Difference between revisions of "Offshore Southern California Velocity Structure"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== SCEC Models == | == SCEC Models == | ||
*[http://moho.scec.org/UCVM_web/web/viewer.php CVM Web] | *[http://moho.scec.org/UCVM_web/web/viewer.php CVM Web] | ||
| − | *[GFM Web] | + | *[http://moho.scec.org/GFM_web/web/viewer.php GFM Web] |
*[https://www.scec.org/research/cfm-viewer/ CFM Web] | *[https://www.scec.org/research/cfm-viewer/ CFM Web] | ||
*[https://github.com/SCECcode/UCVMC/wiki UCVM Software Wiki] | *[https://github.com/SCECcode/UCVMC/wiki UCVM Software Wiki] | ||
Revision as of 22:10, 31 January 2020
To improve the Southern California Velocity Models in SCEC's UCVM, we are working on adding a model described in this paper:
Contents
Reference Publication
- Offshore Southern California lithospheric velocity structure from noise cross-correlation functions
- D. C. Bowden1, M. D. Kohler2, V. C. Tsai1, and D. S. Weeraratne
- JGR RESEARCH ARTICLE - DOI: 10.1002/2016JB012919
SCEC Models
Standard Velocity Model Questions
- Model for a flat region or topography?
- Default projection for model
- Model dimensions and resolution
- Material properties in model (standard are vp, vs, and density)
- Any special considerations for geotechnical layer (top 350m or so?). Related, what is the minimum Vs in the model.
- Preferred formulas for populating vp and density if the model is vs only
- Where to get the existing data files
- Review the ucvm interpolation method (trilinear interpolation)
- Thoughts on how we confirm it has been integrated into ucvm correctly
