CyberShake Meeting - 4 April 2012

From SCECpedia
Revision as of 22:09, 28 March 2012 by Maechlin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Fig 1:Regional-scale San Andreas rupture under consideration for UCERF3.0. (Image Credit: Kevin Milner (USC))

CyberShake Meeting Goals

  • Develop scientific and technical basis for integrating SCEC scientific products including UCERF3.0, CVM, and software into a SCEC CyberShake calculation.
  • Develop computational methods and techniques that will enable us to scale-up a CyberShake 1.0Hz PSHA calculation to 5000 sites using UCERF3.0

Agenda & Presentations

Introduction and Meeting Goals

  • 09:00 Welcome, Goals, and Objectives (T. Jordan)
  • 09:05 CyberShake Overview (P. Maechling)
  • 09:15 Recent CyberShake Production Runs (S. Callaghan)

CyberShake Hazard Model Analysis

  • 09:30 Analysis of CyberShake Results (F. Wang)
  • 09:45 CyberShake Validation using PBR (G. Biassi/J. Donovan)
  • 10:00 Higher Frequency (1.0Hz and 10.0Hz) CyberShake Hazard Curves
  • 10:15 Break

UCERF3.0 PSHA Calculation Elements

  • 10:30 UCERF3.0 versus UCERF2.0 (N. Field)
  • 10:45 CyberShake California CVM (P. Chen)
  • 11:00 UCERF3.0 Extended ERF (R. Graves)
  • 11:15 CyberShake Processing Software (P. Maechling)
  • 11:30 Discussion
  • 12:00 Lunch
  • 10:00 Sensitivity Studies for CVM and Ruptures at 0.5Hz (T. Jordan)


  • 12:30 Lunch

HPC Software Developments

  • 13:00 AWP-ODC-SGT and AWP-ODC-GPU (Y. Cui)
  • 13:15 Hercules (R. Taborda)
  • 13:30 AWP-Graves (R. Graves)
  • 13:45 Workflows on Track 1 (G. Mehta)
  • 14:00 Blue Waters Status (J. Alameda)
  • 14:15 Discussion
  • 14:30 Break

CyberShake Computational Plans

  • 14:45 Data products and publication planning (P. Maechling)
  • 15:00 CyberShake computational phases (T. Jordan)
  • 15:15 Initial Northern California Hazard Curve evaluation process (B. Aagaard)
  • 15:30 Discussion and Next Steps (T. Jordan/G. Beroza)
  • 16:00 Adjourn

Related Entries