Difference between revisions of "CyberShake Meeting - 4 April 2012"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''Introduction and Meeting Goals ''' | '''Introduction and Meeting Goals ''' | ||
*09:00 Welcome, Goals, and Objectives (T. Jordan) | *09:00 Welcome, Goals, and Objectives (T. Jordan) | ||
| + | *09:05 CyberShake Overview (P. Maechling) | ||
*09:15 Recent CyberShake Production Runs (S. Callaghan) | *09:15 Recent CyberShake Production Runs (S. Callaghan) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ''' | + | '''CyberShake Hazard Model Analysis''' |
| − | *10: | + | *09:30 Analysis of CyberShake Results (F. Wang) |
| − | *10: | + | *09:45 CyberShake Validation using PBR (G. Biassi/J. Donovan) |
| − | * | + | *10:00 Higher Frequency (1.0Hz and 10.0Hz) CyberShake Hazard Curves |
| − | *11: | + | *10:15 Break |
| − | *11: | + | |
| − | * | + | '''UCERF3.0 PSHA Calculation Elements''' |
| + | *10:30 UCERF3.0 versus UCERF2.0 (N. Field) | ||
| + | *10:45 CyberShake California CVM (P. Chen) | ||
| + | *11:00 UCERF3.0 Extended ERF (R. Graves) | ||
| + | *11:15 CyberShake Processing Software (P. Maechling) | ||
| + | *11:30 Discussion | ||
| + | *12:00 Lunch | ||
| + | |||
| + | *10:00 Sensitivity Studies for CVM and Ruptures at 0.5Hz (T. Jordan) | ||
| + | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*12:30 Lunch | *12:30 Lunch | ||
| − | ''' HPC Developments''' | + | ''' HPC Software Developments''' |
| − | *13: | + | *13:00 AWP-ODC-SGT and AWP-ODC-GPU (Y. Cui) |
| − | *13: | + | *13:15 Hercules (R. Taborda) |
| − | * | + | *13:30 AWP-Graves (R. Graves) |
| − | * | + | *13:45 Workflows on Track 1 (G. Mehta) |
| − | *14: | + | *14:00 Blue Waters Status (J. Alameda) |
| − | *14: | + | *14:15 Discussion |
| + | *14:30 Break | ||
| − | '''CyberShake | + | '''CyberShake Computational Plans''' |
| − | * | + | *14:45 Data products and publication planning (P. Maechling) |
| − | *15: | + | *15:00 CyberShake computational phases (T. Jordan) |
| − | *15: | + | *15:15 Initial Northern California Hazard Curve evaluation process (B. Aagaard) |
| − | *15: | + | *15:30 Discussion and Next Steps (T. Jordan/G. Beroza) |
*16:00 Adjourn | *16:00 Adjourn | ||
Revision as of 22:09, 28 March 2012
CyberShake Meeting Goals
- Develop scientific and technical basis for integrating SCEC scientific products including UCERF3.0, CVM, and software into a SCEC CyberShake calculation.
- Develop computational methods and techniques that will enable us to scale-up a CyberShake 1.0Hz PSHA calculation to 5000 sites using UCERF3.0
Agenda & Presentations
Introduction and Meeting Goals
- 09:00 Welcome, Goals, and Objectives (T. Jordan)
- 09:05 CyberShake Overview (P. Maechling)
- 09:15 Recent CyberShake Production Runs (S. Callaghan)
CyberShake Hazard Model Analysis
- 09:30 Analysis of CyberShake Results (F. Wang)
- 09:45 CyberShake Validation using PBR (G. Biassi/J. Donovan)
- 10:00 Higher Frequency (1.0Hz and 10.0Hz) CyberShake Hazard Curves
- 10:15 Break
UCERF3.0 PSHA Calculation Elements
- 10:30 UCERF3.0 versus UCERF2.0 (N. Field)
- 10:45 CyberShake California CVM (P. Chen)
- 11:00 UCERF3.0 Extended ERF (R. Graves)
- 11:15 CyberShake Processing Software (P. Maechling)
- 11:30 Discussion
- 12:00 Lunch
- 10:00 Sensitivity Studies for CVM and Ruptures at 0.5Hz (T. Jordan)
- 12:30 Lunch
HPC Software Developments
- 13:00 AWP-ODC-SGT and AWP-ODC-GPU (Y. Cui)
- 13:15 Hercules (R. Taborda)
- 13:30 AWP-Graves (R. Graves)
- 13:45 Workflows on Track 1 (G. Mehta)
- 14:00 Blue Waters Status (J. Alameda)
- 14:15 Discussion
- 14:30 Break
CyberShake Computational Plans
- 14:45 Data products and publication planning (P. Maechling)
- 15:00 CyberShake computational phases (T. Jordan)
- 15:15 Initial Northern California Hazard Curve evaluation process (B. Aagaard)
- 15:30 Discussion and Next Steps (T. Jordan/G. Beroza)
- 16:00 Adjourn
