Difference between revisions of "Forecast Data"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
*[https://github.com/kevinmilner/event-reports/tree/master/2020_09_30-ci39641528-M4.93-4km_NE_of_Westmorland_CA Event Response Dataset] | *[https://github.com/kevinmilner/event-reports/tree/master/2020_09_30-ci39641528-M4.93-4km_NE_of_Westmorland_CA Event Response Dataset] | ||
*[https://www.scec.org/earthquakes/eventpage/generate Simulation on Demand] | *[https://www.scec.org/earthquakes/eventpage/generate Simulation on Demand] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Broadband Platform Data: | ||
| + | *[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/bbp/highf/2020-08-18/2020-08-18-edge-bbp/index-202008201.html Broadband Simulation Results] | ||
== Data Sharing Methods == | == Data Sharing Methods == | ||
Revision as of 17:17, 8 December 2020
Links to existing SCEC Forecast Data Distribution Methods:
Contents
Forecast Data Descriptions
Forecast Data Listings
ETAS Simulation Data:
UCERF Project Data:
CSEP Project Data:
Ground Motion Simulation Project Data:
- High-F Results
- UGMS User Community
- Engineer Oriented Data Distribution Site
- GIS-based interface to Hazard Maps
Event Response Data:
Broadband Platform Data:
Data Sharing Methods
- Predictability Workshop Report
- USGS Fundamental Practices
- DOE ECP IDEAS Talks
- DOE Containers for Software Reproduciblity Webinar
Related Projects
- Deriva Project
- WholeTale Project
- Geohazard Projects
- Mid-scale Research Infrastructure - 1
- forecasts.php?clicked=title Trustworthy Forecast Project
- Software Institute
- NSF Geoscience opportunities
- Geohazard Overview
Forecast User Base Estimates
- We have these estimates of the user base for products that come out of CISM and CSEP. And how those numbers are documented. UCERF3-ETAS: 5-10 people currently look at raw simulation results. If we create a full operational system, it would potentially have broad user base, but it's currently in a research mode and only shared with interested and sophisticated users.
- UCERF3+ Inversions: The inversion results will be looked at by the core WGCEP team and shared with the scientific review panel, so probably 5-10 diving in and looking at detailed results, ~30 looking at summary plots. The New Zealand team would likely be interested in these capabilities as well, which could double the user base.RSQSim: Likely always a small group, <10 looking at RSQSim results and downstream products (ground motion simulations)
- With the RISE experiment gearing up and many new modelers looking to get their models tested, and assuming that UCERF3/4 goes under prospective testing I expect between 20-30 people will be interested in looking at individual forecast and evaluation results. An additional ~10 would be interested in looking at aggregate results, such as the cumulative tests (ie., types of results that could be a publication figure), but I don’t have a good handle on those numbers. Like with the UCERF3 results, the potential user base would probably increase depending on the availability of the data products and simulations results.
