Difference between revisions of "Study 2.2 Data Products"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search(26 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=== Basic hazard maps === | === Basic hazard maps === | ||
− | [[File:Study_2.2_basic.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 Hazard Map (300 ppi, ps file)]] [[File:Study_2.2_basic_sites.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 Hazard Map, sites marked (300 ppi, ps file)]] | + | {| |
− | + | | [[File:Study_2.2_basic.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 Hazard Map ([http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_map/interpolated.300.png 300 ppi], [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_map/interpolated.ps ps file])]] | |
+ | | [[File:Study_2.2_basic_sites.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 Hazard Map, sites marked ([http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_map/interpolated_marks.300.png 300 ppi], [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_map/interpolated_marks.ps ps file])]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
=== Comparison with attenuation relationships === | === Comparison with attenuation relationships === | ||
{| | {| | ||
− | | | + | | [[File:Study_2.2_ar_diff_sites.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 vs AR Difference Map, sites marked. Reds and pinks are higher CyberShake hazard, greens and blues lower. ([http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_map/diff.300.png 300 ppi], [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_map/diff.ps ps file])]] |
− | | [[File:Study_2.2_ar_ratio_sites.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 vs AR Ratio Map, sites marked (300 ppi, ps file)]] | + | | [[File:Study_2.2_ar_ratio_sites.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 vs AR Ratio Map, sites marked. Reds and pinks are higher CyberShake hazard, greens and blues lower. ([http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_map/ratio.300.png 300 ppi], [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_map/ratio.ps ps file])]] |
|} | |} | ||
=== Comparison with CyberShake 1.0 === | === Comparison with CyberShake 1.0 === | ||
− | [[File:Study_2.2_cs1.0_diff.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 vs CS1.0 Difference Map (300 ppi, ps file)]] | + | ==== CyberShake 1.0 Hazard Map ==== |
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | | [[File:CyberShake 2009.PNG|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake 1.0 results using C&B as background model.]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Difference ==== | ||
+ | {| | ||
+ | | [[File:Study_2.2_cs1.0_diff.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 vs CS1.0 Difference Map. Reds and pinks are higher Study 2.2 hazard, greens and blues lower. ([http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_diff_1.0/interpolated.300.png 300 ppi], [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_diff_1.0/interpolated.ps ps file])]] | ||
+ | | [[File:Study_2.2_cs1.0_diff_sites.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 vs CS1.0 Difference Map, sites marked. Reds and pinks are higher Study 2.2 hazard, greens and blues lower. ([http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_diff_1.0/interpolated_marks.300.png 300 ppi], [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_diff_1.0/interpolated_marks.ps ps file])]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Ratio ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| | ||
+ | | [[File:Study_2.2_cs1.0_ratio.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 vs CS1.0 Ratio Map. Reds and pinks are higher Study 2.2 hazard, greens and blues lower. ([http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_ratio_1.0/interpolated.300.png 300 ppi], [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_ratio_1.0/interpolated.ps ps file])]] | ||
+ | | [[File:Study_2.2_cs1.0_ratio_sites.150.png|356px|thumb|left|CyberShake Study 2.2 vs CS1.0 Ratio Map, sites marked. Reds and pinks are higher Study 2.2 hazard, greens and blues lower. ([http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_ratio_1.0/interpolated_marks.300.png 300 ppi], [http://opensha.usc.edu/ftp/kmilner/cybershake/study_2.2/3_sec_SA_2_percent_in_50/cs_1.1_ratio_1.0/interpolated_marks.ps ps file])]] | ||
+ | |} | ||
− | + | == Hazard Curves == | |
− | [ | + | Hazard curves for the sites involved can be retrieved from [http://northridge.usc.edu/cybershake/status/cgi-bin/runmanager.py]. Select "Completed", click "Refresh", then click on "Stats" in the right-hand column for the site of interest, to see 10, 5, and 3 sec hazard curves. |
− | [[ | + | == Related Entries == |
+ | *[[CyberShake]] | ||
+ | *[[CME]] | ||
+ | *[[SEISM Project]] | ||
+ | *[[Geoinformatics Project]] |
Latest revision as of 23:43, 2 April 2013
Contents
Hazard Maps
Below are hazard maps at 150 ppi resolution. Higher resolutions are available via links in the captions.
Basic hazard maps
Comparison with attenuation relationships
Comparison with CyberShake 1.0
CyberShake 1.0 Hazard Map
Difference
Ratio
Hazard Curves
Hazard curves for the sites involved can be retrieved from [1]. Select "Completed", click "Refresh", then click on "Stats" in the right-hand column for the site of interest, to see 10, 5, and 3 sec hazard curves.