Difference between revisions of "Offshore Southern California Velocity Structure"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== Reference Publication ==
 
== Reference Publication ==
*Offshore Southern California lithospheric velocity structure from noise cross-correlation functions
+
*Offshore Southern California lithospheric velocity structure from noise cross-correlation functions (2016) D. C. Bowden1, M. D. Kohler2, V. C. Tsai1, and D. S. Weeraratne, JGR RESEARCH ARTICLE, DOI: 10.1002/2016JB012919
*D. C. Bowden1, M. D. Kohler2, V. C. Tsai1, and D. S. Weeraratne
 
*JGR RESEARCH ARTICLE - DOI: 10.1002/2016JB012919
 
 
*[https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB012919 AGU Publication of Model Description]
 
*[https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB012919 AGU Publication of Model Description]
 
*[https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB012919 Publication Link]
 
*[https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2016JB012919 Publication Link]

Revision as of 15:15, 27 March 2020

To improve the Southern California Velocity Models in SCEC's UCVM, we are working on adding a model described in this paper:

Reference Publication

SCEC Models

Standard Velocity Model Questions

  • Model for a flat region or topography?
  • Default projection for model
  • Model dimensions and resolution
  • Material properties in model (standard are vp, vs, and density)
  • Any special considerations for geotechnical layer (top 350m or so?). Related, what is the minimum Vs in the model.
  • Preferred formulas for populating vp and density if the model is vs only
  • Where to get the existing data files
  • Review the ucvm interpolation method (trilinear interpolation)
  • Thoughts on how we confirm it has been integrated into ucvm correctly

Related Entries