Offshore Southern California Velocity Structure: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with "To improve the Southern California Velocity Models in SCEC's UCVM, we are working on adding a model described in this paper: == Reference Publication == *Offshore Southern Ca..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
*Thoughts on how we confirm it has been integrated into ucvm correctly | *Thoughts on how we confirm it has been integrated into ucvm correctly | ||
= Related Entries == | == Related Entries == | ||
*[[UCVM]] | *[[UCVM]] | ||
*[[CVM-H]] | *[[CVM-H]] | ||
*[[CVM-S]] | *[[CVM-S]] | ||
Revision as of 17:57, 31 January 2020
To improve the Southern California Velocity Models in SCEC's UCVM, we are working on adding a model described in this paper:
Reference Publication
- Offshore Southern California lithospheric velocity structure from noise cross-correlation functions
- D. C. Bowden1, M. D. Kohler2, V. C. Tsai1, and D. S. Weeraratne
- JGR RESEARCH ARTICLE - DOI: 10.1002/2016JB012919
SCEC Models
- [CVM Web]
- [GFM Web]
- [CFM Web]
- [UCVM Software]
Standard Velocity Model Questions
- Model for a flat region or topography?
- Default projection for model
- Model dimensions and resolution
- Material properties in model (standard are vp, vs, and density)
- Any special considerations for geotechnical layer (top 350m or so?). Related, what is the minimum Vs in the model.
- Preferred formulas for populating vp and density if the model is vs only
- Where to get the existing data files
- Review the ucvm interpolation method (trilinear interpolation)
- Thoughts on how we confirm it has been integrated into ucvm correctly
