Difference between revisions of "Offshore Southern California Velocity Structure"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "To improve the Southern California Velocity Models in SCEC's UCVM, we are working on adding a model described in this paper: == Reference Publication == *Offshore Southern Ca...") |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
*Thoughts on how we confirm it has been integrated into ucvm correctly | *Thoughts on how we confirm it has been integrated into ucvm correctly | ||
| − | = Related Entries == | + | == Related Entries == |
*[[UCVM]] | *[[UCVM]] | ||
*[[CVM-H]] | *[[CVM-H]] | ||
*[[CVM-S]] | *[[CVM-S]] | ||
Revision as of 17:57, 31 January 2020
To improve the Southern California Velocity Models in SCEC's UCVM, we are working on adding a model described in this paper:
Contents
Reference Publication
- Offshore Southern California lithospheric velocity structure from noise cross-correlation functions
- D. C. Bowden1, M. D. Kohler2, V. C. Tsai1, and D. S. Weeraratne
- JGR RESEARCH ARTICLE - DOI: 10.1002/2016JB012919
SCEC Models
- [CVM Web]
- [GFM Web]
- [CFM Web]
- [UCVM Software]
Standard Velocity Model Questions
- Model for a flat region or topography?
- Default projection for model
- Model dimensions and resolution
- Material properties in model (standard are vp, vs, and density)
- Any special considerations for geotechnical layer (top 350m or so?). Related, what is the minimum Vs in the model.
- Preferred formulas for populating vp and density if the model is vs only
- Where to get the existing data files
- Review the ucvm interpolation method (trilinear interpolation)
- Thoughts on how we confirm it has been integrated into ucvm correctly
