Difference between revisions of "UCVM Verification"

From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Prior to release of UCVM in docker version, we are re-verifying the codebase to show that it can reproduce results from previously published papers.
 
Prior to release of UCVM in docker version, we are re-verifying the codebase to show that it can reproduce results from previously published papers.
 
  
 
== Eymold Jordan JGR ==
 
== Eymold Jordan JGR ==
 
* Eymold, W. K., & Jordan, T. H. ( 2019). Tectonic regionalization of the Southern California crust from tomographic cluster analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124, 11840– 11865. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018423
 
* Eymold, W. K., & Jordan, T. H. ( 2019). Tectonic regionalization of the Southern California crust from tomographic cluster analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124, 11840– 11865. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018423
  
== Comparison Plotting Scripts ==
+
== CVM-S4.26 Model Description ==
*[http://moho.scec.org/BILL/compare.html Compare UCVM CVM-S4.26 Model to Billy CVM-S4.26 Model]
+
CVM-S4.26 is a tomography improved seismic velocity model for southern California. En-Jui Lee and Po Chen started with a large 500kmx900kmx60km volume in southern California. This model is the 26th tomographic iteration from a starting CVM based on SCEC CVM-S4.
 +
 
 +
Several version of the CVM-S4.26 model were distributed by the modelers. There is an ASCII grid version with a separate file for each depth layer. There is a ASCII with all depth slices merged into a single file. There is a binary version used in UCVM. There is another ASCII version available for download from Po Chen's website.
 +
 
 +
In this exercise, the Eymold/Jordan authors used a version of CVM-S4.26 that they received directly from En-Jui Lee and develop their own tools for querying the model and calculating the average Vs profiles shown. The other profiles are extracted from the binary version of CVM-S4.26 used in UCVM v18.4.
  
 
== Images from Paper ==
 
== Images from Paper ==
 +
In this study, we reproduce figure 2 in this publication. This figure shows 15 CVM-S4.26 Vs profiles. Each profile is an average of 51x51 points around the point of interest. The overlay website below compare
 
[[File:Figure_1.png|256px|thumb|left|Fig 1: CVM-S4.26 Model Slices (Image Credit: William Eymold) ]]
 
[[File:Figure_1.png|256px|thumb|left|Fig 1: CVM-S4.26 Model Slices (Image Credit: William Eymold) ]]
 
[[File:Figure_2.png |256px |thumb|center| Fig 2: CVM-S4.26 Average Profiles (Image Credit: William Eymold)]]
 
[[File:Figure_2.png |256px |thumb|center| Fig 2: CVM-S4.26 Average Profiles (Image Credit: William Eymold)]]
 +
 +
== Comparison Plotting Scripts ==
 +
*[http://moho.scec.org/BILL/compare.html Compare UCVM CVM-S4.26 Model to Billy CVM-S4.26 Model]
  
 
== Related Entries ==
 
== Related Entries ==

Revision as of 04:36, 13 March 2020

Prior to release of UCVM in docker version, we are re-verifying the codebase to show that it can reproduce results from previously published papers.

Eymold Jordan JGR

  • Eymold, W. K., & Jordan, T. H. ( 2019). Tectonic regionalization of the Southern California crust from tomographic cluster analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124, 11840– 11865. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018423

CVM-S4.26 Model Description

CVM-S4.26 is a tomography improved seismic velocity model for southern California. En-Jui Lee and Po Chen started with a large 500kmx900kmx60km volume in southern California. This model is the 26th tomographic iteration from a starting CVM based on SCEC CVM-S4.

Several version of the CVM-S4.26 model were distributed by the modelers. There is an ASCII grid version with a separate file for each depth layer. There is a ASCII with all depth slices merged into a single file. There is a binary version used in UCVM. There is another ASCII version available for download from Po Chen's website.

In this exercise, the Eymold/Jordan authors used a version of CVM-S4.26 that they received directly from En-Jui Lee and develop their own tools for querying the model and calculating the average Vs profiles shown. The other profiles are extracted from the binary version of CVM-S4.26 used in UCVM v18.4.

Images from Paper

In this study, we reproduce figure 2 in this publication. This figure shows 15 CVM-S4.26 Vs profiles. Each profile is an average of 51x51 points around the point of interest. The overlay website below compare

Fig 1: CVM-S4.26 Model Slices (Image Credit: William Eymold)
Fig 2: CVM-S4.26 Average Profiles (Image Credit: William Eymold)

Comparison Plotting Scripts

Related Entries