California CVM Meeting - 3 April 2012: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:UCERF-ruptures.png|256px|thumb|right|Fig 2:Map of faults in Unified California Earthquake Rupture 2.0 (2007). (Image Credit: Kevin Milner (USC))]] | [[File:UCERF-ruptures.png|256px|thumb|right|Fig 2:Map of faults in Unified California Earthquake Rupture 2.0 (2007). (Image Credit: Kevin Milner (USC))]] | ||
== Draft Agenda == | == California CVM Meeting Goals == | ||
# Define desired features in a California CVM | |||
# Review capabilities and features of existing California CVMs | |||
# Develop methods for integrating inversion-based CVM improvements | |||
# Description of UCVM Capabilities | |||
# Plan UCVM-CyberShake elements and development | |||
# Plan SCEC4 UCVM | |||
== Draft Meeting Agenda == | |||
#California CVM Requirements | #California CVM Requirements | ||
##Distribution UCERF3.0 Ruptures | ##Distribution UCERF3.0 Ruptures | ||
Revision as of 17:59, 23 March 2012


California CVM Meeting Goals
- Define desired features in a California CVM
- Review capabilities and features of existing California CVMs
- Develop methods for integrating inversion-based CVM improvements
- Description of UCVM Capabilities
- Plan UCVM-CyberShake elements and development
- Plan SCEC4 UCVM
Draft Meeting Agenda
- California CVM Requirements
- Distribution UCERF3.0 Ruptures
- Geotechnical
- Elevation
- Bathmetry
- Hydrology
- CVM-S
- CVM-H
- UCVM
- Re-integration of Inversions into CVMS
- Po South Cal Inversion
- Carl Cal Inversion
- Candidate CyberShake Models
- Merged and smoothed models
- California Inversion-based model
- Candidate 5 Year Development
- CVM-H development plans