Difference between revisions of "Software Licenses"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with '*prepare for license review from users *identify position on license issues *collaborate with groups that have good practices')
 
 
(31 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
*prepare for license review from users
+
== Overview of SCEC Open-Source Software Licenses ==
*identify position on license issues
+
SCEC scientific software is open-source in order to provide transparency into the scientific calculations performed by the code. Based on NSF funding requirements that we use an OSI approved open-source license, and the recommendations from USC Stevens Institute, we are standardizing our software licenses on BSD-3.
*collaborate with groups that have good practices
+
 
 +
== BSD-3 License Text for SCEC Software ==
 +
USC Stevens reviewed and approved this version of the BSD-3 license for use with SCEC open-source software.
 +
*[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/CME/BSD_3_LICENSE_USC.txt USC BSD-3 License Text File]
 +
 
 +
== Software License Information ==
 +
*[https://opensource.org/ Open Source Initiative Website]
 +
*[https://stevens.usc.edu/ USC Stevens Research Website]
 +
 
 +
== USC Stevens Software License Recommendations ==
 +
*[https://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/CME/USC-Stevens-Guidance-on-Software-Distribution-050318.pdf USC Stevens Research Guidance on Software Licenses]
 +
 
 +
== Preferred Copyright Notice for Documentation ==
 +
For end-users of SCEC software, documentation and training materials should included copyright notices. As a research organization, we recommend that SCEC software documentation is distributed under a Creative Commons copyright, described below.
 +
*[https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ CC by 4.0]
 +
This copyright notice permits copying and redistributing the material, remixing, and building upon it as long as the users give appropriate credit to the original authors. More details about this copyright are given on the CC pages.
 +
 
 +
*[https://creativecommons.org/ Creative Commoms Website]
 +
 
 +
== Data Copyrights ==
 +
 
 +
Data versus database
 +
 
 +
In any data project, there are likely to be two components. The first is the data collected, assembled, or generated. Think of it as the raw content in the system. It could be hourly temperature readings from a sensor, the age of individuals in a survey, recordings of individual voices, or photographs of plant specimens. The second component is the data system in which the data is stored and managed.
 +
 
 +
We usually do not think of data content separate from the system in which it is stored, but the distinction is important in terms of intellectual property rights. The question is what, if anything, is protected by copyright. Data that is factual has no copyright protection under U.S. law; it is not possible to copyright facts. Not all data is in the public domain. A project might, for example, use copyrighted photographs; the photographs are part of the project’s “data.” In many cases, the data in a data management system as well as the metadata describing that data will be factual, and hence not protected by copyright.
 +
 
 +
A database, on the other hand, can have a thin layer of copyright protection. Deciding what data needs to be included in a database, how to organize the data, and how to relate different data elements are all creative decisions that may receive copyright protection.
 +
 
 +
Because of the different copyright status of databases and data content, different mechanisms are required to manage each. Copyright can govern the use of databases and some data content (that which is itself original), but contract law, trademarks, and other mechanisms are required to regulate factual data.
 +
 
 +
== Related Entries ==
 +
*[https://opensha.org/ OpenSHA]
 +
*[https://github.com/SCECcode/bbp/wiki Broadband Platform]
 +
*[[CyberShake]]
 +
*[https://github.com/SCECcode/UCVMC/wiki UCVM]
 +
*[https://github.com/SCECcode/csep2 PyCSEP]

Latest revision as of 18:00, 3 September 2021

Overview of SCEC Open-Source Software Licenses

SCEC scientific software is open-source in order to provide transparency into the scientific calculations performed by the code. Based on NSF funding requirements that we use an OSI approved open-source license, and the recommendations from USC Stevens Institute, we are standardizing our software licenses on BSD-3.

BSD-3 License Text for SCEC Software

USC Stevens reviewed and approved this version of the BSD-3 license for use with SCEC open-source software.

Software License Information

USC Stevens Software License Recommendations

Preferred Copyright Notice for Documentation

For end-users of SCEC software, documentation and training materials should included copyright notices. As a research organization, we recommend that SCEC software documentation is distributed under a Creative Commons copyright, described below.

This copyright notice permits copying and redistributing the material, remixing, and building upon it as long as the users give appropriate credit to the original authors. More details about this copyright are given on the CC pages.

Data Copyrights

Data versus database

In any data project, there are likely to be two components. The first is the data collected, assembled, or generated. Think of it as the raw content in the system. It could be hourly temperature readings from a sensor, the age of individuals in a survey, recordings of individual voices, or photographs of plant specimens. The second component is the data system in which the data is stored and managed.

We usually do not think of data content separate from the system in which it is stored, but the distinction is important in terms of intellectual property rights. The question is what, if anything, is protected by copyright. Data that is factual has no copyright protection under U.S. law; it is not possible to copyright facts. Not all data is in the public domain. A project might, for example, use copyrighted photographs; the photographs are part of the project’s “data.” In many cases, the data in a data management system as well as the metadata describing that data will be factual, and hence not protected by copyright.

A database, on the other hand, can have a thin layer of copyright protection. Deciding what data needs to be included in a database, how to organize the data, and how to relate different data elements are all creative decisions that may receive copyright protection.

Because of the different copyright status of databases and data content, different mechanisms are required to manage each. Copyright can govern the use of databases and some data content (that which is itself original), but contract law, trademarks, and other mechanisms are required to regulate factual data.

Related Entries