Offshore Southern California Velocity Structure: Difference between revisions
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Reference Publication == | == Reference Publication == | ||
*Offshore Southern California lithospheric velocity structure from noise cross-correlation functions | *Offshore Southern California lithospheric velocity structure from noise cross-correlation functions (2016) D. C. Bowden1, M. D. Kohler2, V. C. Tsai1, and D. S. Weeraratne, JGR RESEARCH ARTICLE, DOI: 10.1002/2016JB012919 | ||
*[https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB012919 AGU Publication of Model Description] | *[https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB012919 AGU Publication of Model Description] | ||
*[https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB012919 Publication Link] | *[https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB012919 Publication Link] | ||
Revision as of 15:15, 27 March 2020
To improve the Southern California Velocity Models in SCEC's UCVM, we are working on adding a model described in this paper:
Reference Publication
- Offshore Southern California lithospheric velocity structure from noise cross-correlation functions (2016) D. C. Bowden1, M. D. Kohler2, V. C. Tsai1, and D. S. Weeraratne, JGR RESEARCH ARTICLE, DOI: 10.1002/2016JB012919
- AGU Publication of Model Description
- Publication Link
- Publication Link
SCEC Models
- CVM Web Community Velocity Model Viewer
- GFM Web Geological Framework Model Viewer
- CFM Web Community Fault Model Viewer
- UCVM Software Wiki UCVM Github Wiki
Standard Velocity Model Questions
- Model for a flat region or topography?
- Default projection for model
- Model dimensions and resolution
- Material properties in model (standard are vp, vs, and density)
- Any special considerations for geotechnical layer (top 350m or so?). Related, what is the minimum Vs in the model.
- Preferred formulas for populating vp and density if the model is vs only
- Where to get the existing data files
- Review the ucvm interpolation method (trilinear interpolation)
- Thoughts on how we confirm it has been integrated into ucvm correctly