Difference between revisions of "CSEP Minutes 10-03-2018"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "CSEP Working Group Home Page<br><br>") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[CSEP_Working_Group|CSEP Working Group Home Page]]<br><br> | [[CSEP_Working_Group|CSEP Working Group Home Page]]<br><br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Participants:'' N. Field, A. Michael, J. Gilchrist, M. Werner, W. Savran, and D. Rhoades | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Friday meeting with Ned F. @ USC. Will walk through UCERF3 simulations before running production copies. | ||
| + | * simulations will be used for developing evaluations for stochastic event sets and gathering information | ||
| + | * Talking about forecast horizon for official forecasts | ||
| + | ** New Zealand: 1d, 1w, 3mo, 1yr, etc. based on time since aftershock | ||
| + | ** CEA: interested in short-term and 1yr | ||
| + | * idea: start u3etas in 1985(?) and march forward updating at pre-defined intervals (regular or in-response to earthquake) | ||
| + | * question: how do we perform quantitative comparisons between models? | ||
| + | ** likelihood | ||
| + | ** psuedo-likelihood (moving back to grid) | ||
| + | * immediate: turing tests & u3etas-simulations | ||
| + | * outstanding problems: | ||
| + | ** 1. reproducibility issues within ComCat, should be solved by the USGS | ||
| + | ** 2. comparative testing of models | ||
Latest revision as of 23:39, 19 October 2018
Participants: N. Field, A. Michael, J. Gilchrist, M. Werner, W. Savran, and D. Rhoades
- Friday meeting with Ned F. @ USC. Will walk through UCERF3 simulations before running production copies.
- simulations will be used for developing evaluations for stochastic event sets and gathering information
- Talking about forecast horizon for official forecasts
- New Zealand: 1d, 1w, 3mo, 1yr, etc. based on time since aftershock
- CEA: interested in short-term and 1yr
- idea: start u3etas in 1985(?) and march forward updating at pre-defined intervals (regular or in-response to earthquake)
- question: how do we perform quantitative comparisons between models?
- likelihood
- psuedo-likelihood (moving back to grid)
- immediate: turing tests & u3etas-simulations
- outstanding problems:
- 1. reproducibility issues within ComCat, should be solved by the USGS
- 2. comparative testing of models
