011). Large-scale earthquake simulation — Computational seismology and complex engineering systems. Computing in Science and Engineering, 13(4). Accepted for publication.
  103. Taborda, R., Lopez, J., Karaoglu, H., Urbanic, J., and Bielak, J. (2010). Speeding up finite element wave propagation for large-scale earthquake simulations. Technical Report CMU-PDL-10-109, Carnegie Mellon University, Parallel Data Lab.
  104. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2011). Full 3D integration of site-city effects in regional scale earthquake simulations. In Proceedings of the 2011 EURODYN Conference. Accepted for publication.
  105. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2010). Three dimensional nonlinear soil and site-city effects in earthquake simulations. In Abstracts presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, December 13–17. Abstract S51A-1923.
  106. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2010). Full 3D nonlinear soil effects in large-scale ground motion simulations. In Proceedings and Abstracts of the 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA, September 11-15.
  107. Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2010). Site-city effects in large-scale 3D earthquake simulations. In Proceedings and Abstracts of the 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA, September 11-15.
  108. Taborda, R., Trocha, P. and Bielak, J. (2011). Influence of the built environment on ground motion using 3D large-scale earthquake simulation. In Abstracts presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting, SSA, Memphis, TN, April 12--16.
  109. Zhou, J., Y. Cui, S. Davis, C. C. Guest, P. Maechling (2010). "Workflow-based high performance data transfer and ingestion to petascale simulations on TeraGrid", IEEE Computational Sciences and Optimization (CSO10), vol. 1, pp. 343-347.
  110. Bielak, J., R.W. Graves, K.B. Olsen, R. Taborda, L. Ramírez-Guzmán, S.M. Day, G.P. Ely, D. Roten, T.H. Jordan, P.J. Maechling, J. Urbanic, Y. Cui, G. Juve, “The ShakeOut earthquake scenario: Verification of three simulation sets,” Geophysical Journal International, 180(1):375–404, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04417x, 2009.
  111. Bielak, J., Karaoglu, H., and Taborda, R. (2010). Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation. In Abstracts presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, December 13–17. Abstract S43B-2078.
  112. Bielak, J., Karaoglu, H., and Taborda, R. (2011). Memory-efficient displacement-based internal friction for wave propagation simulation. Geophysics. Submitted for publication.
  113. Callaghan, S., Deelman, E., Gunter, D., Gideon Juve, Philip Maechling, Christopher Brooks, Karan Vahi, Kevin Milner, Robert Graves, Edward Field, David Okaya, Thomas Jordan (2010), Scaling up workflow-based applications, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 76:6, pp. 428-446,September 2010
  114. Callaghan, S., Maechling, P., Small, P., Milner, K., Juve, G., Jordan, T. H., Deelman, E., Mehta, G., Vahi, K., Gunter, D., Beattie, K., Brooks, C. "Metrics for Heterogeneous Scientific Workflows: A Case Study of an Earthquake Science Application". International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, in press.
  115. Chen, P., Jordan T. H., and Lee, E.J. (2010) Perturbation Kernels for Generalized Seismological Data Functionals (GSDF), Geophysical Journal International, 183, 869-883, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04758.x
  116. Chen, P., Jordan T. H., and Zhou, L. (2010) Resolving fault plane ambiguity for small earthquakes, Geophysical Journal International, 181, 493-501, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04515.x
  117. Chourasia, A. 2010. GlyphSea. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Computer Animation Fesitval (Los Angeles, California, July 26 - 30, 2010). SIGGRAPH '10. ACM, New York, NY, 111-111
  118. Cruz-Atienza, V.M., and K.B. Olsen, K.B. (2010). Supershear Mach-waves expose the fault breakdown slip, Tectonophysics , pp 1-12, doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.012
  119. Cui, Y., Looking forward to Architecture Changes with Seismic Wave Propagation Using a 3D Finite Difference Code, Int'l Conference of Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, Rhodes, Greece, 19-25 September 2010.
  120. Cui, Y., Olsen, K. B., Jordan, T. H., Lee, K., Zhou, J., Small, P., Roten, D., Ely, G., Panda, D. K., Chourasia, A., Levesque, J., Day, S. M., and Maechling, P. (2010) Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM/IEEE International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, doi=10.1109/SC.2010.45 (SC10 Gordon Bell Finalist)

[12] Ely, G.P., Jordan, T.H., Maechling, P., Olsen, K.B., Day, S.M., Minster, J.-B., Graves, R.W., Bielak, J., Taborda , R., Beroza , G., Ma, S., Cui , Y., Urbanic , J., and Callaghan , S. (2010). The Big Ten Earthquake Scenarios for Southern California, SRL, 81(2), p. 311.

[13] Ely, G. P., S. M. Day, and J.-B. Minster (2010), Dynamic rupture models for the southern San Andreas fault, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. , Vol. 100, pp. 131-150, doi: 10.1785/0120090187

[14] Graves, R. W., and B. T. Aagaard (2011). Testing Long-Period Ground-Motion Simulations of Scenario Earthquakes Using the Mw 7.2 El Mayor–Cucapah Mainshock: Evaluation of Finite-Fault Rupture Characterization and 3D Seismic Velocity Models, BSSA, 101, 895-907, doi: 10.1785/0120100233.

[15] Graves, R., Callaghan, S., Small, P., Mehta, G., Milner, K., Juve, G., Vahi, K.,Field, E., Deelman , E., Okaya , D., Maechling , P., and Jordan , T. (2010). The CyberShake Project: Full-Waveform Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Calculations for Southern California, SRL, 81(2), p. 329.

[16] Graves, R.W., Pitarka, A. (2010) Broadband ground-motion simulation using a hybrid approach Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (October 2010), 100(5A):2095-2123, doi:10.1785/0120100057

[17] Graves, R. W., B. T. Aagaard, and K. W. Hudnut (2010). The ShakeOut Earthquake source and ground motion simulations, Earthquake Spectra, in press.

[18] Graves, R., T. Jordan; S. Callaghan; E. Deelman; E. Field; G. Juve; C. Kesselman; P. Maechling; G. Mehta; K. Milner; D. Okaya; P. Small; and K. Vahi (2010). CyberShake: A Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Model for Southern California, Pure Applied Geophys., May 2010

[19] Juve, G., Ewa Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, g., Berriman, B., Berman, B. P., Maechling, P. (2010), Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2, 22nd IEEE/ACM Conference on Supercomputing (SC10), New Orleans, Louisiana, November 2010

[20] Juve, G., Ewa Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, g., Berriman, B., Berman, B. P., Maechling, P. (2010): Scientific Workflow Applications on Amazon EC2 CoRR abs/1005.2718: (2010)

[21] Juve, G., Ewa Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, g., Berriman, B., Berman, B. P., Maechling, P. (2010) Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2 CoRR abs/1010.4822: (2010)

[22] Juve, G., Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, G. (2010) Experiences with Resource Provisioning for Scientific Workflows Using Corral, Scientific Programming, 18:2, pp. 77-92, April 2010

[23] Juve, G., Ewa Deelman (2010), "Scientific Workflows and Clouds", ACM Crossroads, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 14-18, Spring 2010.

[24] Juve, G. and Ewa Deelman (2010), "Scientific Workflows in the Cloud", in Grids, Clouds and Virtualization, M. Cafaro and G. Aloisio, Eds. Springer, pp. 71-91, 2010.

[25] Karaoglu, H., Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2011). Strain-energy compatible partition of Hooke's law --- Application to the modeling of intrinsic attenuation in wave propagation. In Abstracts presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting, SSA, Memphis, TN, April 12--16.

[26] Liu, Q., Archuleta,R. J. and Smith, R.B.(2010). Nucleation by Dynamic Triggering on a Multi-Segment Fault, Abstract S33E-03 presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, Calif.

[27] Liu, Q., Ma, S., and Archuleta, R. J.(2011). Dynamic Rupture Modeling of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 82(2), p.

[28] Mai, P.M., W. Imperatori, and K.B. Olsen (2010). Hybrid broadband ground-motion simulations: combining long-period deterministic synthetics with high-frequency multiple S-to-S back-scattering, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 100, 5A, 2124-2142

[29] Mena, B., P.M. Mai, K.B. Olsen, M.D. Purvance, and J.N. Brune (2010). Hybrid broadband ground motion simulation using scattering Green's functions: application to large magnitude events, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 100, 5A, 2143-2162

[30] Moczo, P., J Kristek, P Franek, E Chalub, PY Bard, S Tsune, F Hollender, T Iwata, A Iwaki, E Priolo, P Klin, S Aoi, C Mariotti, J Bielak, R Taborda, H Karaoglu, V Etienne, J Virieux (2010), Numerical Modeling of Earthquake Ground Motion in the Mygdonian Basin, Greece: Verification of the 3D Numerical Methods, Proc. of the Annual Meeting of the Seis. Soc. of America.

[31] Olsen, K.B., and J.E. Mayhew (2010). Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, With Application to the 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills, CA, Earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 81 , 715-723

[32] Potluri, S., P. Lai, K. Tomko, S. Sur, Y. Cui, M. Tatineni, K. Schulz, W. Barth, A. Majumdar, and D. K. Panda (2010), "Quantifying performance benefits of overlap using MPI-2 in a seismic modeling application", Proceedings of the 24th ACM Int'l Conference on Supercomputing, 2010, pp. 17-25, doi: 10.1145/1810085.1810092

[33] Ramirez-Guzman, L., Graves, R. W., Olsen, K. B., Boyd, O. S., Hartzell, S., U.S. Ni, S., Somerville, P. G., Williams, R. A., And Zhong, J. (2011). Central United States Earthquake Ground Motion Simulation Working Group: The 1811–1812 New Madrid Earthquake Sequence, SRL, 82(2), p. 275, 10.1785/gssrl.82.2.273.

[34] Schmedes, J., R. J.Archuleta, and D. Lavallée (2010). Correlation of earthquake source parameters inferred from dynamic rupture simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 115,B03304, doi:10.1029/2009JB006689.

[35] Schmedes, J., R. J. Archuleta, and D. Lavallée (2010). Dependency of supershear transition and ground motion on the autocorrelation of initial stress, Tectonophysics, 293, 222-235, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.013

[36] Somerville, P. G., Callaghan, S., Maechling, P., Graves, R. W., Collins, N., Olsen, K. B., Imperatori, W., Jones, M., Archuleta, R., Schmedes, J., And Jordan, T.H. (2011). The SCEC Broadband Ground Motion Simulation Platform, SRL, 82(2), p. 275, 10.1785/gssrl.82.2.273.

[37] Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2011). Large-scale earthquake simulation — Computational seismology and complex engineering systems. Computing in Science and Engineering, 13(4). Accepted for publication.

[38] Taborda, R., Lopez, J., Karaoglu, H., Urbanic, J., and Bielak, J. (2010). Speeding up finite element wave propagation for large-scale earthquake simulations. Technical Report CMU-PDL-10-109, Carnegie Mellon University, Parallel Data Lab.

[39] Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2011). Full 3D integration of site-city effects in regional scale earthquake simulations. In Proceedings of the 2011 EURODYN Conference. Accepted for publication.

[40] Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2010). Three dimensional nonlinear soil and site-city effects in earthquake simulations. In Abstracts presented at 2010 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, December 13–17. Abstract S51A-1923.

[41] Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2010). Full 3D nonlinear soil effects in large-scale ground motion simulations. In Proceedings and Abstracts of the 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA, September 11-15.

[42] Taborda, R. and Bielak, J. (2010). Site-city effects in large-scale 3D earthquake simulations. In Proceedings and Abstracts of the 2010 SCEC Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA, September 11-15.

[43] Taborda, R., Trocha, P. and Bielak, J. (2011). Influence of the built environment on ground motion using 3D large-scale earthquake simulation. In Abstracts presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting, SSA, Memphis, TN, April 12--16.

[44] Zhou, J., Y. Cui, S. Davis, C. C. Guest, P. Maechling, "Workflow-based high performance data transfer and ingestion to petascale simulations on TeraGrid", IEEE Computational Sciences and Optimization (CSO10), vol. 1, pp. 343-347, 2010.

SCEC/CME Publications 2002 through 2008

  1. Akcelik, V., J. Bielak, G. Biros, I. Epanomeritakis, A. Fernandez, O. Ghattas, E. J. Kim, J. Lopez, D. O'Hallaron, T. Tu & J. Urbanic, (2003) High resolution forward and inverse earthquake modeling on terascale computers, Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Supercomputing SC'2003 conference, published on CD-ROM and at www.sc-conference.org/sc2003, 2003
  2. Callaghan, S., P. Maechling, E. Deelman, K. Vahi, G. Mehta, G. Juve, K. Milner, R. Graves, E. Field, D. Okaya, D. Gunter, K. Beattie, and T. Jordan (2008), 'Reducing Time-to-Solution Using Distributed High-Throughput Mega-Workflows -- Experiences from SCEC CyberShake', Fourth IEEE Internation-al Conference on eScience, IEEE, Indianapolis, IN,
  3. Chen, P., L. Zhao, and T. H. Jordan (2007), Full 3D tomography for crustal structure of the Los Angeles region, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 97, 1094-1120, doi: 10.1785/0120060222.
  4. Chen, P., T. H. Jordan and L. Zhao (2007), Full 3D waveform tomography: A comparison between the scattering-integral and adjoint-wavefield methods, Geophys. J. Int., doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2007.03429.x.
  5. Cui, Y., R. Moore, K. Olsen, A. Chourasia, P. Maechling, B. Minster, S. Day, Y. Hu, J. Zhu, A. Majumdar, T. Jordan (2007), Enabling very-large scale earthquake simulations on parallel machines, advancing science and society through computation, International Conference on Computational Science 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series 4487, Part I, 46-53, Springer.
  6. Cui, Y., R. Moore, K. Olsen, A. Chourasia, P. Maechling, B. Minster, S. Day, Y. Hu, Y., Zhu & T. Jordan (2008), Toward petascale earthquake simulations, Acta Geotechnica, DOI 10.1007/s11440-008-0055-2, Springer.
  7. Dalguer, L. A., and S. M. Day (2006). Comparison of fault representation methods in finite difference simulations of dynamic rupture, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., Vol 96, 1764-1778.
  8. Day, S.M., L. A. Dalguer, N. Lapusta and Y. Liu (2005), Comparison of finite difference and boundary integral solutions to three-dimensional spontaneous rupture, J. Geophys. Res., Vol. 110, B12307, doi:10.1029/2005JB003813;
  9. Deelman, E., and Y. Gil (2006) Managing Large-Scale Scientific Workflows in Distributed Environments: Experiences and Challenges, Proceedings of the Workshop on Scientific Workflows and Business Workflow Standards in e-Science, The Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, December 4-6, 2006.
  10. Field, E.H., T.H. Jordan, and C.A. Cornell (2003). OpenSHA: A Developing Community-Modeling Environment for Seismic Hazard Analysis, Seism. Res. Lett. 74, 406-419.
  11. Field, E.H., H.A Seligson, N. Gupta, V. Gupta, T.H. Jordan, and K.W. Campbell (2005). Loss Estimates for a Puente Hills Blind-Thrust Earthquake in Los Angeles, California, Earthquake Spectra, 21, 329-338.
  12. Field, E.H., N. Gupta, V. Gupta, M. Blanpied, P. Maechling, and T.H. Jordan (2005). Hazard Calculations for the WGCEP-2002 Earthquake Forecast Using Distributed Object Technologies, Seism. Res. Lett., 76, 167-172.
  13. Field, E. H., N. Gupta, V. Gupta, M. Blanpied, P. Maechling and T. H Jordan (2005), Hazard Calculations for the WGCEP-2002 Forecast Using OpenSHA and Distributed Object Technologies, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76 No. 2, pp. 161-167;
  14. Field, E.H., V. Gupta, N. Gupta, P. Maechling and T. H Jordan (2005), Hazard Map Calculations Using GRID Computing, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76(5), pp. 565-573.
  15. Graves, R., S. Callaghan, E. Deelman, E. Field, N. Gupta, T. H. Jordan, G. Juve,, C. Kesselman, P. Maechling, G. Mehta, D. Meyers, D. Okaya & K. Vahi (2008), Physics-based probabilistic seismic hazard calculations for Southern California, Proc. 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 8 pp., October, 2008.
  16. Jordan, T.H., and P. Maechling (2003) The SCEC community modeling environment; An information infrastructure for system-level earthquake science, Seismol. Res. Lett., 74, 324-328.
  17. Maechling, P., V. Gupta, N. Gupta, E.H. Field, D. Okaya and T.H. Jordan. (2005) Seismic Hazard Analysis Using Distributed Computing in the SCEC Community Modeling Environment, Seism. Res. Lett., 76, 176-179.
  18. Maechling, P., E. Deelman, G. Mehta, R. Graves, L. Zhao, N. Gupta (2007) SCEC CyberShake Workflows - Automating Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Calculations, Workflows for e-Science, Springer 2007, XXII, 530 p., 181 illus., Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-84628-519-6
  19. Olsen, K. B., S. M. Day, J. B. Minster, Y. Cui, A. Chourasia, M. Faerman, R. Moore, P. Maechling and T. Jordan (2006). Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett, Vol 33, L07305, doi:10.1029/2005GRL025472.
  20. Olsen, K.B., A. Geisselmeyer, W. J. Stephenson, and P.M. Mai (2007), 3D modeling of strong ground motion in the Pacific Northwest from large earthquakes in the Cascadia subduction zone, Seismol. Res. Lett. 78, 273.
  21. Olsen, K.B., S. M. Day, J. B. Minster, Y. Cui, A Chouasia, R. Moore, P. Maechling, T. Jordan (2008), TeraShake2: simulation of Mw7.7 earthquakes on the southern San Andreas fault with spontaneous rupture description, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98, 1162 -1185, doi: 10.1785/0120070148.
  22. Zhao, L., Chen, P., Olsen, K.B., and T. Jordan (2005), Frechet kernels for imaging regional earth structure based on three-dimensional reference models, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 95, 2066-2080.
  23. Zhao, L., P. Chen, and T. H. Jordan (2006), Strain Green’s tensors, reciprocity, and their applications to seismic source and structure studies, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, 1753-1763.

Examples of recent SCEC/CME publications

  1. Bielak, J., R.W. Graves, K.B. Olsen, R. Taborda, L. Ramírez-Guzmán, S.M. Day, G.P. Ely, D. Roten, T.H. Jordan, P.J. Maechling, J. Urbanic, Y. Cui, G. Juve, “The ShakeOut earthquake scenario: Verification of three simulation sets,” Geophysical Journal International doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04417x, 2009.
  2. Callaghan, Scott, Ewa Deelman, Dan Gunter, Gideon Juve, Philip Maechling, Christopher Brooks, Karan Vahi, Kevin Milner, Robert Graves, Edward Field, David Okaya, Thomas Jordan (2010), Scaling up workflow-based applications, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 76:6, pp. 428-446,September 2010
  3. Chen, P., Jordan T. H., and Lee, E.J. (2010) Perturbation Kernels for Generalized Seismological Data Functionals (GSDF), Geophysical Journal International, 183, 869-883, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04758.x
  4. Chen, P., Jordan T. H., and Zhou, L. (2010) Resolving fault plane ambiguity for small earthquakes, Geophysical Journal International, 181, 493-501, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04515.x
  5. Cruz-Atienza, V.M., and K.B. Olsen, K.B. (2010). Supershear Mach-waves expose the fault breakdown slip, Tectonophysics , pp 1-12, doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.012
  6. Cui, Y., Olsen, K. B., Jordan, T. H., Lee, K., Zhou, J., Small, P., Roten, D., Ely, G., Panda, D. K., Chourasia, A., Levesque, J., Day, S. M., and Maechling, P. (2010) Scalable Earthquake Simulation on Petascale Supercomputers. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM/IEEE International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, doi=10.1109/SC.2010.45 (SC10 Gordon Bell Finalist)
  7. Cui, Y., Chourasia, A., Moore, R., Olsen, K., Maechling, P., Jordan, T., The TeraShake Computational Platform, Advances in Geocomputing, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences 119, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-85879-9_7, pp229-278, editor H. Xing, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
  8. Cruz-Atienza, V.M., K.B. Olsen, and L.A. Dalguer (2009). Estimation of the breakdown slip from strong-motion seismograms: insights from numerical experiments Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 9, 3454-3469, doi:10.1785/0120080330
  9. Dalguer, L.A., and S.M. Day (2009). Asymmetric rupture of large aspect-ratio faults at bimaterial interface in 3D, Geophys. Res. Lett. , Vol. 36, L23307, doi:10.1029/2009GL040303
  10. Doser, D.I., K.B. Olsen, F.F. Pollitz, R.S. Stein, and S. Toda (2009). The 1911 M~6.6 Calaveras earthquake: Source parameters and the role of static, viscoelastic and dynamic Coulomb stress changes imparted by the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 99, 1746-1759.
  11. Ely, G. P., S. M. Day, and J.-B. Minster (2010), Dynamic rupture models for the southern San Andreas fault, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. , Vol. 100, pp. 131-150, doi: 10.1785/0120090187
  12. Ely, G. P., S. M. Day, and J.-B. Minster (2009), A support-operator method for 3D rupture dynamics, Geophys. J. Int., 177(3), 1140-1150, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04117.x.
  13. Graves, R.W., Pitarka, A. (2010) Broadband ground-motion simulation using a hybrid approach Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (October 2010), 100(5A):2095-2123, doi:10.1785/0120100057
  14. Graves, R. W., B. T. Aagaard, and K. W. Hudnut (2010). The ShakeOut Earthquake source and ground motion simulations, Earthquake Spectra, in press.
  15. Graves, R., T. Jordan; S. Callaghan; E. Deelman; E. Field; G. Juve; C. Kesselman; P. Maechling; G. Mehta; K. Milner; D. Okaya; P. Small; and K. Vahi (2010). CyberShake: A Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Model for Southern California, Pure Applied Geophys., May 2010
  16. Harris, R. A., Barall, M., Archuleta, R., Dunham, E., Aagaard, B., Ampuero, J. P., Bhat, H., Cruz-Atienza, V., Dalguer, L., Dawson, P., Day, S., Duan, B., Ely, G., Kaneko, Y., Kase, Y., Lapusta, N., Liu, Y., Ma, S., Oglesby, D., Olsen, K., Pitarka, A., Song, S., Templeton, E. (2009) The SCEC/USGS Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Code Verification Exercise, Seismological Research Letters Vol. 80, p. 119-126
  17. Juve, G., Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, G. (2010) Experiences with Resource Provisioning for Scientific Workflows Using Corral, Scientific Programming, 18:2, pp. 77-92, April 2010
  18. Juve, G., Ewa Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, g., Berriman, B., Berman, B. P., Maechling, P. (2010), Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2, 22nd IEEE/ACM Conference on Supercomputing (SC10), New Orleans, Louisiana, November 2010
  19. Juve, G., Ewa Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, g., Berriman, B., Berman, B. P., Maechling, P. (2010): Scientific Workflow Applications on Amazon EC2 CoRR abs/1005.2718: (2010)
  20. Juve, G., Ewa Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, g., Berriman, B., Berman, B. P., Maechling, P. (2010) Data Sharing Options for Scientific Workflows on Amazon EC2 CoRR abs/1010.4822: (2010)
  21. Lee, K., Cui, Y., Maechling, P., Olsen, K. and Jordan, T., Communication Optimizations of SCEC AWP-Olsen Application for Petascale Computing (accept, Supercomputing 09, Portland, 2009; Lee, K., Cui, Y., Kaiser, T., Maechling, P., Olsen, K. and Jordan, T., IO Optimizations of SCEC AWP-Olsen Application for Petascale Earthquake Computing (both FINALISTS of Best Posters), SC09, Portland, 2009.
  22. Maechling, P., E. Deelman, Y. Cui (2009), Implementing Software Acceptance Tests as Scientific Workflows, Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications, July 13-17, 2009, 2 Volumes. CSREA Press 2009, ISBN 1-60132-123-6, pp. 317-323
  23. Mai, P.M., W. Imperatori, and K.B. Olsen (2010). Hybrid broadband ground-motion simulations: combining long-period deterministic synthetics with high-frequency multiple S-to-S back-scattering, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 100, 5A, 2124-2142
  24. Mena, B., P.M. Mai, K.B. Olsen, M.D. Purvance, and J.N. Brune (2010). Hybrid broadband ground motion simulation using scattering Green's functions: application to large magnitude events, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 100, 5A, 2143-2162
  25. Moczo, P., J Kristek, P Franek, E Chalub, PY Bard, S Tsune, F Hollender, T Iwata, A Iwaki, E Priolo, P Klin, S Aoi, C Mariotti, J Bielak, R Taborda, H Karaoglu, V Etienne, J Virieux (2010), Numerical Modeling of Earthquake Ground Motion in the Mygdonian Basin, Greece: Verification of the 3D Numerical Methods, Proc. of the Annual Meeting of the Seis. Soc. of America.
  26. Olsen, K.B., and J.E. Mayhew (2010). Goodness-of-fit Criteria for Broadband Synthetic Seismograms, With Application to the 2008 Mw5.4 Chino Hills, CA, Earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 81 , 715-723
  27. Olsen, K.B., and G. Ely (2009). WebSims: A Web-based System for Storage, Visualization, and Dissemination of Earthquake Ground Motion Simulations, Seismol. Res. Lett. 80, 1002-1007, doi:10.1785/gssrl.80.6.1002
  28. Olsen, K. B., Dalguer, L., Day, S., Cui, Y., Zhu, J., Cruz, V.M., Roten, D., Mayhew, J., Maechling, P., Jordan, T., Chourasia, A. and Okaya, D. ShakeOut-D: Ground Motion Estimates Using an Ensemble of Large Earthquakes on the Southern San Andreas Fault With Spontaneous Rupture Propagation, Geophysical Research Letters, doi:10.1029/2008GL036832, in press, 2009.
  29. Pitarka, A., L.A. Dalguer, S.M. Day, P. Somerville, and K. Dan (2009). Numerical study of ground motion differences between buried and surface-rupturing earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. , Vol. 99, 1521-1537, doi: 10.1785/0120080193
  30. Rojas, O., E. Dunham, S.M. Day, L.A. Dalguer, and J.E. Castillo (2009). Finite difference modeling of rupture propagation with strong velocity-weakening friction, Geophys. J. Int. , Vol. 179, 1831-1858, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04387.x
  31. Taborda, R., J. López, H. Karaoglu, J. Urbanic and J. Bielak (2010), Speeding Up Wave Propagation for Large-Scale Earthquake Simulations, Proceedings of the SC10 International Conference for HPC, Networking and Analysis. (Submitted for publication).

Technical Conference Rankings