Difference between revisions of "California CVM Meeting - 3 April 2012"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[File:UCERF-ruptures.png|256px|thumb|right|Fig 2:Map of faults in Unified California Earthquake Rupture 2.0 (2007). (Image Credit: Kevin Milner (USC))]] | ||
+ | |||
[[File:Chen California Merged Inversions.png|256px|thumb|right|Fig 1:Preliminary results (Sept 2011) showing differences in Vs as a results of scattering integral inversions using both observed seismic events and ambient noise processing. Starting CVM's are USGS Central California and CVM-S southern California models (Image Credit: Po Chen (Univ. of Wyoming))]] | [[File:Chen California Merged Inversions.png|256px|thumb|right|Fig 1:Preliminary results (Sept 2011) showing differences in Vs as a results of scattering integral inversions using both observed seismic events and ambient noise processing. Starting CVM's are USGS Central California and CVM-S southern California models (Image Credit: Po Chen (Univ. of Wyoming))]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
== California CVM Meeting Goals == | == California CVM Meeting Goals == |
Revision as of 18:05, 23 March 2012
California CVM Meeting Goals
- Define desired features in a California CVM
- Review capabilities and features of existing California CVMs
- Develop methods for integrating inversion-based CVM improvements
- Description of UCVM Capabilities
- Plan candidate UCVM-CyberShake Model
- Plan SCEC4 UCVM Model
Draft Meeting Agenda
- California CVM Requirements
- Distribution UCERF3.0 Ruptures
- Geotechnical
- Elevation
- Bathmetry
- Hydrology
- Features of Existing California CVMs
- CVM-S
- CVM-H
- Lin-Thurber
- USGS CenCal
- Buidling Combined Models using UCVM
- Re-integration of Inversions into CVMs
- Po South Cal Inversion
- Carl Cal Inversion
- Candidate CyberShake Models
- Merged and smoothed models
- California Inversion-based model
- Candidate 5 Year Development
- CVM-H development plans