Difference between revisions of "UCVM Users Guide"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
#SCEC CVM-4 [[CVM-S]]  
 
#SCEC CVM-4 [[CVM-S]]  
 
#SCEC CVM-H [[CVM-H]]
 
#SCEC CVM-H [[CVM-H]]
#USGS Bay Area
+
#USGS Bay Area Model
#Carl's Great Valley model
+
#Carl's Great Valley Model
 +
#Rob Grave's Cape Mendocino Region Model
  
  
Line 43: Line 44:
 
Boundary boxes point data files will be posted shortly
 
Boundary boxes point data files will be posted shortly
  
== Cape Mendocino Region Model ==
+
 
 +
== Cliff Thurber's Regional 3D P-wave Velocity Model ==
 +
 
 +
Here is info on the first of four of our regional-scale 3D P-wave velocity models that I will provide.  This is for our Northern California model, published in
 +
 
 +
Thurber, C., H. Zhang, T. Brocher, and V. Langenheim, Regional three-dimensional seismic velocity model of the crust and uppermost mantle of northern California, J.Geophys. Res., 114, B01304, doi:10.1029/2008JB005766, 2009.
 +
 
 +
#Formally, the bounding rectangle is approximately given below however, the western edge realistically is the California coastline, and the northern edge is not quite to the Oregon border.
 +
*42.60, -122.32
 +
*40.34, -126.27
 +
*37.74, -117.88
 +
*35.62, -121.71
 +
#The bottom nodes of the model are at 36 km.
 +
#Node spacing is mostly 10 or 15 km in the NE-SW direction and is uniformly 20 km in the NW-SE direction.  Actual model resolution based on checkerboard tests is nominally ~twice the node spacing.
 +
#Just Vp.
 +
 
 +
== Rob Graves' Cape Mendocino Region Model ==
  
 
This manuscript describes some 3D modeling of the Eel River basin which is in
 
This manuscript describes some 3D modeling of the Eel River basin which is in

Revision as of 21:34, 2 February 2011

Unified California Velocity Model (UCVM) is a proposed California state-wide 3D velocity model. One important use of UCVM is in high resolution 3D wave propagation simulations for California. UCVM development is an interdisciplinary research collaboration involving geoscientists and computer scientists. UCVM geoscience research includes identification and assembly of existing California velocity models into a state-wide model and improvements to existing velocity models. UCVM computer science research includes definition of a easy-to-use CVM query interface, integration of regional 3D and geotechnical models, and automated CVM evaluation processing capabilities.

Existing Model Coverage

UCVM is trying to move forward on a statewide seismic velocity model for CA suitable for ground-motion modeling. Current concept is that this model would not be a single model but a seamless combination of models covering various regions of the state. The tricky part of course is the transition from one model to another and the use of background models to fill in the gaps.

As a first step, we want to put together a map of the coverage:

Current detailed seismic velocity models

  1. SCEC CVM-4 CVM-S
  2. SCEC CVM-H CVM-H
  3. USGS Bay Area Model
  4. Carl's Great Valley Model
  5. Rob Grave's Cape Mendocino Region Model


Background tomographic models

  1. Cliff's regional northern CA model,
  2. Egill's regional southern CA model,
  3. Cliff's statewide model


Description of each model should include the following information:

  1. the bounding polygon for each models,
  2. the depth extent
  3. a brief description of the resolution, and
  4. the physical properties it includes (i.e., density, Vp, Vs, Qp, Qs).

Summary of Regions

Coverage regions of various California 3D velocity Models (Figure by Carl Tape )

Tape is working on a new socal mesh (black) of CVMH6.3 will cover somewhat west and north of the current CVMH model. This is the m16 model region from my thesis, which was based on an older CVMH model. Eventually it will contain the entire CVMH6.3 model, including to the south. All CVMH6.3 simulations are Vp, Vs, rho, with constant attenuation above the basement surface (in the basins). CVMH goes down a couple hundred kms, but the portion I use is upper 60 km, and the local earthquake inversion sensitivity is dominantly upper 25 km.

  • The yellow dashed line is the target simulation goal for San Joaquin and Sierra model and simulations. Andreas, John, and Carl have developed several surfaces within this region (including to the continental shelf), and we have lots of velocity data in the San Joaquin basin, which is our focus. (Andreas loaded the Lin-Thurber CA model as well.)
  • The red box is CVMH6.3
  • The inner red box as the high-res LA model.

Boundary boxes point data files will be posted shortly


Cliff Thurber's Regional 3D P-wave Velocity Model

Here is info on the first of four of our regional-scale 3D P-wave velocity models that I will provide. This is for our Northern California model, published in

Thurber, C., H. Zhang, T. Brocher, and V. Langenheim, Regional three-dimensional seismic velocity model of the crust and uppermost mantle of northern California, J.Geophys. Res., 114, B01304, doi:10.1029/2008JB005766, 2009.

  1. Formally, the bounding rectangle is approximately given below however, the western edge realistically is the California coastline, and the northern edge is not quite to the Oregon border.
  • 42.60, -122.32
  • 40.34, -126.27
  • 37.74, -117.88
  • 35.62, -121.71
  1. The bottom nodes of the model are at 36 km.
  2. Node spacing is mostly 10 or 15 km in the NE-SW direction and is uniformly 20 km in the NW-SE direction. Actual model resolution based on checkerboard tests is nominally ~twice the node spacing.
  3. Just Vp.

Rob Graves' Cape Mendocino Region Model

This manuscript describes some 3D modeling of the Eel River basin which is in the Cape Mendocino region at the northern end of the San Andreas. Rob Graves did this work as part of the development of the 3D FD methodology and published as a USGS external grant report.

  • Cape mendocino-19941027.pdf

Related Entries

See Also